"Some Kind of Notice" Is No Kind of Standard: The Need for Judicial Intervention and Clarity in Due Process Protections for Public School Students.
- Published in:
- George Washington Law Review, 2018, v. 86, n. 2, p. 655
- By:
- Publication type:
- Article
Works matching DE "EXCLUSIONARY rule (Evidence)"
Results: 315
1
2
Excluderea unui asociat. Condiţii de admisibilitate, din perspec tiva dispoziţiilor art. 222 alin. (1) lit. c) din Legea nr. 31/1990.
- Published in:
- Romanian Case Law Review / Revista Română de Jurisprudenţă, 2014, n. 2, p. 64
- Publication type:
- Article
3
Lopez-Rodriguez v. Mukasey: The Ninth Circuit's Expansion of the Exclusionary Rule in Immigration Hearings Contradicts the Supreme Court's Lopez-Mendoza Decision.
- Published in:
- Brigham Young University Law Review, 2010, v. 2010, n. 1, p. 51
- By:
- Publication type:
- Article
4
Excluding the Exclusionary Rule: Extending the Rationale of Hudson v. Michigan to Evidence Seized During Unauthorized Nighttime Searches.
- Published in:
- Brigham Young University Law Review, 2007, v. 2007, n. 2, p. 451
- By:
- Publication type:
- Article
5
Fixing the Constable's Blunder: Can One Trial Judge in One County in One State Nudge a Nation Beyond the Exclusionary Rule?
- Published in:
- Brigham Young University Law Review, 2006, v. 2006, n. 1, p. 1
- By:
- Publication type:
- Article
6
The Exclusionary Rule and Damages: An Economic Comparison of Private Remedies for Unconstitutional Police Conduct.
- Published in:
- Brigham Young University Law Review, 2000, v. 2000, n. 4, p. 1443
- By:
- Publication type:
- Article
7
NEW JERSEY V. T.L.O.: SCHOOL SEARCHES AND THE APPLICABILITY OF THE EXCLUSIONARY RULE IN JUVENILE DELINQUENCY AND CRIMINAL PROCEEDINGS.
- Published in:
- Brigham Young University Education & Law Journal, 2011, v. 2011, n. 2, p. 667
- By:
- Publication type:
- Article
8
Removing samples taken illegally in the criminal trial.
- Published in:
- Manager (University of Bucharest, Faculty of Business & Administration), 2009, n. 10, p. 200
- By:
- Publication type:
- Article
9
Immigration and the British news media: Continuity or change?
- Published in:
- Sociology Compass, 2018, v. 12, n. 9, p. 1, doi. 10.1111/soc4.12618
- By:
- Publication type:
- Article
10
REJECTION OF THE FRUIT OF THE POISONOUS TREE DOCTRINE IN AUSTRALIA: A RETREAT FROM PROGRESSMSM.
- Published in:
- University of Notre Dame Australia Law Review, 2011, v. 13, p. 17
- By:
- Publication type:
- Article
11
The co-production of purified space: hybrid policing in German Business Improvement Districts.
- Published in:
- European Urban & Regional Studies, 2012, v. 19, n. 2, p. 121, doi. 10.1177/0969776411420018
- By:
- Publication type:
- Article
12
BLACK AND POOR: THE GRAVE CONSEQUENCES OF UTAH V. STRIEFF.
- Published in:
- St. Thomas Law Review, 2017, v. 30, n. 1, p. 68
- By:
- Publication type:
- Article
13
BIG BILL HAYWOOD'S REVENGE: THE ORIGINAL INTENT OF THE EXCLUSIONARY RULE.
- Published in:
- St. Thomas Law Review, 2009, v. 22, n. 1, p. 35
- By:
- Publication type:
- Article
14
THE EXCLUSIONARY RULE AND THE DUELING LEGACIES OF UTAH V. STRIEFF: WHICH WILL BE SUPPRESSED?
- Published in:
- St. Mary's Law Journal, 2017, v. 48, n. 3, p. 583
- By:
- Publication type:
- Article
15
THR WRONG DECISION AT THE WRONG TIME: UTAH V. STRIEFF IN THE ERA OF AGGRESSIVE POLICING.
- Published in:
- SMU Law Review, 2017, v. 70, n. 2, p. 293
- By:
- Publication type:
- Article
16
THE EXCLUSIONARY RULE AS A SYMBOL OF THE RULE OF LAW.
- Published in:
- SMU Law Review, 2014, v. 67, n. 4, p. 821
- By:
- Publication type:
- Article
17
CRIMINAL PROCEDURE: CONFESSIONS, SEARCHES, AND SEIZURES.
- Published in:
- SMU Law Review, 2012, v. 65, n. 2, p. 423
- By:
- Publication type:
- Article
18
COUNTERPUBLIC ORIGINALISM AND THE EXCLUSIONARY CRITIQUE.
- Published in:
- Alabama Law Review, 2016, v. 67, n. 3, p. 675
- By:
- Publication type:
- Article
19
The Exclusionary Rule in Immigration Proceedings: Where it Was, Where it Is, Where it May be Going.
- Published in:
- San Diego International Law Journal, 2010, v. 12, n. 1, p. 53
- By:
- Publication type:
- Article
20
The legal structure of propensity evidence.
- Published in:
- International Journal of Evidence & Proof, 2016, v. 20, n. 2, p. 136, doi. 10.1177/1365712716628540
- By:
- Publication type:
- Article
21
Overruling the protectionist exclusionary rule.
- Published in:
- International Journal of Evidence & Proof, 2015, v. 19, n. 4, p. 270, doi. 10.1177/1365712715601764
- By:
- Publication type:
- Article
22
‘In the interests of justice’ as the new test to exclude relevant evidence in Singapore: ANB v ANC [2014] SGHC 172; Wan Lai Ting v Kea Kah Kim [2014] SGHC 180.
- Published in:
- International Journal of Evidence & Proof, 2015, v. 19, n. 1, p. 67, doi. 10.1177/1365712714566374
- By:
- Publication type:
- Article
23
Exclusion of evidence: DPP (Walsh) v Cash.
- Published in:
- International Journal of Evidence & Proof, 2011, v. 15, n. 1, p. 62, doi. 10.1350/ijep.2011.15.1.368
- By:
- Publication type:
- Article
24
Negotiation and the law of contract – multivalency or incoherence?
- Published in:
- Common Law World Review, 2023, v. 52, n. 1, p. 3, doi. 10.1177/14737795231166966
- By:
- Publication type:
- Article
25
The slow death of a dogma? The prohibition of legislative history in the 20th century.
- Published in:
- Common Law World Review, 2021, v. 50, n. 2/3, p. 120, doi. 10.1177/1473779520967951
- By:
- Publication type:
- Article
26
Millar v Taylor as a precedent for statutory interpretation.
- Published in:
- Common Law World Review, 2018, v. 47, n. 3, p. 217, doi. 10.1177/1473779518793843
- By:
- Publication type:
- Article
27
Bhatia International to Videocon Industries and Yograj Infrastructure: Recasting the Foundations of Arbitration Law in India.
- Published in:
- Arbitration International, 2013, v. 29, n. 1, p. 105, doi. 10.1093/arbint/29.1.105
- By:
- Publication type:
- Article
28
CHINA'S TORTUOUS PATH TOWARD ENDING TORTURE IN CRIMINAL INVESTIGATIONS.
- Published in:
- Columbia Journal of Asian Law, 2011, v. 24, n. 2, p. 273
- By:
- Publication type:
- Article
29
CHINA'S NEW EXCLUSIONARY RULE: AN INTRODUCTION.
- Published in:
- Columbia Journal of Asian Law, 2011, v. 24, n. 2, p. 229
- By:
- Publication type:
- Article
30
A discussion on the provisions of the exclusionary rule against illegally obtained evidence in China's criminal procedure law.
- Published in:
- Journal of Eastern European Criminal Law, 2015, n. 2, p. 13
- By:
- Publication type:
- Article
31
Social withdrawal in Russian youth: using the Extended Class Play to examine socio-emotional and academic adjustment.
- Published in:
- International Journal of Adolescence & Youth, 2015, v. 20, n. 4, p. 485, doi. 10.1080/02673843.2013.806270
- By:
- Publication type:
- Article
32
Assessing the Effects of Antitrust Enforcement in the United States.
- Published in:
- De Economist (0013-063X), 2008, v. 156, n. 4, p. 433, doi. 10.1007/s10645-008-9103-4
- By:
- Publication type:
- Article
33
The Missing Link: Connecting Key Evidence to the Jurors.
- Published in:
- Defense Counsel Journal, 2008, v. 75, n. 1, p. 26
- By:
- Publication type:
- Article
34
Admissibility of Evidence of Subsequent Remedial Measures in Strict Liability.
- Published in:
- Defense Counsel Journal, 2003, v. 70, n. 2, p. 540
- By:
- Publication type:
- Article
35
Inclusion and Exclusion through Risk-Based Justice: Analysing Combinations of Risk Assessment from Pretrial Detention to Release.
- Published in:
- British Journal of Criminology, 2020, v. 60, n. 4, p. 1080, doi. 10.1093/bjc/azaa012
- By:
- Publication type:
- Article
36
PROTOCOL NO. 24: FACT OR FICTION FOR EU ROMA?
- Published in:
- Marmara: Journal of European Studies / Avrupa Araştırmaları Dergisi, 2013, v. 21, n. 1, p. 1
- By:
- Publication type:
- Article
37
WHY CAN'T WE ALL JUST GET ALONG? THE RELATIONSHIP BETWEEN THE EXCLUSIONARY RULE, THE GOOD FAITH EXCEPTION, AND THE COURT'S RETROACTIVITY PRECEDENTS AFTER ARIZONA V. GANT.
- Published in:
- UMKC Law Review, 2011, v. 80, n. 2, p. 485
- By:
- Publication type:
- Article
38
THE FRAMERS' FOURTH AMENDMENT EXCLUSIONARY RULE: THE MOUNTING EVIDENCE.
- Published in:
- Nevada Law Journal, 2014, v. 15, n. 1, p. 42
- By:
- Publication type:
- Article
39
The Exclusionary Rule and Judicial Integrity: An Empirical Study of Public Perceptions of the Exclusionary Rule.
- Published in:
- Missouri Law Review, 2022, v. 87, n. 4, p. 1
- By:
- Publication type:
- Article
40
An Economics Perspective on the Exclusionary Rule and Deterrence.
- Published in:
- Missouri Law Review, 2010, v. 75, n. 2, p. 459
- By:
- Publication type:
- Article
41
Bridging the Information Gap: The Department of Justice's "Pattern or Practice" Suits and Community Organizations.
- Published in:
- Texas Law Review, 2014, v. 92, n. 5, p. 1241
- By:
- Publication type:
- Article
42
THE EXCLUSIONARY RULE IS DEAD. LONG LIVE THE EXCLUSIONARY RULE.
- Published in:
- Virginia Journal of Social Policy & the Law, 2023, v. 30, n. 2, p. 116
- By:
- Publication type:
- Article
43
BREAKING THE PURPOSIVE BARRIER: EMBRACING NON-REPETITION AS A GUIDING PRINCIPLE FOR SUBSECTION 24(2) OF THE CHARTER.
- Published in:
- University of British Columbia Law Review, 2018, v. 51, n. 2, p. 289
- By:
- Publication type:
- Article
44
Do Sagebrush Rebels Have a Colorable Claim? The Space Between Parochialism and Exclusion in Federal Lands Management.
- Published in:
- Public Land & Resources Law Review, 2017, v. 38, n. 1, p. 57
- By:
- Publication type:
- Article
45
THE HAND-OFF PROCEDURE OR THE NEW SILVER PLATTER: HOW TODAY'S POLICE ARE SERVING UP POTENTIALLY TAINTED EVIDENCE WITHOUT EVEN REVEALING THE SEARCH THAT PRODUCED IT TO DEFENDANTS OR TO COURTS.
- Published in:
- Stanford Law Review, 2010, v. 62, n. 3, p. 863
- By:
- Publication type:
- Article
46
FOURTH AMENDMENT REMEDIAL EQUILIBRATION: A COMMENT ON HERRING V. UNITED STATES AND PEARSON V. CALLAHAN.
- Published in:
- 2010
- By:
- Publication type:
- Opinion
47
DOCTRINES WITHOUT BORDERS: THE "NEW" ISRAELI EXCLUSIONARY RULE AND THE DANGERS OF LEGAL TRANSPLANTATION.
- Published in:
- Stanford Law Review, 2008, v. 60, n. 6, p. 2131
- By:
- Publication type:
- Article
48
Congressional Searches and Seizures: The Place of Legislative Privilege.
- Published in:
- Journal of Law & Politics, 2008, v. 24, n. 3, p. 271
- By:
- Publication type:
- Article
49
DAVIS v. UNITED STATES: GOOD FAITH, RETROACTIVITY, AND THE LOSS OF PRINCIPLE.
- Published in:
- Maryland Law Review, 2012, v. 71, n. 4, p. 1258
- By:
- Publication type:
- Article
50
Hudson v. Michigan and the decline of the exclusionary rule.
- Published in:
- Police Practice & Research, 2012, v. 13, n. 3, p. 282, doi. 10.1080/15614263.2011.627740
- By:
- Publication type:
- Article