Works matching United States. Solicitor General
1
- Yale Law Journal, 2011, v. 121, n. 3, p. 725
- Article
4
- Presidential Studies Quarterly, 2019, v. 49, n. 4, p. 855, doi. 10.1111/psq.12593
- Hansford, Thomas G.;
- Depaoli, Sarah;
- Canelo, Kayla S.
- Article
5
- Political Research Quarterly, 2013, v. 66, n. 2, p. 454, doi. 10.1177/1065912912447995
- Black, Ryan C.;
- Owens, Ryan J.
- Article
6
- Columbia Journal of Law & the Arts, 2024, v. 47, n. 3, p. 513, doi. 10.52214/jla.v47i3.13088
- Article
7
- Journal of Taxation & Regulation of Financial Institutions, 2016, v. 29, n. 5, p. 41
- PETRASIC, KEVIN;
- LEE, HELEN;
- LAMBERTH, KATHERINE
- Article
9
- 2013
- SCALIA, ANTONIN;
- CALABRESI, STEVEN G.;
- HARRISON, JOHN;
- REYNOLDS, WILLIAM BRADFORD
- Obituary
10
- Charleston Law Review, 2010, v. 5, n. 1, p. 59
- Article
11
- American University Journal of Gender, Social Policy & the Law, 2017, v. 25, n. 1, p. 31
- MIKA (NÉE MULLINS), JENNIFER CRYSTAL
- Article
12
- New York University Law Review, 2013, v. 88, n. 5, p. 1600
- Article
13
- Case Western Reserve Law Review, 2012, v. 62, n. 3, p. 879
- Article
15
- Criminal Justice Policy Review, 2015, v. 26, n. 8, p. 773, doi. 10.1177/0887403414544954
- Article
16
- Journal of Marketing, 1989, v. 53, n. 3, p. 105
- Article
17
- University of Pennsylvania Law Review, 2020, v. 168, n. 6, p. 1469
- EPPS, DANIEL;
- ORTMAN, WILLIAM
- Article
18
- Constitutional Political Economy, 2019, v. 30, n. 2, p. 194, doi. 10.1007/s10602-018-09271-1
- Article
19
- Arizona State Law Journal, 2013, v. 45, n. 3, p. 1183
- Article
20
- Antitrust Law Journal, 2014, v. 79, n. 3, p. 855
- Article
22
- Ad Americam, 2013, v. 14, p. 81, doi. 10.12797/AdAmericam.14.2013.14.06
- Article
23
- Southern California Law Review, 2012, v. 85, n. 3, p. 429
- ORBACH, BARAK;
- SOKOL, D. DANIEL
- Article
24
- University of Chicago Law Review, 2013, v. 80, n. 2, p. 859
- Devinsf, Neal;
- Prakash, Saikrishna B.
- Article
25
- Review of Public Data Use, 1978, v. 6, n. 6, p. 27
- Evans, John L.;
- Leger, Gerald J.
- Article
26
- American Journal of Legal History, 2015, v. 55, n. 2, p. 208, doi. 10.1093/ajlh/55.2.208
- Article
28
- NARF Legal Review, 2015, v. 40, n. 1, p. 6
- Article
30
- Journal of Supreme Court History, 2017, v. 42, n. 1, p. 28, doi. 10.1353/sch.2017.0021
- Article
32
- Political Research Quarterly, 1998, v. 51, n. 2, p. 527, doi. 10.2307/449089
- Meinhold, Stephen S.;
- Shull, Steven A.
- Article
33
- Washington University Journal of Law & Policy, 2017, v. 54, p. 50
- Article
34
- Washington Law Review, 2009, v. 84, n. 2, p. 199
- Article
35
- Journal of Education, 1919, v. 89, n. 12, p. 325
- Article
36
- California Law Review, 1994, v. 82, n. 2, p. 255, doi. 10.2307/3480978
- Article
37
- Tax Lawyer, 2020, v. 73, n. 3, p. 435
- Article
39
- Ratio Juris, 2015, v. 28, n. 1, p. 127, doi. 10.1111/raju.12069
- Bassham, Gregory;
- Oakley, Ian
- Article
41
- American Bar Association Journal, 1983, v. 69, n. 6, p. 734
- Article
42
- American Bar Association Journal, 1978, v. 64, n. 9, p. 1330
- Article
43
- American Bar Association Journal, 1977, v. 63, n. 9, p. 1190
- Article
44
- American Bar Association Journal, 1975, v. 61, n. 1, p. 90
- Article
46
- Hastings Center Report, 2012, v. 42, n. 5, p. 27, doi. 10.1002/hast.73
- Article
47
- Law & Contemporary Problems, 1998, v. 61, n. 1/2, p. 165, doi. 10.2307/1192386
- Article
48
- International Journal of Interdisciplinary Civic & Political Studies, 2015, v. 10, n. 4, p. 21, doi. 10.18848/2327-0071/cgp/v10i04/53153
- Ignagni, Joseph;
- Deen, Rebecca E.
- Article
50
- Antitrust Law Journal, 2014, v. 79, n. 3, p. 1017
- Article