Works matching United States. Sherman Act
1
- Vezetéstudomány / Budapest Management Review, 2014, v. 45, n. 5, p. 64, doi. 10.14267/veztud.2014.05.07
- Article
2
- Suffolk Transnational Law Review, 2015, v. 38, n. 2, p. 553
- Article
3
- European Competition Journal, 2012, v. 8, n. 2, p. 333, doi. 10.5235/ECJ.8.2.333
- Article
4
- American University Law Review, 2018, v. 68, n. 2, p. 621
- Article
5
- University of Pennsylvania Journal of Business Law, 2014, v. 16, n. 2, p. 497
- Article
6
- Competition Law International, 2011, v. 7, n. 2, p. 82
- Article
7
- Suffolk Transnational Law Review, 2012, v. 35, n. 1, p. 245
- Article
8
- St. Thomas Law Review, 2014, v. 26, n. 2, p. 165
- Article
9
- American University Journal of Gender, Social Policy & the Law, 2013, v. 21, n. 4, p. 919
- Article
10
- Virginia Sports & Entertainment Law Journal, 2013, v. 12, n. 2, p. 296
- Thomas, Cyntrice;
- Baker III, Thomas A.;
- Byon, Kevin
- Article
11
- Journal of Marketing, 1937, v. 1, n. 4, p. 326, doi. 10.2307/1246786
- Article
12
- Texas Review of Entertainment & Sports Law, 2021, v. 22, p. 125
- Article
13
- Texas Review of Entertainment & Sports Law, 2008, v. 9, n. 2, p. 281
- Article
14
- Journal of Science & Technology Law, 2015, v. 21, n. 1, p. 136
- Article
15
- UMKC Law Review, 2013, v. 82, n. 1, p. 255
- Article
16
- eLaw: Murdoch University Electronic Journal of Law, 2008, v. 15, n. 2, p. 275
- von Jenner, Mark Humphery
- Article
17
- Journal of College & University Law, 2013, v. 39, n. 1, p. 165
- Article
18
- Notre Dame Journal of Law, Ethics & Public Policy, 2019, v. 33, n. 2, p. 419
- Article
19
- American Journal of Legal History, 2013, v. 53, n. 4, p. 441, doi. 10.1093/ajlh/53.4.441
- Article
20
- University of San Francisco Law Review, 2014, v. 48, n. 3, p. 501
- Article
21
- Houston Journal of International Law, 2019, v. 41, n. 2, p. 387
- Article
22
- Seton Hall Journal of Sports & Entertainment Law, 2013, v. 23, n. 2, p. 345
- Hyne, Jason A.;
- Kurlantzick, Lewis
- Article
23
- Rutgers Law Journal, 2009, v. 41, n. 1/2, p. 187
- Article
24
- Ateneo Law Journal, 2011, v. 56, n. 2, p. 300
- Article
25
- European Competition Journal, 2012, v. 8, n. 2, p. 383, doi. 10.5235/ECJ.8.2.383
- Article
26
- University of Louisville Law Review, 2013, v. 52, n. 1, p. 67
- Article
27
- Penn State Law Review, 2024, v. 129, n. 1, p. 211
- Article
28
- Loyola of Los Angeles Law Review, 2022, v. 55, n. 4, p. 1167
- Article
29
- Loyola of Los Angeles Law Review, 2014, v. 47, n. 2, p. 563
- Article
30
- Loyola of Los Angeles Law Review, 2011, v. 44, n. 3, p. 1163
- Article
31
- Duquesne Law Review, 2016, v. 54, n. 2, p. 493
- Article
32
- Akron Law Review, 2016, v. 49, n. 2, p. 409
- Article
33
- Washington & Lee Law Review, 2016, v. 73, n. 1, p. 541
- Article
34
- Washington & Lee Law Review, 2016, v. 73, n. 1, p. 489
- Article
36
- Law & Contemporary Problems, 1965, v. 30, n. 3, p. 590, doi. 10.2307/1190824
- Article
37
- Law & Contemporary Problems, 1950, v. 15, n. 4, p. 473, doi. 10.2307/1189882
- Article
38
- Law & Contemporary Problems, 1950, v. 15, n. 2, p. 258, doi. 10.2307/1189850
- Article
39
- Law & Contemporary Problems, 1947, v. 12, n. 3, p. 470, doi. 10.2307/1190039
- Article
40
- Law & Contemporary Problems, 1940, v. 7, n. 1, p. 42, doi. 10.2307/1189687
- Article
41
- Law & Contemporary Problems, 1940, v. 7, n. 1, p. 24, doi. 10.2307/1189686
- Article
42
- Law & Contemporary Problems, 1940, v. 7, n. 1, p. 5, doi. 10.2307/1189685
- Article
43
- Columbia Journal of Transnational Law, 2011, v. 50, n. 1, p. 216
- Article
44
- Antitrust Bulletin, 2013, v. 58, n. 1, p. 129, doi. 10.1177/0003603X1305800105
- DOANE, MICHAEL J.;
- FARRIS, PAUL W.;
- KUCUK, S. UMIT;
- MADDUX, ROBERT C.
- Article
45
- Antitrust Bulletin, 2011, v. 56, n. 3, p. 525, doi. 10.1177/0003603X1105600302
- Connor, John M.;
- Miller, Douglas J.
- Article
46
- Antitrust Bulletin, 2009, v. 54, n. 2, p. 233, doi. 10.1177/0003603X0905400201
- Article
47
- Journal of Dispute Resolution, 2013, v. 2013, n. 2, p. 429
- Article
48
- Hofstra Law Review, 2016, v. 45, n. 2, p. 573
- Article
49
- Hofstra Law Review, 2012, v. 40, n. 4, p. 1099
- Article
50
- Brooklyn Law Review, 2010, v. 75, n. 3, p. 975
- Article