Works matching United States. Sherman Act
1
- Vezetéstudomány / Budapest Management Review, 2014, v. 45, n. 5, p. 64, doi. 10.14267/veztud.2014.05.07
- Article
2
- Suffolk Transnational Law Review, 2015, v. 38, n. 2, p. 553
- Article
3
- University of Pennsylvania Journal of Business Law, 2014, v. 16, n. 2, p. 497
- Article
4
- American University Law Review, 2018, v. 68, n. 2, p. 621
- Article
5
- European Competition Journal, 2012, v. 8, n. 2, p. 333, doi. 10.5235/ECJ.8.2.333
- Article
7
- UMKC Law Review, 2013, v. 82, n. 1, p. 255
- Article
8
- Virginia Sports & Entertainment Law Journal, 2013, v. 12, n. 2, p. 296
- Thomas, Cyntrice;
- Baker III, Thomas A.;
- Byon, Kevin
- Article
9
- Texas Review of Entertainment & Sports Law, 2021, v. 22, p. 125
- Article
10
- Texas Review of Entertainment & Sports Law, 2008, v. 9, n. 2, p. 281
- Article
11
- Antitrust Bulletin, 2009, v. 54, n. 2, p. 233, doi. 10.1177/0003603X0905400201
- Article
12
- George Mason Law Review, 2020, v. 28, n. 1, p. 1
- Article
13
- George Mason Law Review, 2017, v. 24, n. 5, p. 1069
- Ginsburg, Douglas H.;
- Taladay, John M.
- Article
14
- George Mason Law Review, 2014, v. 21, n. 5, p. 1251
- Jurata Jr., John "Jay";
- Patel, Amisha R.
- Article
15
- American University Journal of Gender, Social Policy & the Law, 2013, v. 21, n. 4, p. 919
- Article
16
- Southern California Law Review, 2012, v. 85, n. 3, p. 573
- Article
17
- Southern California Law Review, 2012, v. 85, n. 3, p. 815
- Article
18
- eLaw: Murdoch University Electronic Journal of Law, 2008, v. 15, n. 2, p. 275
- von Jenner, Mark Humphery
- Article
19
- Brooklyn Law Review, 2010, v. 75, n. 3, p. 975
- Article
20
- Notre Dame Journal of Law, Ethics & Public Policy, 2019, v. 33, n. 2, p. 419
- Article
21
- American Journal of Legal History, 2013, v. 53, n. 4, p. 441, doi. 10.1093/ajlh/53.4.441
- Article
22
- Penn State Law Review, 2024, v. 129, n. 1, p. 211
- Article
23
- Akron Law Review, 2016, v. 49, n. 2, p. 409
- Article
24
- Seton Hall Journal of Sports & Entertainment Law, 2013, v. 23, n. 2, p. 345
- Hyne, Jason A.;
- Kurlantzick, Lewis
- Article
25
- Minnesota Law Review, 2021, v. 105, n. 5, p. 2095
- Article
26
- Law & Contemporary Problems, 1950, v. 15, n. 4, p. 473, doi. 10.2307/1189882
- Article
27
- Law & Contemporary Problems, 1950, v. 15, n. 2, p. 258, doi. 10.2307/1189850
- Article
28
- Law & Contemporary Problems, 1947, v. 12, n. 3, p. 470, doi. 10.2307/1190039
- Article
29
- Law & Contemporary Problems, 1940, v. 7, n. 1, p. 42, doi. 10.2307/1189687
- Article
30
- Law & Contemporary Problems, 1940, v. 7, n. 1, p. 24, doi. 10.2307/1189686
- Article
31
- Law & Contemporary Problems, 1940, v. 7, n. 1, p. 5, doi. 10.2307/1189685
- Article
32
- Indiana Law Review, 2016, v. 49, n. 3, p. 793, doi. 10.18060/4806.0107
- Article
33
- Journal of College & University Law, 2013, v. 39, n. 1, p. 165
- Article
34
- Competition Law International, 2011, v. 7, n. 2, p. 82
- Article
35
- Antitrust Bulletin, 2013, v. 58, n. 1, p. 129, doi. 10.1177/0003603X1305800105
- DOANE, MICHAEL J.;
- FARRIS, PAUL W.;
- KUCUK, S. UMIT;
- MADDUX, ROBERT C.
- Article
36
- Antitrust Bulletin, 2011, v. 56, n. 3, p. 525, doi. 10.1177/0003603X1105600302
- Connor, John M.;
- Miller, Douglas J.
- Article
37
- Journal of Science & Technology Law, 2015, v. 21, n. 1, p. 136
- Article
38
- European Competition Journal, 2012, v. 8, n. 2, p. 383, doi. 10.5235/ECJ.8.2.383
- Article
39
- University of Louisville Law Review, 2013, v. 52, n. 1, p. 67
- Article
40
- Loyola of Los Angeles Law Review, 2022, v. 55, n. 4, p. 1167
- Article
41
- Loyola of Los Angeles Law Review, 2014, v. 47, n. 2, p. 563
- Article
42
- Loyola of Los Angeles Law Review, 2011, v. 44, n. 3, p. 1163
- Article
43
- Houston Journal of International Law, 2019, v. 41, n. 2, p. 387
- Article
44
- Journal of Competition Law & Economics, 2019, v. 15, n. 2, p. 159, doi. 10.1093/joclec/nhz011
- Article
45
- Washington University Journal of Law & Policy, 2017, v. 53, p. 21
- Article
46
- Washington University Journal of Law & Policy, 2011, v. 36, p. 289
- Article
47
- Temple Law Review, 2012, v. 84, n. 4, p. 995
- Article
48
- Duquesne Law Review, 2016, v. 54, n. 2, p. 493
- Article
49
- Revista de Derecho Puertorriqueño, 2013, v. 53, n. 1, p. 183
- Article
50
- University of San Francisco Law Review, 2014, v. 48, n. 3, p. 501
- Article