美國聯邦憲法增修條文第4條搜索令狀原則的新發展：以Jones, Jardines & Grady案為例.
- Published in:
- EurAmerica, 2018, v. 48, n. 2, p. 267
- By:
- Publication type:
- Article
Works matching United States. Constitution. 4th Amendment
Results: 1293
1
2
TEÓRIE PÔVODNÉHO VÝZNAMU ŠTVRTÉHO DODATKU ÚSTAVY SPOJENÝCH ŠTÁTOV AMERICKÝCH.
- Published in:
- Political Sciences / Politické Vedy, 2019, v. 22, n. 1, p. 229, doi. 10.24040/politickevedy.2019.22.1.229-246
- By:
- Publication type:
- Article
3
法律如何回應科技發展 的挑戰 ──基於美國最高法院憲法 第四修正案判例的研究.
- Published in:
- Financial & Economic Law Review, 2024, n. 49, p. 75, doi. 10.53106/1815008X494
- By:
- Publication type:
- Article
4
THE FOURTH AMENDMENT AND NEW TECHNOLOGIES: THE MISAPPLICATION OF ANALOGICAL REASONING.
- Published in:
- Southern Illinois University Law Journal, 2012, v. 36, n. 3, p. 475
- By:
- Publication type:
- Article
5
STRIKING A BALANCE: WHY OHIO'S FELONY-ARRESTEE DNA STATUTE IS UNCONSTITUTIONAL AND RIPE FOR LEGISLATIVE REVISION.
- Published in:
- Cleveland State Law Review, 2013, v. 61, n. 2, p. 529
- By:
- Publication type:
- Article
6
遗传基因信息的私人财产性法律保护证成.
- Published in:
- Cyber Security & Data Governance, 2024, v. 43, n. 11, p. 110, doi. 10.19358/j.issn.2097-1788.2024.11.017
- By:
- Publication type:
- Article
7
Drones and Jones: The Fourth Amendment and Police Discretion in the Digital Age.
- Published in:
- California Law Review, 2014, v. 102, n. 3, p. 729
- By:
- Publication type:
- Article
8
In Utah, Scanning a Person's Face or Iris to Determine Identity is a Search Justified Only in Limited Circumstances.
- Published in:
- Utah Bar Journal, 2011, v. 24, n. 6, p. 16
- By:
- Publication type:
- Article
9
ELECTRONIC SNOOPS, SPIES, AND SUPERVISORY SURVEILLANCE IN THE WORKPLACE.
- Published in:
- Southern Law Journal, 2013, v. 23, n. 1, p. 1
- By:
- Publication type:
- Article
10
A NEW ERA: DIGITAL CURTILAGE AND ALEXA-ENABLED SMART HOME DEVICES.
- Published in:
- Touro Law Review, 2020, v. 36, n. 2, p. 663
- By:
- Publication type:
- Article
11
THE FOURTH AMENDMENT AND DRIVING WHILE INTOXICATED: WHEN DOES A POLICE OFFICER NEED A WARRANT?
- Published in:
- Touro Law Review, 2017, v. 33, n. 3, p. 1167
- By:
- Publication type:
- Article
12
ADMINISTRATIVE INSPECTIONS: THE LOOPHOLE IN THE FOURTH AMENDMENT.
- Published in:
- Touro Law Review, 2015, v. 31, n. 4, p. 829
- By:
- Publication type:
- Article
13
POT IN MY BACKYARD: CURTILAGE CONCEPT ENDORSED BY THE QUEENS SUPREME COURT TO SUPPRESS PHYSICAL EVIDENCE OF MARIJUANA.
- Published in:
- Touro Law Review, 2015, v. 31, n. 4, p. 811
- By:
- Publication type:
- Article
14
WHEN DOES FORCE BECOME EXCESSIVE?
- Published in:
- Touro Law Review, 2015, v. 31, n. 4, p. 851
- By:
- Publication type:
- Article
15
FOURTH AMENDMENT RIGHT TO PRIVACY: WHEN IS IT REASONABLE TO SEARCH A MINOR?
- Published in:
- Touro Law Review, 2015, v. 31, n. 4, p. 791
- By:
- Publication type:
- Article
16
FOURTH AMENDMENT INQUIRIES: WHEN OFFICERS ARE NOT JUSTIFIED TO APPROACH A VEHICLE.
- Published in:
- Touro Law Review, 2015, v. 31, n. 4, p. 769
- By:
- Publication type:
- Article
17
JUSTIFICATION FOR POLICE INTRUSIONS.
- Published in:
- Touro Law Review, 2014, v. 30, n. 4, p. 1101
- By:
- Publication type:
- Article
18
INTERPRETING SEARCH INCIDENT TO ARREST IN NEW YORK: PAST, PRESENT, AND FUTURE.
- Published in:
- Touro Law Review, 2014, v. 30, n. 4, p. 1071
- By:
- Publication type:
- Article
19
A BALANCING ACT: FOURTH AMENDMENT PROTECTIONS AND THE REASONABLE SCOPE OF GOVERNMENT INVESTIGATORY ACCESS TO E-MAIL ACCOUNTS.
- Published in:
- St. John's Law Review, 2016, v. 90, n. 2, p. 495
- By:
- Publication type:
- Article
20
PERMANENT STATES OF EXCEPTION: A TWO-TIERED SYSTEM OF CRIMINAL JUSTICE COURTESY OF THE DOUBLE GOVERNMENT WARS ON CRIME, DRUGS & TERROR.
- Published in:
- Valparaiso University Law Review, 2016, v. 50, n. 2, p. 419
- By:
- Publication type:
- Article
21
SAY AAH! MARYLAND V. KING DEFINES REASONABLE STANDARD FOR DNA SEARCHES.
- Published in:
- 2015
- By:
- Publication type:
- Opinion
22
USING THE DNA TESTING OF ARRESTEES TO REEVALUATE FOURTH AMENDMENT DOCTRINE.
- Published in:
- Valparaiso University Law Review, 2015, v. 49, n. 3, p. 659
- By:
- Publication type:
- Article
23
THE AERIAL DRAGNET: A DRONE-ING NEED FOR FOURTH AMENDMENT CHANGE.
- Published in:
- Valparaiso University Law Review, 2014, v. 49, n. 1, p. 219
- By:
- Publication type:
- Article
24
UNITED STATES V. JONES: THE FOOLISH REVIVAL OF THE "TRESPASS DOCTRINE" IN ADDRESSING GPS TECHNOLOGY AND THE FOURTH AMENDMENT.
- Published in:
- 2013
- By:
- Publication type:
- Opinion
25
BABOON HEARTS AND PIG LIVERS: ANTICIPATING THE FUTURE OF XENOTRANSPLANTATION AND ITS LEGAL RESPONSES.
- Published in:
- Jurimetrics: The Journal of Law, Science & Technology, 2023, v. 63, n. 4, p. 405
- By:
- Publication type:
- Article
26
Too big to surveil: the fourth amendment illuminated by 'modern lights' and shadowed by obsta principiis in a post-Carpenter world concerned with privacy.
- Published in:
- Information & Communications Technology Law, 2019, v. 28, n. 2, p. 161, doi. 10.1080/13600834.2019.1600458
- By:
- Publication type:
- Article
27
SECTION 702 AND THE COLLECTION OF INTERNATIONAL TELEPHONE AND INTERNET CONTENT.
- Published in:
- Harvard Journal of Law & Public Policy, 2015, v. 38, n. 1, p. 117
- By:
- Publication type:
- Article
28
PREFACE.
- Published in:
- Harvard Journal of Law & Public Policy, 2015, v. 38, n. 1, p. i
- By:
- Publication type:
- Article
29
LOOKING BACK TO LOOK FORWARD: REEXAMINING THE APPLICATION OF THE THIRD-PARTY DOCTRINE TO CONVEYED PAPERS.
- Published in:
- Harvard Journal of Law & Public Policy, 2014, v. 37, n. 1, p. 329
- By:
- Publication type:
- Article
30
ENDING THE ZERO-SUM GAME: HOW TO INCREASE THE PRODUCTIVITY OF THE FOURTH AMENDMENT.
- Published in:
- Harvard Journal of Law & Public Policy, 2013, v. 36, n. 2, p. 549
- By:
- Publication type:
- Article
31
FOREWORD: ACCOUNTING FOR TECHNOLOGICAL CHANGE.
- Published in:
- Harvard Journal of Law & Public Policy, 2013, v. 36, n. 2, p. 404
- By:
- Publication type:
- Article
32
PREFACE.
- Published in:
- Harvard Journal of Law & Public Policy, 2013, v. 36, n. 2, p. 404
- By:
- Publication type:
- Article
33
數位隱私與國際趨勢.
- Published in:
- Journal of Education Research (1680-6360), 2020, n. 309, p. 115, doi. 10.3966/168063602020010309007
- By:
- Publication type:
- Article
34
IS IGNORANCE OF THE LAW AN EXCUSE FOR THE POLICE TO VIOLATE THE FOURTH AMENDMENT?
- Published in:
- New York University Journal of Law & Liberty, 2015, v. 9, n. 1, p. 108
- By:
- Publication type:
- Article
35
AGREEMENT AT THE SUPREME COURT: THE THREE IMPORTANT PRINCIPLES UNDERLYING RILEY V. CALIFORNIA.
- Published in:
- 2015
- By:
- Publication type:
- Essay
36
SYMPOSIUM ON CYBERCRIME.
- Published in:
- Journal of Criminal Law & Criminology, 2013, v. 103, n. 3, p. 663
- By:
- Publication type:
- Article
37
"DEAREST PROPERTY": DIGITAL EVIDENCE AND THE HISTORY OF PRIVATE "PAPERS" AS SPECIAL OBJECTS OF SEARCH AND SEIZURE.
- Published in:
- Journal of Criminal Law & Criminology, 2013, v. 103, n. 1, p. 49
- By:
- Publication type:
- Article
38
OMG--Not Something to LOL About: The Unintended Results of Disallowing Warrantless Searches of Cell Phones Incident to a Lawful Arrest.
- Published in:
- BYU Journal of Public Law, 2017, v. 31, n. 2, p. 437
- By:
- Publication type:
- Article
39
Swearing by New Technology: Strengthening the Fourth Amendment by Utilizing Modern Warrant Technology While Satisfying the Oath or Affirmation Clause.
- Published in:
- Brigham Young University Law Review, 2014, v. 2014, n. 4, p. 927
- By:
- Publication type:
- Article
40
WHAT HATH 9/11 WROUGHT?
- Published in:
- 2012
- By:
- Publication type:
- Essay
41
Checked In: Decreasing Fourth Amendment Protection Against Real-time Geolocation Surveillance.
- Published in:
- University of Memphis Law Review, 2015, v. 45, n. 3, p. 561
- By:
- Publication type:
- Article
42
Kansas Law Review Criminal Procedure Survey 2016.
- Published in:
- Kansas Law Review, 2016, v. 64, p. 5
- Publication type:
- Article
43
Kansas Law Review Criminal Procedure Survey.
- Published in:
- Kansas Law Review, 2012, p. 1257, doi. 10.17161/1808.20201
- Publication type:
- Article
44
Don't Daze, Phase, or Lase Me, Bro! Fourth Amendment Excessive-Force Claims, Future Nonlethal Weapons, and Why Requiring an Injury Cannot Withstand a Constitutional or Practical Challenge.
- Published in:
- Kansas Law Review, 2011, p. 139, doi. 10.17161/1808.20203
- By:
- Publication type:
- Article
45
Kansas Law Review Criminal Procedure Survey.
- Published in:
- Kansas Law Review, 2010, p. 1187, doi. 10.17161/1808.20141
- Publication type:
- Article
46
WHERE TO DRAW THE LINE: THE EGREGIOUSNESS STANDARD IN THE APPLICATION OF THE FOURTH AMENDMENT IN IMMIGRATION PROCEEDINGS AND THE RACIAL PROFILING EXCEPTION.
- Published in:
- George Mason University Civil Rights Law Journal, 2015, v. 26, n. 1, p. 87
- By:
- Publication type:
- Article
47
BREAKING AND ENTERING OR COMMUNITY CARETAKING? A SOLUTION TO THE OVERBROAD EXPANSION OF THE INVENTORY SEARCH.
- Published in:
- George Mason University Civil Rights Law Journal, 2012, v. 22, n. 2, p. 249
- By:
- Publication type:
- Article
48
UNREASONABLE SEIZURE: GOVERNMENT REMOVAL OF CHILDREN FROM HOMES WITH DRUGS BUT NO EVIDENCE OF NEGLECT.
- Published in:
- George Mason Law Review, 2013, v. 20, n. 2, p. 631
- By:
- Publication type:
- Article
49
CRITICAL LESSONS OF AL-KIDD: RESPECTING THE DIGNITY OF MATERIAL WITNESSES THROUGH THE SPECIAL NEEDS DOCTRINE.
- Published in:
- American University Journal of Gender, Social Policy & the Law, 2014, v. 22, n. 4, p. 947
- By:
- Publication type:
- Article
50
MOSAIC THEORY AND THE FOURTH AMENDMENT: HOW JONES CAN SAVE PRIVACY IN THE FACE OF EVOLVING TECHNOLOGY.
- Published in:
- American University Journal of Gender, Social Policy & the Law, 2011, v. 19, n. 4, p. 1351
- By:
- Publication type:
- Article