Works matching United States. Constitution. 14th Amendment
1
- Acta Universitatis Carolinae Iuridica, 2021, v. 67, n. 1, p. 7, doi. 10.14712/23366478.2021.1
- Article
2
- Citizenship Studies, 2024, v. 28, n. 2, p. 201, doi. 10.1080/13621025.2024.2336933
- Article
3
- Akron Law Review, 2013, v. 46, n. 1, p. 253
- Article
4
- American Journal of Criminal Justice, 1984, v. 9, n. 1, p. 1, doi. 10.1007/BF03373752
- Moore Jr., Richter H.;
- Moore, Susan R.
- Article
5
- Review of Law & Social Change, 2015, v. 39, n. 4, p. 419
- Article
6
- Review of Law & Social Change, 2013, v. 37, n. 1, p. 151
- Article
7
- Family Court Review, 2018, v. 56, n. 3, p. 490, doi. 10.1111/fcre.12367
- Article
8
- Southern Law Journal, 2013, v. 23, n. 1, p. 143
- Article
9
- NAELA Journal, 2014, v. 10, n. 2, p. 125
- Feinstein, Michele J.;
- Webber, David K.
- Article
10
- Texas Review of Law & Politics, 2012, v. 17, n. 1, p. 125
- GETCHELL JR., E. DUNCAN;
- BRADY, MICHAEL H.
- Article
11
- Texas Review of Law & Politics, 2009, v. 14, n. 1, p. 15
- Neily III, Clark M.;
- McNamara, Robert J.
- Article
13
- Transnational Law & Contemporary Problems, 2016, v. 26, n. 1, p. 3
- Article
14
- Touro Law Review, 2022, v. 38, n. 1, p. 283
- Article
15
- Touro Law Review, 2018, v. 34, n. 2, p. 649
- Article
16
- Touro Law Review, 2017, v. 33, n. 2, p. 633
- Article
17
- Touro Law Review, 2016, v. 32, n. 4, p. 899
- Article
18
- St. John's Law Review, 2022, v. 96, n. 3, p. 789
- Article
19
- St. John's Law Review, 2022, v. 94, n. 4, p. 1033
- Article
20
- St. John's Law Review, 2020, v. 94, n. 4, p. 1033
- Article
21
- St. John's Law Review, 2019, v. 93, n. 2, p. 293
- Article
22
- St. John's Law Review, 2015, v. 89, n. 1, p. 195
- Article
23
- St. John's Law Review, 2013, v. 87, n. 4, p. 1071
- Article
24
- St. John's Law Review, 2011, v. 85, n. 2, p. 1057
- Article
25
- Jurimetrics: The Journal of Law, Science & Technology, 2023, v. 63, n. 4, p. 405
- Article
26
- Gonzaga Law Review, 2011, v. 47, n. 2, p. 365
- Article
27
- Ohio State Journal on Dispute Resolution, 2012, v. 27, n. 1, p. 179
- Article
28
- Duke Journal of Gender Law & Policy, 2013, v. 21, n. 1, p. 227
- Article
29
- Harvard Journal of Law & Public Policy, 2019, v. 42, n. 1, p. 69
- Article
30
- Harvard Journal of Law & Public Policy, 2017, v. 40, n. 2, p. 539
- Article
31
- Harvard Journal of Law & Public Policy, 2011, v. 34, n. 3, p. 1117
- Article
33
- Harvard Journal of Law & Public Policy, 1996, v. 19, n. 2, p. 451
- Article
34
- Harvard Journal of Law & Public Policy, 1996, v. 19, n. 2, p. 443
- Article
35
- Journal of Affordable Housing & Community Development Law, 2015, v. 23, n. 2, p. 209
- Article
36
- Journal of Criminal Law & Criminology, 2018, v. 108, n. 3, p. 539
- Article
37
- BYU Journal of Public Law, 2011, v. 25, n. 1, p. 35
- Article
38
- Brigham Young University Law Review, 2017, v. 2017, n. 1, p. 167
- Article
39
- University of Memphis Law Review, 2011, v. 42, n. 1, p. 73
- Article
40
- University of Illinois Law Review, 2016, v. 2016, n. 4, p. 1651
- Article
41
- George Mason University Civil Rights Law Journal, 2013, v. 23, n. 2, p. 177
- Article
42
- George Mason Law Review, 2019, v. 26, n. 4, p. 1059
- Article
43
- George Mason Law Review, 2015, v. 22, n. 2, p. 259
- Article
44
- American University Journal of Gender, Social Policy & the Law, 2022, v. 30, n. 1, p. 57
- Article
45
- American University Journal of Gender, Social Policy & the Law, 2014, v. 22, n. 2, p. 485
- Article
46
- American University Journal of Gender, Social Policy & the Law, 2013, v. 21, n. 4, p. 797
- Article
47
- Southern California Law Review, 2014, v. 87, n. 3, p. 859
- Article
48
- Southern California Law Review, 2016, v. 89, n. 3, p. 601
- Article
50
- William & Mary Law Review, 2017, v. 58, n. 6, p. 2063
- Article