Works matching United States. Constitution. 13th Amendment
1
- California Law Review, 1951, v. 39, n. 2, p. 171, doi. 10.2307/3478033
- Article
2
- St. John's Law Review, 2015, v. 89, n. 2/3, p. 693
- Article
3
- Gonzaga Law Review, 2011, v. 47, n. 2, p. 365
- Article
4
- George Mason University Civil Rights Law Journal, 2013, v. 23, n. 3, p. 283
- Article
5
- American University Journal of Gender, Social Policy & the Law, 2015, v. 23, n. 4, p. 685
- Article
6
- Peace Review, 2011, v. 23, n. 3, p. 364, doi. 10.1080/10402659.2011.596075
- Article
7
- Journal of the West, 2020, v. 59, n. 1, p. 22
- Article
8
- Michigan Journal of Race & Law, 2019, v. 25, n. 1, p. 77, doi. 10.36643/mjrl.25.1.thirteenth
- Article
9
- Seattle University Law Review, 2016, v. 39, n. 3, p. 1009
- Article
10
- Seattle University Law Review, 2016, v. 39, n. 3, p. 983
- Article
11
- Seattle University Law Review, 2016, v. 39, n. 3, p. 957
- Article
12
- Seattle University Law Review, 2016, v. 39, n. 3, p. 901
- Article
13
- Seattle University Law Review, 2016, v. 39, n. 3, p. 847
- Article
15
- Seattle University Law Review, 2016, v. 39, n. 3, p. 813
- Article
16
- Seattle University Law Review, 2016, v. 39, n. 3, p. 659
- Article
17
- DePaul Law Review, 2012, v. 62, n. 1, p. 1
- Article
18
- Washington University Global Studies Law Review, 2014, v. 13, n. 4, p. 605
- GAMONAL, C. SERGIO;
- ROSADO MARZÁN, CÉSAR F.
- Article
20
- Ohio State Law Journal, 2021, v. 82, n. 6, p. 1039
- Article
22
- Maryland Law Review, 2011, v. 71, n. 1, p. 60
- Article
25
- Maryland Law Review, 2011, v. 71, n. 1, p. 21
- Article
26
- Maryland Law Review, 2011, v. 71, n. 1, p. 229
- Article
29
- Maryland Law Review, 2011, v. 71, n. 1, p. 163
- Article
30
- Maryland Law Review, 2011, v. 71, n. 1, p. 83
- Article
31
- Pennsylvania Magazine of History & Biography, 2011, v. 135, n. 4, p. 528, doi. 10.5215/pennmaghistbio.135.4.0528
- Article
32
- Oklahoma City University Law Review, 2011, v. 36, n. 3, p. 555
- Article
33
- UCLA Law Review, 2020, v. 67, n. 5, p. 1108
- Article
34
- Journal of Southern History, 2022, v. 88, n. 1, p. 5, doi. 10.1353/soh.2022.0000
- Article
35
- Pensamiento Constitucional, 2020, v. 25, n. 25, p. 11
- Article
36
- Poetry, 2022, v. 219, n. 5, p. 433
- Article
37
- St. Mary's Law Journal, 2021, v. 52, n. 4, p. 945
- Article
38
- Harvard Journal of Law & Gender, 2012, v. 35, n. 1, p. 263
- Article
39
- History Today, 2021, v. 71, n. 5, p. 42
- Article
40
- Virginia Law Review, 2016, v. 102, n. 2, p. 501
- Article
41
- BYU Journal of Public Law, 2017, v. 31, n. 2, p. 333
- Article
42
- Journal of Religion & Society, 2015, v. 17, p. 1
- Article
43
- Law & Philosophy, 1998, v. 17, n. 5/6, p. 533, doi. 10.1023/A:1006179322525
- Article
45
- Issues in Law & Medicine, 2010, v. 26, n. 2, p. 91
- Article
46
- Issues in Law & Medicine, 2010, v. 26, n. 2, p. iii
- Article
47
- Case Western Reserve Law Review, 1995, v. 45, n. 2, p. 641
- Article
48
- SMU Law Review, 2014, v. 67, n. 3, p. 671
- Article
49
- Air Force Law Review, 2015, v. 74, p. 201
- Article
50
- Nevada Law Journal, 2018, v. 19, n. 2, p. 413
- Article