Works matching United States. Constitution. 11th Amendment
1
- Vanderbilt Law Review, 2016, v. 69, n. 3, p. 761
- Article
2
- Ecology Law Quarterly, 2013, v. 40, n. 2, p. 443
- Article
3
- University of Chicago Law Review, 2019, v. 86, n. 6, p. 1603
- Article
4
- Alabama Law Review, 2014, v. 65, n. 2, p. 457
- Article
5
- South Carolina Law Review, 2012, v. 63, n. 4, p. 975
- Article
6
- University of Pennsylvania Journal of Constitutional Law, 2013, v. 16, n. 2, p. 443
- Article
7
- Lewis & Clark Law Review, 2015, v. 19, n. 2, p. 543
- Article
8
- New York University Journal of Legislation & Public Policy, 2014, v. 17, n. 3, p. 763
- Article
9
- Kentucky Libraries, 2013, v. 77, n. 3, p. 24
- Article
10
- Emory Law Journal, 2015, v. 64, n. 3, p. 819
- Article
11
- Virginia Law Review, 2016, v. 102, n. 1, p. 153
- Pfander, James E.;
- Dwinell, Jessica
- Article
12
- University of New Hampshire Law Review, 2017, v. 15, n. 2, p. 265
- Article
13
- Touro Law Review, 2015, v. 31, n. 2, p. 333
- Article
14
- Journal of Labor Research, 2003, v. 24, n. 4, p. 621, doi. 10.1007/s12122-003-1017-y
- Theodore Clark Jr., R.;
- Powers, James J.
- Article
15
- BYU Journal of Public Law, 2006, v. 20, n. 2, p. 387
- Article
16
- American Economic Review, 1996, v. 86, n. 1, p. 259
- Article
17
- William & Mary Law Review, 2009, v. 50, n. 5, p. 1577
- Article
18
- Michigan Law Review, 2007, v. 105, n. 4, p. 837
- Article
19
- Review of Litigation, 2000, v. 19, n. 2, p. 355
- Article
20
- Capital University Law Review, 2015, v. 43, n. 3, p. 585
- Article
21
- Constitutional Commentary, 1999, v. 16, n. 3, p. 575
- Article
22
- Georgia State University Law Review, 2022, v. 38, n. 2, p. 535
- Article
23
- Urban Lawyer, 2012, v. 44, n. 4, p. 915
- Article
24
- Tulane Environmental Law Journal, 2021, v. 34, n. 2, p. 385
- Article
25
- University of Memphis Law Review, 2017, v. 47, n. 4, p. 1147
- Article
26
- William & Mary Law Review, 2024, v. 65, n. 3, p. 485
- BELLIA JR., ANTHONY J.;
- CLARK, BRADFORD R.
- Article
27
- William & Mary Law Review, 2019, v. 60, n. 4, p. 1465
- PAGE, WILLIAM H.;
- LOPATKA, JOHN E.
- Article
28
- Creighton Law Review, 2016, v. 50, n. 1, p. 7
- Article
29
- Mercer Law Review, 2024, v. 76, n. 1, p. 523
- Article
30
- Mercer Law Review, 2020, v. 72, n. 1, p. 387
- Article
32
- Journal of Supreme Court History, 2020, v. 45, n. 2, p. 113, doi. 10.1353/sch.2020.0010
- Article
33
- Energy Law Journal, 2020, v. 41, n. 2, p. 403
- Article
34
- California Law Review, 1994, v. 82, n. 5, p. 1287, doi. 10.2307/3480911
- Article
35
- University of Pittsburgh Law Review, 2023, v. 84, n. 3, p. 665, doi. 10.5195/lawreview.2023.945
- Zwickel, Howard L.;
- Tenen, Evelyn M.
- Article
36
- St. Louis University Public Law Review, 2012, v. 31, n. 2, p. 383
- Article
37
- University of Pennsylvania Law Review, 2021, v. 169, n. 3, p. 609
- BAUDE, WILLIAM;
- SACHS, STEPHEN E.
- Article
38
- Virginia Law Review, 2017, v. 103, n. 8, p. 1861
- Article
39
- Boston College Law Review, 2022, v. 63, n. 4, p. 1517
- Article
40
- Appalachian Journal of Law, 2017, v. 17, n. 1, p. 111
- Article
41
- Politics & Policy, 2009, v. 37, n. 6, p. 1215, doi. 10.1111/j.1747-1346.2009.00218.x
- Article
42
- Law & Contemporary Problems, 1992, v. 55, n. 1, p. 201, doi. 10.2307/1191763
- Article