Works matching United States. Attorney-General
1
- Journal of Applied Economics & Policy, 2014, v. 32, n. 1, p. 45
- Dove, John A.;
- Dove, Laura R.
- Article
2
- University of San Francisco Law Review, 2013, v. 47, n. 4, p. 647
- Article
3
- Utah Bar Journal, 2015, v. 28, n. 2, p. 40
- Article
4
- Settler, 2012, v. 50, n. 2, p. 48
- Article
5
- Tulane Journal of International & Comparative Law, 2013, v. 21, n. 2, p. 617
- Article
6
- Georgia Historical Quarterly, 2024, v. 108, n. 1, p. 52
- Article
8
- 2010
- Rutkow, Lainie;
- Teret, Stephen P.
- Opinion
9
- Headache: The Journal of Head & Face Pain, 2002, v. 42, n. 7, p. 693, doi. 10.1046/j.1526-4610.2002.02161.x
- Article
10
- Federal Sentencing Reporter (University of California Press), 2014, v. 26, n. 4, p. 246, doi. 10.1525/fsr.2014.26.4.246
- Article
12
- Federal Sentencing Reporter (University of California Press), 2014, v. 26, n. 4, p. 217, doi. 10.1525/fsr.2014.26.4.217
- Article
13
- Federal Sentencing Reporter (University of California Press), 2013, v. 26, n. 2, p. 88, doi. 10.1525/fsr.2013.26.2.88
- Article
14
- Federal Sentencing Reporter (University of California Press), 2013, v. 26, n. 2, p. 86, doi. 10.1525/fsr.2013.26.2.86
- Article
16
- Law & Contemporary Problems, 1942, v. 9, n. 4, p. 701, doi. 10.2307/1190085
- Article
17
- Ohio State Law Journal, 2020, v. 81, n. 2, p. 315
- Article
19
- Government Technology, 2014, v. 27, n. 6, p. 40
- Article
20
- Radiation Protection & Environment, 2020, v. 43, n. 3/4, p. 185, doi. 10.4103/rpe.RPE_31_20
- Article
21
- Journal of Supreme Court History, 2019, v. 44, n. 1, p. 90, doi. 10.1353/sch.2019.0023
- Article
22
- Journal of Supreme Court History, 2013, v. 38, n. 2, p. 168, doi. 10.1353/sch.2013.0015
- Article
25
- CounterPunch, 2017, v. 24, n. 5, p. 14
- Article
26
- Bench & Bar of Minnesota, 2024, v. 81, n. 9, p. 5
- Article
27
- Minnesota Law Review, 2012, v. 96, n. 5, p. 1795
- Article
28
- Administrative Law Review, 2019, v. 71, n. 1, p. 251
- Article
29
- Bifocal, 2011, p. 57
- Article
30
- Bifocal, 2011, v. 32, n. 4, p. 57
- Article
31
- Vermont Law Review, 2017, v. 41, n. 3, p. 465
- Article
33
- American Journal of Health-System Pharmacy, 2002, v. 59, n. 2, p. 120, doi. 10.1093/ajhp/59.2.120
- Article
34
- Economic Inquiry, 2013, v. 51, n. 1, p. 997, doi. 10.1111/j.1465-7295.2012.00477.x
- FEINBERG, ROBERT M.;
- HUSTED, THOMAS A.
- Article
35
- Ohio State Technology Law Journal, 2021, v. 17, n. 1, p. 467
- Article
36
- Columbia Journal of Gender & Law, 2020, v. 39, n. 2, p. 140
- Article
38
- American Studies (00263079), 2021, v. 60, n. 1, p. 81, doi. 10.1353/ams.2021.0004
- Article
39
- Settler, 2021, v. 59, n. 2, p. 36
- Article
40
- Journal of Legal Studies Education, 2023, v. 40, n. 2, p. 145, doi. 10.1111/jlse.12135
- Article
41
- South Dakota History, 2021, v. 51, n. 1, p. 81
- Article
42
- South Dakota History, 2021, v. 51, n. 1, p. 80
- Article
43
- South Dakota History, 2021, v. 51, n. 1, p. 1
- Article
44
- We Proceeded On, 2024, v. 50, n. 2, p. 4
- Article
45
- European Journal on Criminal Policy & Research, 1996, v. 4, n. 2, p. 119, doi. 10.1007/BF02731605
- Article
46
- Federal Reserve Bulletin, 2022, v. 108, n. 1, p. 13
- Article
47
- Federal Reserve Bulletin, 2021, v. 107, n. 3, p. 49
- Article
48
- Indiana Health Law Review, 2024, v. 21, n. 1, p. 60, doi. 10.18060/28379
- Article
49
- Pennsylvania Mennonite Heritage, 2024, v. 47, n. 1, p. 2
- Article
50
- Business & Politics, 2014, v. 16, n. 2, p. 291, doi. 10.1515/bap-2013-0032
- Article