Works matching United States v. Lopez
1
- California Law Review, 2000, v. 88, n. 5, p. 1575, doi. 10.2307/3481266
- Article
2
- Case Western Reserve Law Review, 1996, v. 46, n. 3, p. 757
- Article
3
- Publius: The Journal of Federalism, 1996, v. 26, n. 3, p. 109, doi. 10.1093/oxfordjournals.pubjof.a029858
- Palmer, Kenneth T.;
- Laverty, Edward B.
- Article
4
- Harvard Journal of Law & Public Policy, 1995, v. 19, n. 1, p. 161
- Article
5
- Kansas Law Review, 2014, v. 62, p. 195
- Article
6
- Southern Illinois University Law Journal, 2015, v. 39, n. 3, p. 391
- Article
7
- Golden Gate University Law Review, 2011, v. 42, n. 1, p. 77
- Article
8
- Suffolk Transnational Law Review, 2020, v. 43, n. 1, p. 185
- Article
9
- Washburn Law Journal, 2012, v. 52, n. 1, p. 23
- Article
10
- Washburn Law Journal, 2012, v. 52, n. 1, p. 1
- Article
11
- North Carolina Law Review, 2015, v. 94, n. 1, p. 7
- MAZZONE, JASON;
- WOOCK, CARL EMERY
- Article
12
- University of Pennsylvania Law Review, 2008, v. 157, n. 2, p. 617
- Article
13
- Case Western Reserve Law Review, 2016, v. 67, n. 2, p. 337
- Article
14
- Case Western Reserve Law Review, 1997, v. 47, n. 3, p. 921
- Litman, Harry;
- Greenberg, Mark D.
- Article
15
- Case Western Reserve Law Review, 1996, v. 46, n. 3, p. 935
- Article
16
- Case Western Reserve Law Review, 1996, v. 46, n. 3, p. 885
- Article
17
- Case Western Reserve Law Review, 1996, v. 46, n. 3, p. 877
- Article
18
- Case Western Reserve Law Review, 1996, v. 46, n. 3, p. 845
- Article
19
- Case Western Reserve Law Review, 1996, v. 46, n. 3, p. 801
- Article
20
- Case Western Reserve Law Review, 1996, v. 46, n. 3, p. 731
- Article
21
- Case Western Reserve Law Review, 1996, v. 46, n. 3, p. 694
- Article
22
- Case Western Reserve Law Review, 1996, v. 46, n. 3, p. 685
- Article
23
- Case Western Reserve Law Review, 1996, v. 46, n. 3, p. 671
- Article
24
- Case Western Reserve Law Review, 1996, v. 46, n. 3, p. 663
- Article
25
- Case Western Reserve Law Review, 1996, v. 46, n. 3, p. 643
- Article
26
- San Diego Law Review, 2007, v. 44, n. 3, p. 525
- Article
27
- Brookings Review, 1995, v. 13, n. 3, p. 52, doi. 10.2307/20080584
- Article
28
- Journal of Transnational Law & Policy, 2012, v. 21, p. 207
- Article
29
- Capital University Law Review, 2013, v. 41, n. 1, p. 133
- Article
30
- Cumberland Law Review, 2015, v. 45, n. 3, p. 487
- Article
31
- Cleveland State Law Review, 2017, v. 65, n. 2, p. 129
- Article
32
- George Mason Law Review, 2012, v. 19, n. 4, p. 873
- Article
33
- Journal of Law & Education, 2019, v. 48, n. 2, p. 297
- Article
34
- Constitutional Commentary, 2018, v. 33, n. 2, p. 145
- Article
35
- BYU Journal of Public Law, 1997, v. 11, n. 2, p. 183
- Article
36
- Mitchell Hamline Law Review, 2023, v. 49, n. 2, p. 316
- Article
37
- Journal of Law, Economics & Organization, 2016, v. 32, n. 2, p. 272, doi. 10.1093/jleo/ewv030
- Article
38
- William & Mary Law Review, 1997, v. 38, n. 2, p. 677
- Article
39
- Villanova Law Review, 2017, v. 62, n. 1, p. 81
- Article
40
- Cleveland State Law Review, 2013, v. 61, n. 3, p. 745
- Article
41
- Harvard Journal of Law & Public Policy, 2006, v. 30, n. 1, p. 451
- Article
42
- Political Research Quarterly, 1996, v. 49, n. 2, p. 415, doi. 10.2307/448881
- Article
43
- Publius: The Journal of Federalism, 1998, v. 28, n. 2, p. 25, doi. 10.1093/oxfordjournals.pubjof.a029967
- Swinford, Bill;
- Waltenburg, Eric N.
- Article
44
- University of Pennsylvania Journal of Constitutional Law, 2017, v. 19, n. 3, p. 567
- Article
45
- Albany Law Review, 2003, v. 66, n. 4, p. 1197
- Article
46
- Faulkner Law Review, 2012, v. 4, n. 1, p. 1
- Article
47
- Harvard Environmental Law Review, 2003, v. 27, n. 1, p. 1
- Article
48
- Texas Journal on Civil Liberties & Civil Rights, 2006, v. 11, n. 2, p. 185
- Article
49
- William & Mary Law Review, 2023, v. 65, n. 1, p. 79
- DENNING, BRANNON P.;
- REYNOLDS, GLENN H.
- Article
50
- William & Mary Law Review, 2022, v. 63, n. 6, p. 2091
- Article