Works matching United States appellate courts
1
- Journal of the Legal Profession, 2016, v. 40, n. 2, p. 215
- Article
3
- Federal Sentencing Reporter (University of California Press), 2012, v. 24, n. 4, p. 308, doi. 10.1525/fsr.2012.24.4.308
- Article
4
- Minnesota Law Review, 2015, v. 99, n. 3, p. 1195
- Article
5
- Missouri Law Review, 2011, v. 76, n. 2, p. 315
- Article
6
- University of Toledo Law Review, 2014, v. 45, n. 4, p. 747
- Article
7
- University of Toledo Law Review, 2014, v. 45, n. 4, p. 733
- Article
8
- University of San Francisco Maritime Law Journal, 2014, v. 26, n. 2, p. 269
- SIMMET, LEAH;
- MILLER, REID;
- SONMEZ, ELİF;
- VIVEROS, TIFFANY
- Article
9
- University of San Francisco Maritime Law Journal, 2012, v. 24, n. 2, p. 293
- Article
10
- Creighton Law Review, 2018, v. 52, n. 1, p. 1
- Article
11
- Creighton Law Review, 2015, v. 48, n. 2, p. 371
- Article
12
- Energy Law Journal, 2015, v. 36, n. 1, p. 1
- Article
13
- Scribes Journal of Legal Writing, 2008, v. 12, p. 99
- Article
14
- St. Louis University Law Journal, 2012, v. 56, n. 4, p. 1319
- Article
16
- Utah Bar Journal, 2018, v. 31, n. 4, p. 42
- Parker, Rodney R.;
- Cepernich, Dani N.;
- Elder, Scott A.;
- Mitchell, Nathanael J.;
- Pace, Adam M.
- Article
17
- Utah Bar Journal, 2013, v. 26, n. 3, p. 32
- Parker, Rodney R.;
- Blanch, Julianne P.
- Article
18
- Akron Law Review, 2017, v. 50, n. 3, p. 575
- Article
19
- Federal Sentencing Reporter (University of California Press), 2015, v. 27, n. 3, p. 143, doi. 10.1525/fsr.2015.27.3.143
- Article
21
- Denver University Law Review, 2012, v. 89, n. 2, p. 395
- Article
22
- American Journal of Comparative Law, 2014, v. 62, n. 2, p. 223, doi. 10.5131/AJCL.2014.0001
- Article
23
- Harvard Law & Policy Review, 2011, v. 5, n. 2, p. 289
- Warshaw, Christopher;
- Wannier, Gregory E.
- Article
24
- Alabama Lawyer, 2014, v. 75, n. 5, p. 326
- Green, Wilson F.;
- Starrett, Marc A.
- Article
25
- Alabama Lawyer, 2014, v. 75, n. 4, p. 258
- Green, Wilson F.;
- Starrett, Marc A.
- Article
26
- Connecticut Bar Journal, 2013, v. 87, n. 3, p. 185
- KNOX, KIMBERLY A.;
- LEVESQUE, BRENDON P.
- Article
28
- Brooklyn Law Review, 2011, v. 76, n. 3, p. 967
- Article
29
- Advocate (05154987), 2017, v. 60, n. 3/4, p. 56
- Article
30
- Advocate (05154987), 2015, v. 58, n. 8, p. 21
- Article
31
- International Journal of Cultural Property, 2011, v. 18, n. 2, p. 255, doi. 10.1017/S0940739111000105
- Article
32
- Indiana Law Journal, 2020, v. 95, n. 1, p. 39
- CAHOY, DANIEL R.;
- OSWALD, LYNDA J.
- Article
33
- Indiana Law Journal, 2010, v. 85, n. 1, p. 49
- Article
34
- Journalism & Communication Monographs, 2019, v. 21, n. 3, p. 264, doi. 10.1177/1522637919859598
- Article
35
- Minnesota Law Review, 2014, v. 99, n. 2/3, p. 747
- Article
36
- Law & Contemporary Problems, 2019, v. 82, n. 2, p. 103
- Article
37
- Law & Contemporary Problems, 2019, v. 82, n. 2, p. i
- Article
38
- Judicature, 2013, v. 97, n. 1, p. 22
- Article
39
- Temple Law Review, 2015, v. 87, n. 4, p. 875
- Article
40
- Mercer Law Review, 2012, v. 63, n. 4, p. 1149
- Article
41
- Gonzaga Law Review, 2011, v. 47, n. 1, p. 147
- Article
42
- Canadian Medical Association Journal (CMAJ), 2012, v. 184, n. 14, p. E749
- Article
43
- Syracuse Law Review, 2014, v. 65, n. 1, p. 103
- Article
44
- Albany Law Review, 2014, v. 77, n. 1, p. 13
- Montes, Richard J.;
- Beatty, David A.
- Article
45
- Columbia Journal of Gender & Law, 2013, p. 116
- Article
46
- George Washington Law Review, 2016, v. 84, n. 6, p. 1644
- Article
48
- George Washington Law Review, 2013, v. 81, n. 2, p. 401
- Article
49
- George Washington Law Review, 2012, v. 80, n. 2, p. 505
- Article
50
- Journal of Education, 1914, v. 80, n. 14, p. 378
- Article