Works matching Uber Technologies Inc.
1
- Scientific Papers of Silesian University of Technology. Organization & Management / Zeszyty Naukowe Politechniki Slaskiej. Seria Organizacji i Zarzadzanie, 2018, n. 123, p. 489
- Article
2
- Arbitration International, 2021, v. 37, n. 1, p. 361, doi. 10.1093/arbint/aiaa036
- Article
3
- New York Law School Law Review, 2019, v. 64, n. 3, p. 287
- Article
4
- American Journal of Trial Advocacy, 2016, v. 39, n. 3, p. 609
- Article
5
- Golden Gate University Law Review, 2023, v. 53, n. 1, p. 1
- Article
6
- Journal of Corporation Law, 2016, v. 41, n. 3, p. 727
- Article
7
- Dalhousie Law Journal, 2018, v. 41, n. 2, p. 585
- Article
8
- Industrial Relations / Relations Industrielles, 2019, v. 74, n. 3, p. 577
- Coiquaud, Urwana;
- Martin, Isabelle
- Article
9
- GVcasos: Revista Brasileira de Casos de Ensino em Administração, 2023, v. 13, n. 1, p. 1, doi. 10.12660/gvcasosv13n1c1
- Dias Barbosa, Sophia;
- Russo, Eduardo
- Article
10
- Industrial Relations / Relations Industrielles, 2020, v. 75, n. 3, p. 582, doi. 10.7202/1072349ar
- Coiquaud, Urwana;
- Martin, Isabelle
- Article
11
- Computer und Recht, 2020, v. 36, n. 2, p. r19, doi. 10.9785/cr-2020-360225
- Article
12
- China Business Review, 2015, p. 1
- Article
13
- Tort Trial & Insurance Practice Law Journal, 2016, v. 51, n. 2, p. 289
- Suder, Morgan Paige;
- Weaver, Krystal Norris
- Article
14
- Actualidad Jurídica (1578-956X), 2017, n. 47, p. 301
- Article
15
- ILSA Journal of International & Comparative Law, 2020, v. 26, n. 3, p. 445
- Article
16
- Workforce Solutions Review, 2014, v. 5, n. 5, p. 4
- Article
17
- American Scholar, 2019, v. 88, n. 1, p. 13
- Article
18
- Journal of Health Care Compliance, 2015, v. 17, n. 3, p. 3
- Article
19
- EE: Evaluation Engineering, 2018, v. 57, n. 1, p. 5
- Article
20
- Southern California Law Review, 2016, v. 89, n. 2, p. 317
- Article
21
- Berkeley Technology Law Journal, 2016, v. 31, p. 1023, doi. 10.15779/Z38JR9M
- Article
22
- Freeman: Ideas on Liberty, 2015, p. 44
- Article
23
- Freeman: Ideas on Liberty, 2014, v. 64, n. 9, p. 36
- Article
24
- Freeman: Ideas on Liberty, 2014, v. 64, p. 36
- Article
26
- Washington Law Review, 2015, v. 90, n. 3, p. 1431
- Article
27
- Ohio State Law Journal, 2017, v. 78, n. 1, p. 20
- Article
28
- Computer Law Review International, 2019, v. 20, n. 1, p. 15, doi. 10.9785/cri-2019-200104
- Article
30
- Computer Law Review International, 2016, v. 17, n. 6, p. 161, doi. 10.9785/cri-2016-0602
- Article
31
- Computer Law Review International, 2016, v. 17, n. 4, p. 126, doi. 10.9785/cri-2016-0406
- Article
32
- University of San Francisco Law Review, 2017, v. 51, n. 1, p. 51
- Article
33
- Georgia State University Law Review, 2017, v. 33, n. 2, p. 517
- Article
34
- Delhi Business Review, 2023, v. 24, n. 2, p. 93, doi. 10.51768/dbr.v24i2.242202308
- Bartz, Will;
- Ondracek, James;
- Saeed, Mohammad;
- Bertsch, Andy
- Article
35
- Business Lawyer, 2020, v. 76, n. 1, p. 349
- Article
36
- Business Lawyer, 2018, v. 74, n. 1, p. 229
- Article
37
- Business Lawyer, 2017, v. 73, n. 1, p. 267
- Article
38
- Wake Forest Law Review, 2016, v. 51, n. 5, p. 1223
- Article
39
- University of Miami Business Law Review, 2020, v. 28, n. 2, p. 382
- Article
40
- Quality Progress, 2016, v. 49, n. 11, p. 12
- Article
41
- Advocate (05154987), 2019, v. 62, n. 3/4, p. 30
- Article
42
- Golden Gate University Law Review, 2017, v. 47, n. 2, p. 153
- Article
43
- Human Ecology, 2016, v. 44, n. 2, p. 33
- Article
46
- Braille Monitor, 2016, v. 59, n. 8, p. 645
- Article
47
- Alberta Law Review, 2022, v. 59, n. 4, p. 871, doi. 10.29173/alr2700
- Article
48
- CPA Journal, 2023, v. 93, n. 1/2, p. 68
- Rosenthal, Corey L.;
- Rothenberg, Lance E.
- Article
49
- Critical Discourse Studies, 2020, v. 17, n. 4, p. 394, doi. 10.1080/17405904.2019.1607762
- Mishra, Smeeta;
- Bathini, Dharma Raju
- Article
50
- Risk Governance & Control: Financial Markets & Institutions, 2022, v. 12, n. 3, p. 34, doi. 10.22495/rgcv12i3p3
- Article