Works matching USA Freedom Act
2
- Harvard National Security Journal, 2020, v. 11, n. 3, p. 308
- Landau, Susan;
- Lubin, Asaf
- Article
3
- Harvard National Security Journal, 2020, v. 11, n. 3, p. 308
- Landau, Susan;
- Lubin, Asaf
- Article
4
- Washington & Lee Law Review, 2015, v. 72, n. 3, p. 1307
- Article
5
- Asia-Pacific Journal: Japan Focus, 2018, v. 16, n. 13, p. 1
- Article
6
- Columbia Journal of Gender & Law, 2015, v. 29, n. 1, p. 104
- Article
9
- Banking Law Journal, 2012, v. 129, n. 4, p. 374
- Article
10
- Southwestern Law Review, 2016, v. 45, n. 2, p. 351
- Article
11
- Global Media Journal: Indian Edition, 2010, p. 80
- Article
12
- Harvard Law & Policy Review, 2015, v. 9, n. 1, p. 63
- Article
14
- Washburn Law Journal, 2018, v. 57, n. 2, p. 397
- Article
15
- Temple Law Review, 2013, v. 85, n. 2, p. 367
- Article
16
- Cardozo Law Review, 2018, v. 39, n. 3, p. 1055
- Article
17
- Ohio State Law Journal, 2024, v. 85, n. 1, p. 81
- Article
18
- 2012
- Hirabayashi, Lane Ryo;
- Alquizola, Marilyn C.
- Essay
19
- Journal of Church & State, 2018, v. 60, n. 1, p. 43, doi. 10.1093/jcs/csw101
- Jelen, Ted G.;
- Lewis, Andrew R.;
- Djupe, Paul A.
- Article
20
- California Law Review, 2021, v. 109, n. 6, p. 2423, doi. 10.15779/Z384B2X56N
- Article
21
- Oklahoma City University Law Review, 2014, v. 39, p. 465
- Article
22
- Harvard Journal of Law & Public Policy, 2018, v. 41, n. 1, p. 79
- Article
23
- Harvard Journal of Law & Public Policy, 2015, v. 38, n. 1, p. 437
- Article
24
- Legislation & Policy Brief, 2013, v. 5, n. 1, p. 103
- Article
25
- Constitutional Commentary, 2015, v. 30, n. 2, p. 403
- Article
26
- Constitutional Commentary, 2015, v. 30, n. 2, p. 277
- Article
27
- University of Illinois Law Review, 2014, v. 2014, n. 5, p. 1521
- Nagy, Donna M.;
- Painter, Richard W.
- Article
28
- Public Contract Law Journal, 2010, v. 39, n. 3, p. 617
- Article
29
- Minnesota Law Review, 2014, v. 99, n. 1, p. 27
- Article
30
- William & Mary Law Review, 2012, v. 53, n. 3, p. 1087
- Article
31
- Journal of Law & Health, 2015, v. 28, n. 1, p. 61
- Article
32
- Field Methods, 2001, v. 13, n. 4, p. 370, doi. 10.1177/1525822X0101300404
- Article
33
- In the Library with the Lead Pipe, 2013, p. 1
- Article
34
- Boston University Law Review, 2017, v. 97, n. 5, p. 1893
- Article
35
- Boston University Law Review, 2015, v. 95, n. 4, p. 1425
- Article
36
- Boston University Law Review, 2015, v. 95, n. 3, p. 951
- Article
37
- Governance, 2017, v. 30, n. 2, p. 173, doi. 10.1111/gove.12272
- Article
38
- Governance, 2016, v. 29, n. 3, p. 299, doi. 10.1111/gove.12203
- Article
39
- University of Cincinnati Law Review, 2016, v. 84, n. 2, p. 575
- Article
40
- Southern California Interdisciplinary Law Journal, 2016, v. 25, n. 1, p. 229
- Article
41
- Alabama Law Review, 2015, v. 66, n. 4, p. 925
- Article
42
- Journal of Tax Practice & Procedure, 2013, v. 15, n. 4, p. 35
- Agostino, Frank;
- Krieger, Tara
- Article
43
- Journal of National Security Law & Policy, 2014, v. 7, n. 3, p. 443
- Article
44
- Southern Illinois University Law Journal, 2015, v. 39, n. 2, p. 323
- Article
45
- Contract Management, 2015, v. 55, n. 8, p. 48
- Ganderson, Justin M.;
- Barnett, Kevin T.
- Article
46
- Brooklyn Law Review, 2014, v. 80, n. 1, p. 285
- Article
47
- Journal of Corporation Law, 2016, v. 41, n. 4, p. 971
- Article
48
- Notre Dame Journal of Law, Ethics & Public Policy, 2017, v. 31, n. 2, p. 409
- Article
50
- Southern Law Journal, 2016, v. 26, n. 2, p. 233
- CASPER, W. CAMRON;
- SCHOEN, EDWARD J.
- Article