Works matching USA Freedom Act
2
- Harvard National Security Journal, 2020, v. 11, n. 3, p. 308
- Landau, Susan;
- Lubin, Asaf
- Article
3
- Harvard National Security Journal, 2020, v. 11, n. 3, p. 308
- Landau, Susan;
- Lubin, Asaf
- Article
4
- Washington & Lee Law Review, 2015, v. 72, n. 3, p. 1307
- Article
5
- Asia-Pacific Journal: Japan Focus, 2018, v. 16, n. 13, p. 1
- Article
6
- Journal of Law & Health, 2015, v. 28, n. 1, p. 61
- Article
7
- Journal of Corporation Law, 2016, v. 41, n. 4, p. 971
- Article
8
- Field Methods, 2001, v. 13, n. 4, p. 370, doi. 10.1177/1525822X0101300404
- Article
9
- California Law Review, 2021, v. 109, n. 6, p. 2423, doi. 10.15779/Z384B2X56N
- Article
10
- Southern Law Journal, 2016, v. 26, n. 2, p. 233
- CASPER, W. CAMRON;
- SCHOEN, EDWARD J.
- Article
11
- Touro Law Review, 2014, v. 30, n. 4, p. 975
- Article
12
- Touro Law Review, 2014, v. 30, n. 1, p. 9
- Article
13
- Public Contract Law Journal, 2010, v. 39, n. 3, p. 617
- Article
14
- Forum (2194-6183), 2019, v. 17, n. 1, p. 45, doi. 10.1515/for-2019-0007
- Article
16
- International Journal of Public Administration, 2016, v. 39, n. 6, p. 492, doi. 10.1080/01900692.2015.1018426
- Article
17
- Harvard Journal of Law & Public Policy, 2018, v. 41, n. 1, p. 79
- Article
18
- Harvard Journal of Law & Public Policy, 2015, v. 38, n. 1, p. 437
- Article
19
- Construction Lawyer, 2012, v. 32, n. 3, p. 29
- Article
20
- Construction Lawyer, 2011, v. 31, n. 1, p. 17
- Toormey, Daniel E.;
- Ferretti, Joseph S.
- Article
21
- Construction Lawyer, 2011, v. 31, n. 1, p. 3
- Article
22
- Banking Law Journal, 2012, v. 129, n. 4, p. 374
- Article
23
- University of Illinois Law Review, 2014, v. 2014, n. 5, p. 1521
- Nagy, Donna M.;
- Painter, Richard W.
- Article
24
- George Mason Law Review, 2013, v. 21, n. 1, p. 1
- Article
25
- American University Journal of Gender, Social Policy & the Law, 2015, v. 23, n. 3, p. 435
- LUNSFORD, JENNIFER;
- SANZONE, R. ZACHARY
- Article
26
- Southern Illinois University Law Journal, 2015, v. 39, n. 2, p. 323
- Article
27
- William & Mary Law Review, 2012, v. 53, n. 3, p. 1087
- Article
28
- Notre Dame Journal of Law, Ethics & Public Policy, 2017, v. 31, n. 2, p. 409
- Article
29
- Harvard Law & Policy Review, 2015, v. 9, n. 1, p. 63
- Article
31
- University of Cincinnati Law Review, 2016, v. 84, n. 2, p. 575
- Article
32
- Cardozo Law Review, 2018, v. 39, n. 3, p. 1055
- Article
33
- Alabama Law Review, 2015, v. 66, n. 4, p. 925
- Article
34
- Cornell Law Review, 2014, v. 99, n. 3, p. 633
- Article
35
- Tennessee Law Review, 2015, v. 82, n. 2, p. 345
- Article
36
- Minnesota Law Review, 2014, v. 99, n. 1, p. 27
- Article
37
- Indiana Law Review, 2015, v. 49, n. 1, p. 241, doi. 10.18060/4806.0067
- Article
38
- Indiana Law Review, 2015, v. 48, n. 2, p. 461, doi. 10.18060/4806.0003
- Article
39
- SMU Law Review, 2015, v. 68, n. 1, p. 307
- Article
40
- South Carolina Law Review, 2013, v. 65, n. 1, p. 1
- Article
41
- Journal of Law & Education, 2017, v. 46, n. 1, p. 145
- Article
42
- Cardozo Arts & Entertainment Law Journal, 2013, v. 32, n. 1, p. 347
- Article
43
- Brooklyn Law Review, 2014, v. 80, n. 1, p. 285
- Article
44
- Boston University Law Review, 2017, v. 97, n. 5, p. 1893
- Article
45
- Boston University Law Review, 2015, v. 95, n. 4, p. 1425
- Article
46
- Boston University Law Review, 2015, v. 95, n. 3, p. 951
- Article
47
- Temple Law Review, 2013, v. 85, n. 2, p. 367
- Article
48
- Ohio State Law Journal, 2024, v. 85, n. 1, p. 81
- Article
49
- Social Research, 2010, v. 77, n. 3, p. 805
- Article