Works matching Trial by jury and the Supreme Court
1
- Demokratizatsiya, 2006, v. 14, n. 1, p. 42, doi. 10.3200/DEMO.14.1.42-58
- Article
2
- Journal of Southern Legal History, 2019, v. 27, p. 1
- Article
3
- Washburn Law Journal, 2013, v. 53, n. 1, p. 147
- Article
5
- Journal of Australian Studies, 2020, v. 44, n. 3, p. 334, doi. 10.1080/14443058.2020.1790630
- Article
6
- Mercer Law Review, 2023, v. 74, n. 2, p. 751
- Article
7
- Tennessee Bar Journal, 2020, v. 56, n. 6, p. 12
- Article
8
- Rutgers Law Journal, 2011, v. 42, n. 4, p. 1023
- Article
9
- Utah Law Review, 2009, v. 2009, n. 1, p. 219
- Article
10
- Yale Law Journal, 2013, v. 123, n. 1, p. 208
- Article
11
- Denver Law Review, 2017, v. 94, n. 2, p. 385
- Article
12
- Denver Law Review, 2017, v. 94, n. 2, p. 385
- Article
13
- California Law Review, 2012, v. 100, n. 1, p. 183
- Article
14
- Iowa Law Review, 2014, v. 99, n. 2, p. 919
- Article
15
- Tennessee Bar Journal, 2006, v. 42, n. 11, p. 6
- Article
16
- Widener Commonwealth Law Review, 2025, v. 34, n. 1, p. 71
- Article
17
- University of Pennsylvania Journal of Constitutional Law, 2022, v. 24, n. 4, p. 817
- Article
18
- Journal of Criminal Law, Criminology & Police Science, 1971, v. 62, n. 4, p. 497, doi. 10.2307/1141701
- Article
19
- Oregon Law Review, 2018, v. 96, n. 2, p. 725
- Article
20
- Oregon Law Review, 2018, v. 96, n. 2, p. 691
- Article
21
- Oregon Law Review, 2018, v. 96, n. 2, p. 707
- Article
22
- Oregon Law Review, 2018, v. 96, n. 2, p. 673
- Article
23
- Oregon Law Review, 2018, v. 96, n. 2, p. 489
- PECK, ROBERT S.;
- CHEMERINSKY, ERWIN
- Article
24
- Oregon Law Review, 2018, v. 96, n. 2, p. 561
- Article
25
- Oregon Law Review, 2018, v. 96, n. 2, p. 585
- Article
26
- Oregon Law Review, 2018, v. 96, n. 2, p. 599
- Article
27
- Oregon Law Review, 2018, v. 96, n. 2, p. 621
- Article
28
- Oregon Law Review, 2018, v. 96, n. 2, p. 479
- Article
29
- Oregon Law Review, 2018, v. 96, n. 2, p. 677
- Article
30
- University of Miami Law Review, 2022, v. 76, n. 3, p. 825
- Article
31
- Maryland Law Review, 2014, v. 73, n. 3, p. 837
- Article
32
- California Law Review, 1974, v. 62, n. 2, p. 536
- Article
33
- Arbitration Journal, 1987, v. 42, n. 3, p. 68
- Article
34
- Emory Law Journal, 2019, v. 69, n. 2, p. 273
- Thomas, Suja A.;
- Stich, Collin
- Article
35
- New York University Annual Survey of American Law, 2015, v. 71, n. 2, p. 147
- MARTENS, MATTHEW T.;
- PAREDES, TROY A.
- Article
36
- New Mexico Law Review, 2018, v. 48, n. 3, p. 522
- Article
37
- Missouri Law Review, 2017, v. 82, n. 4, p. 1195
- Article
38
- Missouri Law Review, 2015, v. 80, n. 3, p. 809
- Article
39
- Missouri Law Review, 2013, v. 78, n. 3, p. 1015
- Article
40
- Cardozo Law Review, 2013, v. 35, n. 1, p. 1
- Finneran, Richard E.;
- Luther, Steven K.
- Article
41
- American Bar Association Journal, 1979, v. 65, n. 1, p. 120
- Article
42
- American Bar Association Journal, 1978, v. 64, n. 11, p. 1656
- Article
43
- Forensic Examiner, 2003, v. 12, n. 3/4, p. 26
- Article
44
- Law & Contemporary Problems, 1980, v. 43, n. 4, p. 8, doi. 10.2307/1191376
- Article
45
- Revista Vasca de Derecho Procesal y Arbitraje, 2022, v. 34, n. 3, p. 123
- Ruiz Giraldo, Rocío;
- Ruiz Yamuza, Florentino Gregorio
- Article
46
- Denver Law Review, 2019, v. 97, n. 1, p. 117
- Article
47
- California Law Review, 2011, v. 99, n. 4, p. 1117
- Article
48
- Behavioral Sciences & the Law, 1984, v. 2, n. 4, p. 423, doi. 10.1002/bsl.2370020409
- Deitz, Sheila R.;
- Sissman, Peter L.
- Article
49
- American Sociological Review, 1950, v. 15, n. 1, p. 73, doi. 10.2307/2086402
- Article
50
- Journal of Social Forces, 1925, v. 3, n. 2, p. 335, doi. 10.1093/sf/3.2.335
- Article