Works matching Textualism (Legal interpretation)
1
- Statute Law Review, 2024, v. 45, n. 1, p. 1, doi. 10.1093/slr/hmae006
- Serediuk, Vitalii;
- Shutak, Illya;
- Onyshchuk, Ihor
- Article
3
- Yale Journal of Law & the Humanities, 2013, v. 25, n. 1, p. 43
- Article
4
- Harvard Journal of Law & Public Policy, 2019, v. 42, n. 2, p. 649
- Article
5
- Harvard Journal of Law & Public Policy, 2015, v. 38, n. 2, p. 711
- Article
6
- University of Chicago Law Review, 2015, v. 82, n. 3, p. 1235
- Article
7
- University of Colorado Law Review, 2017, v. 88, n. 1, p. 1
- Article
8
- University of Colorado Law Review, 2017, v. 88, n. 1, p. 1
- Article
9
- Harvard Journal of Law & Public Policy, 2023, v. 46, n. 3, p. 1331
- Article
10
- William & Mary Law Review, 2025, v. 66, n. 6, p. 1389
- Article
11
- William & Mary Law Review, 2024, v. 65, n. 5, p. 1005
- Article
12
- Knowledge: International Journal, 2024, v. 65, n. 6, p. 1089
- Article
13
- George Washington Law Review, 2022, v. 90, n. 6, p. 1458
- Article
14
- George Washington Law Review, 2022, v. 90, n. 5, p. 1053
- Article
15
- George Washington Law Review, 2022, v. 90, n. 4, p. 825
- Article
16
- George Washington Law Review, 2014, v. 82, n. 3, p. 718
- Article
17
- George Washington Law Review, 2012, v. 80, n. 6, p. 1753
- Article
18
- George Washington Law Review, 2012, v. 80, n. 6, p. 1683
- Article
19
- George Washington Law Review, 2012, v. 80, n. 6, p. 1610
- Scalia, Antonin;
- Manning, John F.
- Article
20
- Melilah: Journal of Jewish Studies, 2015, v. 12, p. 84
- Article
21
- Narrative, 2021, v. 29, n. 2, p. 178, doi. 10.1353/nar.2021.0010
- Article
22
- Právník, 2024, v. 163, n. 9, p. 986
- Article
23
- Michigan Journal of Environmental & Administrative Law, 2012, v. 1, n. 1, p. 287, doi. 10.36640/mjeal.1.1.text
- Article
24
- University of New Hampshire Law Review, 2023, v. 21, n. 2, p. 261
- Article
25
- Análisis Filosófico, 2010, v. 30, n. 2, p. 187, doi. 10.36446/af.2010.129
- Article
26
- Alberta Law Review, 2024, v. 61, n. 3, p. 671
- Article
27
- Alberta Law Review, 2022, v. 60, n. 1, p. 35, doi. 10.29173/alr2710
- Article
28
- Alabama Law Review, 2024, v. 76, n. 2, p. 223
- McGinnis, John O.;
- Rappaport, Michael B.
- Article
29
- Alabama Law Review, 2023, v. 74, n. 4, p. 1090
- Article
30
- Alabama Law Review, 2023, v. 74, n. 4, p. 1090
- Article
31
- Alabama Law Review, 2019, v. 70, n. 3, p. 757
- Article
32
- Alabama Law Review, 2019, v. 70, n. 3, p. 687
- Article
33
- Alabama Law Review, 2019, v. 70, n. 3, p. 667
- Article
34
- Journal of Contemporary Legal Issues, 2021, v. 23, n. 1, p. 169
- Article
35
- Texas Review of Law & Politics, 2023, v. 28, n. 1, p. 125
- Article
36
- U.C. Davis Law Review, 2016, v. 49, n. 3, p. 1097
- Article
37
- Nevada Law Journal, 2019, v. 19, n. 3, p. 741
- Article
38
- Monash University Law Review, 2017, v. 43, n. 1, p. 238
- Article
39
- Missouri Law Review, 2022, v. 87, n. 1, p. 1
- Newcombe, Caroline Bermeo
- Article
40
- Florida State University Law Review, 2011, v. 38, n. 3, p. 679
- Article
41
- Victoria University of Wellington Law Review, 2012, v. 43, n. 2, p. 263, doi. 10.26686/vuwlr.v43i2.5034
- Article
42
- Victoria University of Wellington Law Review, 2012, v. 43, n. 2, p. 263
- Article
43
- Texas Law Review, 2025, v. 103, n. 4, p. 785
- Lande, Robert H.;
- Newman, John M.;
- Slaughter, Rebecca Kelly
- Article
44
- Texas Law Review, 2024, v. 102, n. 4, p. 639
- Article
45
- Texas Law Review, 2013, v. 91, n. 3, p. 479
- Article
46
- South Carolina Law Review, 2012, v. 64, n. 2, p. 221
- Gifford, Donald G.;
- Reynolds, William L.;
- Murad, Andrew M.
- Article
47
- Wisconsin Law Review, 2022, v. 2022, n. 5, p. 1275
- Article
48
- Wisconsin Law Review, 2022, v. 2022, n. 5, p. 1235
- LITMAN, LEAH M.;
- SHAW, KATHERINE
- Article
49
- Wisconsin Law Review, 2022, v. 2022, n. 5, p. 1109
- Article
50
- Wisconsin Law Review, 2022, v. 2022, n. 5, p. 1139
- Article