Works matching Takings clause (Constitutional law)
1
- Temple Law Review, 2013, v. 86, n. 1, p. 181
- Article
2
- California Law Review, 2013, v. 101, n. 2, p. 277
- Article
3
- Yale Law Journal, 2013, v. 122, n. 7, p. 1738
- Article
4
- University of Chicago Law Review, 2019, v. 86, n. 4, p. 945
- Article
5
- University of Chicago Law Review, 2019, v. 86, n. 1, p. 77
- Article
6
- University of Chicago Law Review, 2017, v. 84, n. 3, p. 1379
- Article
7
- University of Miami Law Review, 2018, v. 73, n. 1, p. 139
- Article
8
- Actualidad Jurídica (1578-956X), 2008, n. 19, p. 79
- PEINADO, JUAN ANTONIO CHINCHILLA
- Article
9
- New York University Law Review, 2020, v. 95, n. 6, p. 1904
- Article
10
- Natural Resources Journal, 1996, v. 36, n. 1, p. 87
- Article
11
- Natural Resources Journal, 1996, v. 36, n. 1, p. 59
- Article
12
- Land Economics, 1970, v. 46, n. 3, p. 314, doi. 10.2307/3145386
- Article
13
- Urban Lawyer, 2017, v. 49, n. 4, p. 607
- Article
14
- Urban Lawyer, 2015, v. 47, n. 3, p. 501
- Article
15
- Urban Lawyer, 2014, v. 46, n. 3, p. 710
- Article
16
- Urban Lawyer, 2014, v. 46, n. 3, p. 703
- Article
17
- Urban Lawyer, 2014, v. 46, n. 3, p. 655
- Article
18
- Urban Lawyer, 2014, v. 46, n. 1, p. 139
- Article
19
- Urban Lawyer, 2013, v. 45, n. 3, p. 571
- Article
20
- Urban Lawyer, 2013, v. 45, n. 3, p. 809
- Murakami, Mark M.;
- Ace, Bethany C. K.;
- Thomas, Robert H.
- Article
21
- Urban Lawyer, 2013, v. 45, n. 3, p. 769
- Article
22
- Urban Lawyer, 2013, v. 45, n. 2, p. 509
- Article
24
- Urban Lawyer, 2006, v. 38, n. 4, p. 1223
- Article
25
- California Law Review, 1986, v. 74, n. 4, p. 1329, doi. 10.2307/3480364
- Article
26
- Columbia Law Review, 2017, v. 117, n. 8, p. 2043
- Bell, Abraham;
- Parchomovsky, Gideon
- Article
27
- Columbia Law Review, 2016, v. 116, n. 8, p. xviii
- Article
28
- Columbia Law Review, 2014, v. 114, n. 6, p. 1297
- Article
29
- Columbia Law Review, 2013, v. 113, n. 3, p. 593
- Article
30
- Business & Society Review (00453609), 2008, v. 113, n. 1, p. 91, doi. 10.1111/j.1467-8594.2008.00314.x
- Article
31
- International Journal of Business & Public Administration, 2015, v. 12, n. 2, p. 25
- Article
32
- Duke Journal of Constitutional Law & Public Policy, 2011, v. 6, p. 91
- Article
33
- Duke Journal of Constitutional Law & Public Policy, 2011, v. 6, p. 75
- Article
34
- Duke Journal of Constitutional Law & Public Policy, 2011, v. 6, p. 37
- Article
35
- Duke Journal of Constitutional Law & Public Policy, 2011, v. 6, p. i
- Article
36
- Law, Culture & the Humanities, 2015, v. 11, n. 3, p. 393, doi. 10.1177/1743872112439147
- Skinner, Daniel;
- Feldman, Leonard
- Article
37
- Cato Supreme Court Review, 2018, p. 153
- Article
38
- Cato Supreme Court Review, 2016, p. 131
- Article
39
- Cato Supreme Court Review, 2012, p. 215
- Article
40
- Cato Supreme Court Review, 2012, p. 245
- Article
41
- Business Law Review (15337421), 2014, v. 47, p. 115
- Simansky, Jon;
- Hunter Jr., Richard J.
- Article
42
- Journal of Contemporary Criminal Justice, 2003, v. 19, n. 2, p. 205, doi. 10.1177/1043986203251618
- Article
43
- Widener Law Review, 2017, v. 23, n. 1, p. 37
- HOLLOWAY, JAMES E.;
- GUY, DONALD C.
- Article
44
- Washington University Journal of Law & Policy, 2017, v. 53, p. 189
- Article
45
- Washington University Journal of Law & Policy, 2017, v. 53, p. 189
- Article
46
- Temple Law Review, 2020, v. 92, n. 3, p. 595
- Article
47
- Missouri Law Review, 2023, v. 88, n. 1, p. 181
- Article
48
- Missouri Law Review, 2014, v. 79, n. 3, p. 715
- Article
49
- Mississippi College Law Review, 2021, v. 39, n. 1, p. 124
- Article
50
- Mississippi College Law Review, 2020, v. 38, n. 2, p. 146
- Article