Works matching Supreme Court and contract law
1
- Construction Lawyer, 2021, v. 41, n. 3, p. 5
- Article
2
- Construction Lawyer, 2021, v. 41, n. 2, p. 6
- Article
3
- Defense Counsel Journal, 2011, v. 78, n. 1, p. 116
- Jones, Abbott Marie;
- Berdy, Christopher
- Article
4
- Construction Law International, 2015, v. 10, n. 1, p. 4
- Article
5
- Arizona Law Review, 2018, v. 60, n. 2, p. 425
- Article
6
- Maritime Law Review / Revista de Drept Maritim, 2014, n. 2, p. 82
- Article
7
- European Review of Contract Law, 2024, v. 20, n. 2, p. 155, doi. 10.1515/ercl-2024-2007
- Article
8
- Journal of Corporate Law Studies, 2010, v. 10, n. 2, p. 485, doi. 10.5235/147359710793129426
- Article
9
- Global Jurist, 2019, v. 19, n. 2, p. N.PAG, doi. 10.1515/gj-2019-0013
- Article
10
- Duke Law Journal, 2012, v. 61, n. 7, p. 1511
- Richman, Barak;
- Schmelzer, Dennis
- Article
11
- Georgia State University Law Review, 2022, v. 38, n. 2, p. 403
- Article
12
- Boston College International & Comparative Law Review, 2013, v. 36, n. 2, p. 1237
- Article
13
- UCLA Law Review, 2020, v. 67, n. 5, p. 1130
- Article
14
- UCLA Law Review, 2020, v. 67, n. 5, p. 1204
- Article
15
- Alberta Law Review, 2022, v. 59, n. 4, p. 871, doi. 10.29173/alr2700
- Article
16
- Emory Bankruptcy Developments Journal, 2015, v. 32, n. 1, p. 87
- Article
17
- Chinese Journal of Comparative Law, 2020, v. 8, n. 2, p. 485, doi. 10.1093/cjcl/cxaa023
- Article
18
- Revista de Derecho Privado (0123-4366), 2014, n. 26, p. 105
- PADILLA, JORGE;
- RUEDA, NATALIA;
- SIERRA, MÁLORY ZAFRA
- Article
19
- Kansas Law Review, 2024, v. 73, n. 1, p. 113
- Article
20
- New York University Annual Survey of American Law, 2021, v. 76, n. 3, p. 779
- Article
21
- Victoria University of Wellington Law Review, 2019, v. 50, n. 4, p. 657, doi. 10.26686/vuwlr.v50i4.6306
- Article
22
- North Dakota Law Review, 2011, v. 87, n. 4, p. 743
- Article
23
- University of Pennsylvania Law Review, 2023, v. 171, n. 3, p. 617
- Article
24
- American University Business Law Review, 2024, v. 14, n. 1, p. 501
- Article
25
- Revista E-mercatoria, 2019, v. 18, n. 1, p. 63
- Article
26
- Boston University International Law Journal, 2016, v. 34, n. 1, p. 181
- Article
27
- Jurisprudence / Jurisprudencija, 2011, v. 18, n. 3, p. 979
- Article
28
- Modern Law Review, 1979, v. 42, n. 2, p. 229, doi. 10.1111/j.1468-2230.1979.tb01532.x
- Article
29
- Boston University Law Review, 2019, v. 99, n. 3, p. 873
- Article
30
- Yale Law Journal, 2011, v. 120, n. 8, p. 1898
- Article
31
- Boston College Law Review, 2013, v. 54, n. 3, p. 1237
- Article
32
- Marquette Law Review, 2015, v. 98, n. 4, p. 1729
- Article
34
- Taiwan Law Review, 2024, n. 345, p. 6, doi. 10.53106/1025593134501
- Article
35
- Appeal: Review of Current Law & Law Reform, 2022, v. 27, p. 103
- Article
36
- Financial Analysis / Mali Cozum Dergisi, 2014, v. 24, n. 125, p. 125
- Article
37
- Industrial Law Journal, 2022, v. 51, n. 3, p. 626, doi. 10.1093/indlaw/dwab017
- Article
38
- Denver Law Review, 2016, v. 93, n. 4, p. 899
- Article
39
- Dalhousie Law Journal, 2022, v. 45, n. 1, p. 35
- Article
40
- Cleveland State Law Review, 2016, v. 64, n. 4, p. 1027
- Article
41
- Cleveland State Law Review, 2016, v. 64, n. 1, p. 37
- Article