Works matching Supreme Court and constitutional interpretation
1
- German Law Journal, 2013, v. 14, n. 8, p. 1337, doi. 10.1017/s2071832200002285
- Article
2
- Arizona State Law Journal, 2019, v. 51, n. 1, p. 109
- Article
3
- Chapman Law Review, 2021, v. 25, n. 1, p. 171
- Article
5
- Stanford Journal of International Law, 2019, v. 55, n. 1, p. 27
- Article
6
- Transnational Legal Theory, 2013, v. 4, n. 2, p. 227, doi. 10.5235/20414005.4.2.227
- de la Rasilla del Moral, Ignacio
- Article
7
- German Law Journal, 2013, v. 14, n. 8, p. 1297, doi. 10.1017/s2071832200002273
- Article
8
- Iowa Law Review, 2007, v. 92, n. 3, p. 1037
- Article
9
- Stanford Journal of Civil Rights & Civil Liberties, 2012, v. 8, n. 1, p. 1
- Article
10
- Revista Española de Derecho Constitucional, 2024, n. 132, p. 45, doi. 10.18042/cepc/redc.132.02
- Article
11
- Iowa Law Review, 2017, v. 102, n. 5, p. 2265
- Article
12
- Argumenta: Journal Law / Revista Jurídica, 2013, p. 283
- CASSEB, Henrique Morgado;
- AUGUSTO, Ilnah Toledo
- Article
13
- Queen's Law Journal, 2021, v. 47, n. 1, p. 78
- Article
14
- University of Pennsylvania Law Review, 2025, v. 173, n. 7, p. 1935, doi. 10.58112/uplr.173-7.3
- Article
15
- Yale Law Journal, 2011, v. 120, n. 8, p. 1898
- Article
16
- University of Chicago Law Review, 2017, v. 84, p. 2265
- Article
17
- Natural Resources Journal, 2019, v. 59, n. 1, p. 59
- Regalia, Joseph;
- Hall, Noah D.
- Article
18
- Maryland Law Review, 2017, v. 76, n. 2, p. 309
- BOLDT, RICHARD;
- FRIEDMAN, DAN
- Article
19
- Revista de Derecho Politico, 2020, n. 109, p. 193
- Article
20
- Revista de Derecho Politico, 2011, v. 80, p. 39
- LÓPEZ, FERNANDO SANTAOLALLA
- Article
21
- Journal of Human Rights, 2016, v. 15, n. 4, p. 477, doi. 10.1080/14754835.2015.1103163
- Article
22
- California Law Review, 1999, v. 87, n. 5, p. 1105, doi. 10.2307/3481039
- Article
23
- Brookings Review, 2000, v. 18, n. 1, p. 24
- Article
24
- Refugee Survey Quarterly, 2010, v. 29, n. 4, p. 31, doi. 10.1093/rsq/hdq039
- Article
25
- Cato Supreme Court Review, 2008, p. 161
- Article
26
- Sustainable Development Law & Policy, 2019, v. 20, n. 1, p. 15
- Article
27
- Missouri Law Review, 2020, v. 85, n. 4, p. 1229
- Article
28
- Cardozo Law Review, 2024, v. 45, n. 6, p. 1653
- Article
29
- Law & Society Review, 1988, v. 21, n. 5, p. 777, doi. 10.1017/s0023921600028048
- Article
30
- Law & Contemporary Problems, 2000, v. 63, n. 1/2, p. 61
- Article
31
- Law & Contemporary Problems, 1993, v. 56, n. 4, p. 121, doi. 10.2307/1192093
- Article
32
- Law & Contemporary Problems, 1990, v. 53, n. 1/2, p. 135, doi. 10.2307/1191832
- Article
33
- George Washington Law Review, 2012, v. 80, n. 6, p. 1794
- Article
34
- Denver Law Review, 2023, v. 100, n. 3, p. 679
- Article
36
- Espaço Jurídico: Journal of Law, 2018, v. 19, n. 1, p. 25, doi. 10.18593/ejjl.v19i1.14457
- Lazzarotto Simioni, Rafael
- Article
38
- Yale Journal of Law & the Humanities, 2013, v. 25, n. 1, p. 43
- Article
39
- Pace Law Review, 2024, v. 44, n. 2, p. 375, doi. 10.58948/2331-3528.2090
- Article
40
- Duquesne Law Review, 2014, v. 52, n. 1, p. 25
- Article
42
- North Dakota Law Review, 2020, v. 95, n. 3, p. 417
- Article
43
- Public Administration Review, 1987, v. 47, n. 1, p. 93, doi. 10.2307/975476
- Kraemer, Kenneth L.;
- King, John Leslie
- Article
44
- Public Administration Review, 1985, v. 45, n. 6, p. 845, doi. 10.2307/975360
- Article
45
- Harvard Journal of Law & Public Policy, 2019, v. 42, n. 2, p. 649
- Article
47
- Harvard Journal of Law & Public Policy, 2015, v. 38, n. 3, p. 889
- Article
50
- Harvard Journal of Law & Public Policy, 2014, v. 37, n. 3, p. 1123
- Article