Works matching Supreme Court and constitutional interpretation
1
- German Law Journal, 2013, v. 14, n. 8, p. 1337, doi. 10.1017/s2071832200002285
- Article
2
- Chapman Law Review, 2021, v. 25, n. 1, p. 171
- Article
3
- Stanford Journal of International Law, 2019, v. 55, n. 1, p. 27
- Article
5
- Arizona State Law Journal, 2019, v. 51, n. 1, p. 109
- Article
6
- German Law Journal, 2013, v. 14, n. 8, p. 1297, doi. 10.1017/s2071832200002273
- Article
7
- Revista Española de Derecho Constitucional, 2024, n. 132, p. 45, doi. 10.18042/cepc/redc.132.02
- Article
8
- Stanford Journal of Civil Rights & Civil Liberties, 2012, v. 8, n. 1, p. 1
- Article
9
- Iowa Law Review, 2007, v. 92, n. 3, p. 1037
- Article
10
- Transnational Legal Theory, 2013, v. 4, n. 2, p. 227, doi. 10.5235/20414005.4.2.227
- de la Rasilla del Moral, Ignacio
- Article
11
- Argumenta: Journal Law / Revista Jurídica, 2013, p. 283
- CASSEB, Henrique Morgado;
- AUGUSTO, Ilnah Toledo
- Article
12
- Queen's Law Journal, 2021, v. 47, n. 1, p. 78
- Article
13
- Iowa Law Review, 2017, v. 102, n. 5, p. 2265
- Article
14
- Journal of Anbar University for Law & Political Sciences, 2025, v. 15, n. 1, Part 1, p. 183, doi. 10.37651/aujlps.2024.154764.1380
- حلا جاسم كاظم;
- دق عادل طالب
- Article
15
- Boston University Law Review, 2025, v. 105, n. 2, p. 371
- Article
16
- Indiana Law Journal, 2020, v. 96, n. 1, p. 337
- Article
17
- International Journal of Public Administration, 1997, v. 20, n. 4/5, p. 887, doi. 10.1080/01900699708525223
- Article
18
- International Journal of Public Administration, 1979, v. 1, n. 1, p. 115
- Article
19
- Boston University Law Review, 2018, v. 98, n. 2, p. 541
- Article
20
- Boston University Law Review, 2017, v. 97, n. 3, p. 1197
- Article
21
- Boston University Law Review, 2015, v. 95, n. 2, p. 519
- Article
23
- Boston University Law Review, 2014, v. 94, n. 3, p. 835
- Article
24
- Texas International Law Journal, 2013, v. 48, n. 3, p. 357
- Article
25
- University of Pennsylvania Journal of Constitutional Law, 2011, v. 13, n. 3, p. 643
- Article
26
- University of Pennsylvania Journal of Constitutional Law, 2010, v. 13, n. 2, p. 337
- Mittal, Sonia;
- Weingast, Barry R.
- Article
28
- Díkaion, 2023, v. 32, n. 1, p. 1, doi. 10.5294/dika.2023.32.1.10
- González González, Félix Leonardo
- Article
29
- Díkaion, 2007, v. 21, n. 16, p. 31
- Article
31
- Law & Society Review, 1988, v. 21, n. 5, p. 777, doi. 10.1017/s0023921600028048
- Article
32
- Denver Law Review, 2023, v. 100, n. 3, p. 679
- Article
33
- Revista Thesis Juris, 2013, v. 2, n. 1, p. 49, doi. 10.5585/rtj.v2i1.40
- Cobianchi Figueiredo, Patrícia
- Article
34
- Journal of Supreme Court History, 2022, v. 47, n. 2, p. 197, doi. 10.1353/sch.2022.0025
- Article
35
- Journal of Supreme Court History, 2020, v. 45, n. 1, p. 66, doi. 10.1353/sch.2020.0021
- Article
37
- Constitutional Commentary, 2001, v. 18, n. 1, p. 5
- Article
38
- California Law Review, 1999, v. 87, n. 5, p. 1105, doi. 10.2307/3481039
- Article
39
- Review of Constitutional Studies, 2019, v. 24, n. 1, p. 123
- Article
41
- Asian Journal of Comparative Law, 2015, v. 10, n. 1, p. 23, doi. 10.1017/asjcl.2015.4
- Article
42
- Idaho Law Review, 2023, v. 59, n. 2, p. 410
- Article
43
- Houston Law Review, 2024, v. 61, n. 5, p. 1
- Article
44
- Houston Law Review, 2020, v. 57, n. 4, p. 885
- Article
45
- Wake Forest Law Review, 2013, v. 48, n. 2, p. 211
- Article
46
- Toruńskie Studia Polsko-Włoskie / Studi Polacco-Italiani di Toruń, 2022, n. 18, p. 193, doi. 10.12775/TSP-W.2022.017
- Article
47
- George Washington Law Review, 2012, v. 80, n. 6, p. 1794
- Article
50
- Cato Supreme Court Review, 2008, p. 161
- Article