Works matching Supreme Court and constitutional interpretation
2
- Arizona State Law Journal, 2019, v. 51, n. 1, p. 109
- Article
3
- Stanford Journal of International Law, 2019, v. 55, n. 1, p. 27
- Article
4
- German Law Journal, 2013, v. 14, n. 8, p. 1337, doi. 10.1017/s2071832200002285
- Article
5
- Chapman Law Review, 2021, v. 25, n. 1, p. 171
- Article
6
- Transnational Legal Theory, 2013, v. 4, n. 2, p. 227, doi. 10.5235/20414005.4.2.227
- de la Rasilla del Moral, Ignacio
- Article
7
- Iowa Law Review, 2007, v. 92, n. 3, p. 1037
- Article
8
- German Law Journal, 2013, v. 14, n. 8, p. 1297, doi. 10.1017/s2071832200002273
- Article
9
- Revista Española de Derecho Constitucional, 2024, n. 132, p. 45, doi. 10.18042/cepc/redc.132.02
- Article
10
- Stanford Journal of Civil Rights & Civil Liberties, 2012, v. 8, n. 1, p. 1
- Article
11
- Iowa Law Review, 2017, v. 102, n. 5, p. 2265
- Article
12
- Queen's Law Journal, 2021, v. 47, n. 1, p. 78
- Article
13
- Argumenta: Journal Law / Revista Jurídica, 2013, p. 283
- CASSEB, Henrique Morgado;
- AUGUSTO, Ilnah Toledo
- Article
14
- Journal of Anbar University for Law & Political Sciences, 2025, v. 15, n. 1, Part 1, p. 183, doi. 10.37651/aujlps.2024.154764.1380
- حلا جاسم كاظم;
- دق عادل طالب
- Article
15
- George Washington Law Review, 2012, v. 80, n. 6, p. 1794
- Article
16
- Journal of Human Rights, 2016, v. 15, n. 4, p. 477, doi. 10.1080/14754835.2015.1103163
- Article
17
- Columbia Journal of Transnational Law, 2021, v. 60, n. 1, p. 132
- Article
18
- Brigham Young University Law Review, 1999, v. 1999, n. 1, p. 1
- Article
19
- Brigham Young University Law Review, 1994, v. 1994, n. 4, p. 735
- Article
20
- Brookings Review, 2000, v. 18, n. 1, p. 24
- Article
21
- Právník, 2016, v. 155, n. 7, p. 639
- Article
22
- University of New Hampshire Law Review, 2018, v. 16, n. 2, p. 305
- Article
23
- Godišnjak Pravnog Fakulteta u Sarajevu, 2012, v. 55, p. 227
- Article
24
- Animal Law Review, 2013, v. 19, n. 2, p. 221
- Kerr, Jeffrey S.;
- Bernstein, Martina;
- Schwoerke, Amanda;
- Strugar, Matthew D.;
- Goodman, Jared S.
- Article
25
- Alberta Law Review, 2024, v. 61, n. 3, p. 671
- Article
27
- Common Law World Review, 2007, v. 36, n. 3, p. 220, doi. 10.1350/clwr.2007.36.3.220
- Article
28
- Public Administration Review, 1987, v. 47, n. 1, p. 93, doi. 10.2307/975476
- Kraemer, Kenneth L.;
- King, John Leslie
- Article
29
- Public Administration Review, 1985, v. 45, n. 6, p. 845, doi. 10.2307/975360
- Article
30
- Espaço Jurídico: Journal of Law, 2018, v. 19, n. 1, p. 25, doi. 10.18593/ejjl.v19i1.14457
- Lazzarotto Simioni, Rafael
- Article
31
- CATO Journal, 1995, v. 15, n. 2/3, p. 191
- Article
32
- Federal History, 2024, n. 16, p. 165
- Article
33
- Business & Politics, 2003, v. 5, n. 1, p. 7, doi. 10.1080/1369525032000100580
- Spiller, Pablo T.;
- Vanden Bergh, Richard G.
- Article
34
- Missouri Law Review, 2020, v. 85, n. 4, p. 1229
- Article
35
- Florida State University Law Review, 2016, v. 43, n. 2, p. 679
- Article
36
- Texas Law Review, 2018, v. 96, n. 3, p. 487
- Article
38
- Texas Law Review, 2013, v. 91, n. 7, p. 1739
- Berman, Mitchell N.;
- Toh, Kevin
- Article
40
- New Political Science (Duke University Press), 2024, v. 46, n. 3, p. 317, doi. 10.1080/07393148.2024.2386761
- Article
41
- Maryland Law Review, 2017, v. 76, n. 2, p. 309
- BOLDT, RICHARD;
- FRIEDMAN, DAN
- Article
42
- Review of Constitutional Studies, 2019, v. 24, n. 1, p. 123
- Article
44
- Boston University Law Review, 2025, v. 105, n. 2, p. 371
- Article
45
- Boston University Law Review, 2018, v. 98, n. 2, p. 541
- Article
46
- Boston University Law Review, 2017, v. 97, n. 3, p. 1197
- Article
47
- Boston University Law Review, 2015, v. 95, n. 2, p. 519
- Article
49
- Boston University Law Review, 2014, v. 94, n. 3, p. 835
- Article
50
- Texas Review of Law & Politics, 2006, v. 10, n. 2, p. 401
- Article