Legalised non-consensual sterilisation - eugenics put into practice before 1945, and the aftermath. Part 2: Europe.
- Published in:
- 2018
- By:
- Publication type:
- journal article
Works matching Sterilization (Birth control) -- Law %26 legislation
Results: 50
1
2
Voluntary Sterilization for Childfree Women.
- Published in:
- Hastings Center Report, 2013, v. 43, n. 6, p. 36, doi. 10.1002/hast.216
- By:
- Publication type:
- Article
3
Disproportionate Sterilization of Latinos Under California's Eugenic Sterilization Program, 1920-1945.
- Published in:
- American Journal of Public Health, 2018, v. 108, n. 5, p. 611, doi. 10.2105/AJPH.2018.304369
- By:
- Publication type:
- Article
4
Forced and coerced sterilization of women in Europe
- Published in:
- 2011
- By:
- Publication type:
- journal article
5
The effect of urine on the endometrium
- Published in:
- 2007
- By:
- Publication type:
- journal article
6
The introduction of reversible sterilization
- Published in:
- 2007
- By:
- Publication type:
- commentary
7
THE DOERS OF GOOD. SCANDINAVIAN HISTORIANS REVISE THE SOCIAL HISTORY OF EUGENICS(1997-2001).
- Published in:
- Medicina nei Secoli: Arte e Scienza, 2008, v. 20, n. 3, p. 937
- By:
- Publication type:
- Article
8
Special Medical Procedures, Sterilisation of Minors and the Role of the Family Court.
- Published in:
- Psychiatry, Psychology & Law, 2007, v. 14, n. 2, p. 199, doi. 10.1375/pplt.14.2.199
- By:
- Publication type:
- Article
9
Republicans, Democrats, & Doctors: The Lawmakers Who Wrote Sterilization Laws.
- Published in:
- Journal of Law, Medicine & Ethics, 2023, v. 51, n. 1, p. 123, doi. 10.1017/jme.2023.47
- By:
- Publication type:
- Article
10
In brief.
- Published in:
- Learning Disability Practice, 2015, v. 18, n. 2, p. 6
- Publication type:
- Article
11
Era of greater openness in mental capacity judgements.
- Published in:
- 2011
- Publication type:
- Opinion
12
Sterilization in Alberta, 1928 to 1972: Gender Matters.
- Published in:
- Canadian Review of Sociology, 2008, v. 45, n. 4, p. 247, doi. 10.1111/j.1755-618X.2008.00014.x
- By:
- Publication type:
- Article
13
THE EUGENICS MOVEMENT IN NORTH CAROLINA.
- Published in:
- North Carolina Law Review, 2016, v. 94, n. 6, p. 1871
- By:
- Publication type:
- Article
14
Courts... authority to sterilize.
- Published in:
- American Bar Association Journal, 1981, v. 67, n. 8, p. 1043
- Publication type:
- Article
15
ENSURING THAT FEDERAL CIRCUIT COURTS ADHERE TO THE SPIRIT OF THE LAW: WHY LEGALLY AND NON-LEGALLY MARRIED SPOUSES DESERVE EXPLICIT ASYLUM PROTECTION UNDER SECTION 601 OF THE ILLEGAL IMMIGRATION REFORM AND IMMIGRANT RESPONSIBILITY ACT.
- Published in:
- Creighton Law Review, 2009, v. 42, n. 2, p. 181
- Publication type:
- Article
16
Population 'Quality' and 'Fitness for Parenthood' in the Light of State Eugenic Sterilization Experience, 1907-1966.
- Published in:
- Population Studies, 1967, v. 21, n. 3, p. 295, doi. 10.1080/00324728.1967.10406105
- By:
- Publication type:
- Article
17
Claiming Rosa Parks: conservative Catholic bids for ‘rights’ in contemporary Latin America.
- Published in:
- Culture, Health & Sexuality, 2014, v. 16, n. 10, p. 1245, doi. 10.1080/13691058.2014.885086
- By:
- Publication type:
- Article
18
Healthcare and Law Digest.
- Published in:
- 2014
- Publication type:
- Editorial
19
The involuntary sterilisation of marginalised women: power, discrimination, and intersectionality.
- Published in:
- Griffith Law Review, 2016, v. 25, n. 1, p. 45, doi. 10.1080/10383441.2016.1179838
- By:
- Publication type:
- Article
20
Misconceptions about Wrongful Conception.
- Published in:
- Modern Law Review, 2002, v. 65, n. 6, p. 883, doi. 10.1111/1468-2230.00414
- By:
- Publication type:
- Article
21
Sterilization of the Retarded: A Problem or a Solution?
- Published in:
- California Law Review, 1974, v. 62, n. 3, p. 917, doi. 10.2307/3479751
- By:
- Publication type:
- Article
22
ADDICTION IS A PSYCHIATRIC DISORDER - WHAT HAVE WE LEARNED FROM HISTORY?
- Published in:
- Addiction, 2012, v. 107, n. 6, p. 1043, doi. 10.1111/j.1360-0443.2012.03786.x
- By:
- Publication type:
- Article
23
A NEW CLASS OF UNDESIRABLES: THE EMERGENCE OF STERILIZATION IN PLEA BARGAINING.
- Published in:
- Journal of the Legal Profession, 2019, v. 43, n. 2, p. 297
- By:
- Publication type:
- Article
24
FOR-PROFIT CRUSADERS: THE ACCOMMODATION OF FOR-PROFIT ENTITIES IN THE CONTRACEPTION MANDATE.
- Published in:
- Capital University Law Review, 2015, v. 43, n. 4, p. 963
- By:
- Publication type:
- Article
25
MARRIAGE, STERILIZATION AND COMMITMENT LAWS AIMED AT DECREASING MENTAL DEFICIENCY.
- Published in:
- Journal of the American Institute of Criminal Law & Criminology, 1914, v. 5, n. 3, p. 364, doi. 10.2307/1133010
- By:
- Publication type:
- Article
26
NOTES ON CURRENT AND RECENT EVENTS.
- Published in:
- Journal of the American Institute of Criminal Law & Criminology, 1914, v. 4, n. 5, p. 746
- Publication type:
- Article
27
Decision of the Supreme Court of New Jersey on the Sterilization Law.
- Published in:
- Journal of the American Institute of Criminal Law & Criminology, 1914, v. 4, n. 5, p. 733
- Publication type:
- Article
28
Social Workers, Conscience Protection and Practice.
- Published in:
- Journal of Religion & Spirituality in Social Work, 2013, v. 32, n. 2, p. 114, doi. 10.1080/15426432.2013.779153
- By:
- Publication type:
- Article
29
Female and male sterilization and refertilization in Sweden.
- Published in:
- 1997
- By:
- Publication type:
- journal article
30
‘The Germans are beating us at our own game’.
- Published in:
- History of the Human Sciences, 2016, v. 29, n. 3, p. 25, doi. 10.1177/0952695116631230
- By:
- Publication type:
- Article
31
STERILISING WITHOUT CONSENT.
- Published in:
- Alternative Law Journal, 2012, v. 37, n. 3, p. 175, doi. 10.1177/1037969X1203700307
- By:
- Publication type:
- Article
32
DOES THE MENTAL CAPACITY ACT 2005 ADEQUATELY PROTECT PERSONS WITH LEARNING DIFFICULTIES AGAINST NEEDLESS NON-CONSENSUAL STERILISATION?
- Published in:
- Plymouth Law & Criminal Justice Review, 2015, v. 7, p. 167
- By:
- Publication type:
- Article
33
COMPARING GERMAN AND ENGLISH LAW ON NON-CONSENSUAL STERILISATION: A DIFFERENCE IN APPROACH.
- Published in:
- Medical Law Review, 1997, v. 5, n. 3, p. 269, doi. 10.1093/medlaw/5.3.269
- By:
- Publication type:
- Article
34
The Alberta Eugenics Movement and the 1937 Amendment to the Sexual Sterilization Act.
- Published in:
- Past Imperfect, 2011, v. 17, p. 90
- By:
- Publication type:
- Article
35
Facts and ideas from anywhere.
- Published in:
- 2020
- By:
- Publication type:
- Book Review
36
Forced Sterilizations of HIV-Positive Women: A Global Ethics and Policy Failure.
- Published in:
- AMA Journal of Ethics, 2015, v. 17, n. 10, p. 952, doi. 10.1001/journalofethics.2015.17.10.pfor2-1510
- By:
- Publication type:
- Article
37
Targeted encouragement of sexually active drug- and alcohol-dependent women to use long-acting reversible contraception is legitimate.
- Published in:
- Obstetrician & Gynaecologist, 2014, v. 16, n. 4, p. 269, doi. 10.1111/tog.12134
- By:
- Publication type:
- Article
38
Promised Objectivity: Americans Receive Planned Parenthood Ideology.
- Published in:
- Human Life Review, 2011, v. 37, n. 4, p. 115
- By:
- Publication type:
- Article
39
Yearning toward Carrie Buck.
- Published in:
- 2014
- By:
- Publication type:
- Essay
40
THE STERILISATION OF CHILDREN WITH INTELLECTUAL DISABILITIES -- DEFECTIVE LAW, UNLAWFUL ACTIVITY AND THE NEED FOR A SERVICE ORIENTED APPROACH.
- Published in:
- Australian Journal of Social Issues (Australian Council of Social Service), 1998, v. 33, n. 2, p. 155, doi. 10.1002/j.1839-4655.1998.tb01329.x
- By:
- Publication type:
- Article
41
Contraception and Sterilization--Mentally Incompetent Minors--Ruby v. Massey.
- Published in:
- American Journal of Law & Medicine, 1979, v. 5, n. 1, p. 18
- By:
- Publication type:
- Article
42
Rivera v. New York.
- Published in:
- American Journal of Law & Medicine, 1978, v. 4, n. 3, p. 280
- Publication type:
- Article
43
Walker v. Pierce.
- Published in:
- American Journal of Law & Medicine, 1977, v. 3, n. 3, p. 346
- Publication type:
- Article
44
Sparkman v. McFarlin.
- Published in:
- American Journal of Law & Medicine, 1977, v. 3, n. 3, p. 345
- Publication type:
- Article
45
Polskie środowisko neuropsychiatryczne wobec ustaw sterylizacyjnych w latach trzydziestych XX wieku.
- Published in:
- Psychiatria Polska, 2014, v. 48, n. 1, p. 205
- By:
- Publication type:
- Article
46
Molly Ladd-Taylor: Fixing the Poor: Eugenic Sterilization and Child Welfare in the Twentieth Century: Baltimore, MD: John Hopkins University Press, 2017, 226 pp, ISBN 9781421437996.
- Published in:
- 2020
- By:
- Publication type:
- Book Review
47
Redressing forced sterilisation: the role of the medical profession.
- Published in:
- 2020
- By:
- Publication type:
- journal article
48
Sterilization and the British Conservative party: rethinking the failure of the Eugenics Society's political strategy in the nineteen-thirties.
- Published in:
- Historical Research, 2015, v. 88, n. 242, p. 716, doi. 10.1111/1468-2281.12084
- By:
- Publication type:
- Article
49
EX TENEBRIS LUX: BUCK V. BELL AND THE AMERICANS WITH DISABILITIES ACT.
- Published in:
- University of Toledo Law Review, 2019, v. 51, n. 1, p. 57
- By:
- Publication type:
- Article
50
Why Did the Nazis Sterilize the Blind? Genetics and the Shaping of the Sterilization Law of 1933.
- Published in:
- Central European History (Cambridge University Press / UK), 2019, v. 52, n. 2, p. 289, doi. 10.1017/S000893891900030X
- By:
- Publication type:
- Article