Works matching Statutory interpretation
1
- Legal Studies, 2024, v. 44, n. 3, p. 1, doi. 10.1017/lst.2023.44
- Article
2
- Oxford Journal of Legal Studies, 2017, v. 37, n. 1, p. 134, doi. 10.1093/ojls/gqw011
- Article
3
- Theory & Practice of Legislation, 2015, v. 3, n. 1, p. 45, doi. 10.1080/20508840.2015.1041704
- Article
4
- Journal of Multilingual & Multicultural Development, 2012, v. 33, n. 5, p. 481, doi. 10.1080/01434632.2012.680462
- Article
5
- Canadian Tax Journal / Revue Fiscale Canadienne, 2014, v. 62, n. 1, p. 192
- Diep, Nancy;
- Kopstein, Robert
- Article
6
- Canadian Tax Journal / Revue Fiscale Canadienne, 2013, v. 61, n. 2, p. 367
- Article
7
- Common Law World Review, 2018, v. 47, n. 3, p. 217, doi. 10.1177/1473779518793843
- Article
8
- Medical Law Review, 2019, v. 27, n. 1, p. 1, doi. 10.1093/medlaw/fwy015
- Harris, Andrew;
- Walker, Andrew
- Article
9
- Law Teacher, 2014, v. 48, n. 3, p. 321, doi. 10.1080/03069400.2014.965953
- Curró, Gina;
- Longo, Michael
- Article
10
- Texas Review of Law & Politics, 2016, v. 21, n. 1, p. 235
- Article
11
- San Diego Law Review, 2007, v. 44, n. 4, p. 1027
- Article
12
- Manchester Review of Law, crime & Ethics, 2024, v. 12, p. 162
- Article
13
- California Law Review, 1945, v. 33, n. 2, p. 219, doi. 10.2307/3477335
- Article
14
- Kansas Law Review, 2022, v. 70, n. 3, p. 505
- Article
15
- University of Illinois Law Review, 2012, v. 2012, n. 4, p. 1103
- Article
16
- George Mason Law Review, 2024, v. 31, n. 3, p. 839
- Article
17
- George Mason Law Review, 2024, v. 31, n. 2, p. 587
- Article
18
- Southern Illinois University Law Journal, 2013, v. 37, n. 4, p. 845
- Article
19
- William & Mary Law Review, 2014, v. 56, n. 2, p. 467
- Article
20
- William & Mary Law Review, 2013, v. 54, n. 4, p. 1251
- Article
21
- University of Chicago Law Review, 2024, v. 91, n. 5, p. 1501
- Article
22
- University of Chicago Law Review, 2017, v. 84, n. 1, p. 177
- Article
23
- New York University Law Review, 2020, v. 95, n. 2, p. 363
- Article
24
- Arizona Law Review, 2014, v. 56, n. 4, p. 1227
- Article
25
- Seton Hall Journal of Sports & Entertainment Law, 2013, v. 23, n. 1, p. 69
- Article
26
- Cornell Law Review, 2015, v. 100, n. 6, p. 182
- Article
27
- Minnesota Law Review, 2019, v. 103, n. 5, p. 2255
- Article
28
- Yale Law Journal, 2024, v. 134, n. 2, p. 447
- Article
29
- Yale Law Journal, 2016, v. 126, n. 2, p. 438
- Article
30
- Yale Law Journal, 2011, v. 120, n. 8, p. 1898
- Article
31
- Albany Law Review, 2005, v. 68, n. 4, p. 949
- Article
32
- South Carolina Law Review, 2012, v. 64, n. 2, p. 221
- Gifford, Donald G.;
- Reynolds, William L.;
- Murad, Andrew M.
- Article
33
- Brooklyn Law Review, 2021, v. 86, n. 2, p. 357
- Article
34
- Administrative Law Review, 2010, v. 62, n. 2, p. 291
- Article
35
- Boston University Law Review, 2015, v. 95, n. 1, p. 209
- Article
37
- Willamette Law Review, 2011, v. 47, n. 4, p. 587
- Article
38
- Washington University Journal of Law & Policy, 2019, v. 58, p. 343
- Article
39
- Missouri Law Review, 2016, v. 81, n. 4, p. 1127
- Article
40
- Texas Law Review, 2005, v. 84, n. 2, p. 339
- Article
41
- Journal of Law & Politics, 2015, v. 30, n. 3, p. 341
- Article
42
- Opinión Jurídica, 2022, v. 21, n. 45, p. 321, doi. 10.22395/ojum.v21n45a14
- Article
43
- University of New South Wales Law Journal, 2018, v. 41, n. 4, p. 1083, doi. 10.53637/prvr3704
- Article
44
- Georgia Law Review, 2016, v. 51, n. 1, p. 121
- Article
45
- Stanford Law Review, 2015, v. 67, n. 5, p. 999
- Article
46
- Ratio Juris, 2000, v. 13, n. 4, p. 364, doi. 10.1111/1467-9337.00162
- Article
47
- Statute Law Review, 2018, v. 39, n. 1, p. 27, doi. 10.1093/slr/hmw030
- Dharmananda, Jacinta;
- Lane, Patricia
- Article
48
- Statute Law Review, 2011, v. 32, n. 1, p. 54, doi. 10.1093/slr/hmq014
- Article
49
- Statute Law Review, 1999, v. 20, n. 2, p. 144, doi. 10.1093/slr/20.2.144
- Article
50
- Northwestern University Law Review, 2019, v. 114, n. 2, p. 269
- Article