Works matching States’ rights
1
- Political Quarterly, 2022, v. 93, n. 4, p. 612, doi. 10.1111/1467-923X.13193
- Article
2
- Ethnic & Racial Studies, 2021, v. 44, n. 11, p. 1955, doi. 10.1080/01419870.2020.1817518
- Article
3
- American Journal of Trial Advocacy, 2023, v. 47, n. 1, p. 175
- Article
4
- Boston University Law Review, 2025, v. 105, n. 1, p. 163
- Article
5
- Dissent (0012-3846), 2018, v. 65, n. 3, p. 111, doi. 10.1353/dss.2018.0060
- Article
6
- Southern Historian, 2014, v. 35, p. 22
- Article
7
- Michigan Historical Review, 2016, v. 42, n. 2, p. 53, doi. 10.5342/michhistrevi.42.2.0053
- Article
8
- Washington & Lee Law Review, 2024, v. 81, n. 2, p. 775
- Article
9
- Harvard Journal of Law & Public Policy, 1998, v. 22, n. 1, p. 95
- Article
10
- Journal of the Civil War Era, 2019, v. 9, n. 4, p. 612, doi. 10.1353/cwe.2019.0076
- Article
11
- William & Mary Law Review, 2006, v. 47, n. 4, p. 1279
- Article
12
- William & Mary Law Review, 2004, v. 46, n. 1, p. 213
- Article
13
- Public Health Ethics, 2009, v. 2, n. 2, p. 158, doi. 10.1093/phe/php011
- Article
14
- Cleveland State Law Review, 2014, v. 63, n. 1, p. 101
- Article
15
- Michigan State International Law Review, 2013, v. 21, n. 2, p. 461
- Article
17
- North Carolina Historical Review, 2014, v. 91, n. 1, p. 30
- Article
20
- 2010
- Orbach, Barak Y.;
- Callahan, Kathleen S.;
- Lindemenn, Lisa M.
- Essay
22
- Harvard Journal of Law & Public Policy, 2022, v. 45, n. 2, p. 481
- Article
24
- Social Alternatives, 1994, v. 13, n. 1, p. 29
- Article
25
- Indiana Magazine of History, 2015, v. 111, n. 4, p. 381, doi. 10.5378/indimagahist.111.4.0381
- Article
26
- Law & Contemporary Problems, 2008, v. 71, n. 3, p. 39
- Article
28
- Texas International Law Journal, 2017, v. 52, n. 1, p. 71
- Article
29
- Virginia Law Review, 2007, v. 93, n. 5, p. 1315
- Article
30
- Canadian Yearbook of International Law, 2011, v. 49, p. 177
- Article
31
- Albany Law Review, 2002, v. 65, n. 4, p. 1161
- Article
32
- Journal of the Civil War Era, 2017, v. 7, n. 2, p. 242, doi. 10.1353/cwe.2017.0036
- Article
33
- Journal of Law, Medicine & Ethics, 2020, v. 48, p. 83, doi. 10.1177/1073110520979405
- Higgins, Hilary J.;
- Lowy, Jonathan E.;
- Rising, Andrew J.
- Article
34
- Washington Quarterly, 2018, v. 41, n. 1, p. 27, doi. 10.1080/0163660X.2018.1445356
- Engstrom, David Freeman;
- Weinstein, Jeremy M.
- Article
35
- Journal of Insurance Regulation, 2008, v. 26, n. 4, p. 91
- Article
36
- University of Toledo Law Review, 2014, v. 46, n. 1, p. 221
- Article
37
- Ave Maria Law Review, 2012, v. 11, n. 1, p. 103
- Article
38
- Arkansas Law Review (1968-present), 2014, v. 67, n. 1, p. 81
- Article
39
- Arizona Law Review, 2020, v. 62, n. 2, p. 539
- Article
41
- Law & History Review, 2015, v. 33, n. 1, p. 1, doi. 10.1017/S073824801400056X
- Article
44
- Arbitration Journal, 1969, v. 24, n. 3, p. 189
- Article
45
- Connecticut Law Review, 2014, v. 47, n. 2, p. 481
- CHARLES, GUY-URIEL E.;
- FUENTES-ROHWER, LUIS
- Article
46
- Yale Law Journal, 2011, v. 120, n. 5, p. 1192
- Article
48
- Romanian Case Law Review / Revista Română de Jurisprudenţă, 2018, n. 4, p. 183
- Article
49
- Journal of Administrative Law & Administrative Sciences / İdare Hukuku ve İlimleri Dergisi, 2023, n. 22, p. 167, doi. 10.26650/ihid.22.007
- Article
50
- Comparative Studies in Society & History, 2023, v. 65, n. 4, p. 801, doi. 10.1017/S0010417523000191
- Article