Works matching Search warrant requirement
1
- Journal of Criminal Law & Criminology (08852731), 1951, v. 41, n. 5, p. 710
- Article
2
- Boston College Law Review, 2015, v. 56, n. 5, p. 1981
- Article
3
- New England Law Review, 2014, v. 49, n. 1, p. 145
- Article
4
- Vanderbilt Law Review, 2016, v. 69, n. 3, p. 585
- Article
5
- EurAmerica, 2018, v. 48, n. 2, p. 267
- Article
6
- California Law Review, 2018, v. 106, n. 4, p. 1061
- Article
7
- Bench & Bar of Minnesota, 2024, v. 81, n. 9, p. 29
- Foertsch, Samantha;
- Foertsch, Stephen
- Article
8
- Journal of Criminal Law & Criminology, 2016, v. 106, n. 2, p. 167
- BLOOM, ROBERT M.;
- CLARK, WILLIAM T.
- Article
9
- California Law Review, 1961, v. 49, n. 3, p. 474, doi. 10.2307/3478464
- Article
10
- Brigham Young University Law Review, 2023, v. 48, n. 4, p. 1135
- Article
11
- Boston College Environmental Affairs Law Review, 1996, v. 23, n. 2, p. 327
- Article
12
- American Business Law Journal, 1974, v. 11, n. 3, p. 294
- Article
13
- Journal of Criminal Law, Criminology & Police Science, 1968, v. 59, n. 3, p. 399
- Article
14
- Kansas Law Review, 2014, v. 62, p. 1461
- Article
15
- University of Illinois Law Review, 2020, v. 2020, n. 4, p. 1249
- Article
16
- George Mason Law Review, 2012, v. 20, n. 1, p. 207
- Article
17
- Southern California Law Review, 2017, v. 90, n. 2, p. 307
- Article
18
- Political Sciences / Politické Vedy, 2019, v. 22, n. 1, p. 229, doi. 10.24040/politickevedy.2019.22.1.229-246
- Article
19
- Fordham Urban Law Journal, 2009, v. 36, n. 5, p. 977
- Article
20
- Cornell Law Review, 2015, v. 101, n. 1, p. 187
- Article
21
- Federal History, 2024, n. 16, p. 157
- Article
22
- Journal of Science & Technology Law, 2018, v. 24, n. 1, p. 1
- Article
23
- Loyola of Los Angeles Law Review, 2012, v. 45, n. 3, p. 985
- Article
24
- Criminal Justice Studies, 2011, v. 24, n. 4, p. 321, doi. 10.1080/1478601X.2011.625693
- Hemmens, Craig;
- Karas, Stephanie
- Article
25
- Türkiye Adalet Akademisi Dergisi, 2013, v. 4, n. 14, p. 501
- Article
26
- Boston University Law Review, 2016, v. 96, n. 2, p. 425
- Article
27
- Yale Journal on Regulation, 2011, v. 28, n. 2, p. 367
- Article
28
- Washington University Journal of Law & Policy, 2012, v. 39, p. 337
- Article
29
- New Mexico Law Review, 2011, v. 41, n. 1, p. 69
- Article
30
- Missouri Law Review, 2020, v. 85, n. 3, p. 883
- Article
31
- Tulane Law Review, 2012, v. 87, n. 2, p. 353
- Article
32
- Ohio State Law Journal, 2022, v. 83, n. 5, p. 953
- Article
33
- University of Miami Law Review, 2012, v. 66, n. 2, p. 471
- Article
34
- Florida Bar Journal, 2013, v. 87, n. 9, p. 9
- Article
36
- South Dakota Law Review, 2020, v. 65, n. 1, p. 175
- Article
37
- McGill Law Journal, 2005, v. 50, n. 1, p. 127
- Article
38
- American Bar Association Journal, 1978, v. 64, n. 7, p. 964
- Article
39
- Emory Law Journal, 2017, v. 66, n. 3, p. 527
- Article
40
- St. Thomas Law Review, 2021, v. 33, n. 2, p. 283
- Article
41
- CounterPunch, 2025, p. 1
- Article
42
- Washington University Law Review, 2023, v. 100, n. 4, p. 1057
- Article
43
- New England Journal on Criminal & Civil Confinement, 2012, v. 38, n. 1, p. 101
- Article