Works matching Sandra Day O'Connor
1
- Washington University Journal of Law & Policy, 2020, v. 62, p. 5
- Article
2
- Journal of Supreme Court History, 2006, v. 31, n. 2, p. 107, doi. 10.1353/sch.2006.0011
- Article
3
- American Bar Association Journal, 1983, v. 69, n. 10, p. 1394
- Article
4
- Texas Wesleyan Law Review, 2010, v. 16, n. 3, p. 323, doi. 10.37419/twlr.v16.i3.1
- Article
5
- Journal of Philosophy of Education, 2021, v. 55, n. 1, p. 83, doi. 10.1111/1467-9752.12487
- DHINGRA, NEIL;
- SCRIBNER, CAMPBELL
- Article
6
- Loyola Law Review, 2012, v. 58, n. 1, p. 39
- Article
7
- Yale Law Journal, 2024, v. 133, n. 8, p. 2526
- Article
8
- Willamette Law Review, 2015, v. 52, n. 1, p. 99
- Article
9
- Judges' Journal, 2012, v. 51, n. 3, p. 20
- Article
10
- Stanford Law Review, 2006, v. 58, n. 6, p. 1731
- Article
11
- Stanford Law Review, 2006, v. 58, n. 6, p. 1663
- Article
12
- Stanford Law Review, 2006, v. 58, n. 6, p. 1705
- Article
13
- Arizona State Law Journal, 2011, v. 43, n. 1, p. 289
- Article
14
- University of New Hampshire Law Review, 2012, v. 10, n. 2, p. 239
- Article
16
- Columbia Law Review, 2020, v. 120, n. 7, p. 2017
- Article
17
- Stanford Law Review, 2024, v. 76, p. 1901
- Article
18
- Stanford Law Review, 2024, v. 76, p. 1881
- Article
19
- Stanford Law Review, 2024, v. 76, p. 1865
- Article
20
- Stanford Law Review, 2024, v. 76, p. 1863
- Article
21
- Stanford Law Review, 2024, v. 76, p. 1855
- Article
22
- Arizona State Law Journal, 2024, v. 56, n. 4, p. xxi
- Article
23
- Arizona State Law Journal, 2011, v. 43, n. 2, p. 289
- Article
24
- Journal of Women, Politics & Policy, 2013, v. 34, n. 1, p. 23, doi. 10.1080/1554477X.2013.747882
- Swers, Michele L.;
- Kim, Christine C.
- Article
26
- University of Pennsylvania Journal of Business Law, 2018, v. 20, n. 3, p. 520
- Article
33
- Quinnipiac Law Review, 2017, v. 35, n. 3, p. 391
- Article
35
- Judicature, 2021, v. 105, n. 1, p. 80
- Article
37
- Change, 2005, v. 37, n. 5, p. 5
- Fields, Cheryl;
- O'Connor, Sandra Day
- Article
39
- Stanford Law Review, 2006, v. 58, n. 6, p. 1673
- Article
41
- SMU Law Review, 2014, v. 67, n. 4, p. 693
- Article
42
- Valparaiso University Law Review, 2019, v. 53, n. 4, p. 947
- Article
43
- William & Mary Law Review, 1995, v. 37, n. 1, p. 9
- Article
44
- Journal of Supreme Court History, 2010, v. 35, n. 1, p. 1, doi. 10.1353/sch.2010.0020
- Article
45
- Journal of Supreme Court History, 2006, v. 31, n. 1, p. 5, doi. 10.1353/sch.2006.0022
- Article
46
- Journal of Supreme Court History, 2003, v. 28, n. 2, p. 157, doi. 10.1111/1540-5818.00061
- Article
47
- University of Pennsylvania Law Review, 2003, v. 152, n. 1, p. 1
- Article
48
- Chinese Journal of International Law, 2003, v. 2, n. 1, p. 1, doi. 10.1093/oxfordjournals.cjilaw.a000463
- Article
49
- 2014
- STEVENS, JOHN PAUL;
- O'CONNOR, SANDRA DAY;
- KEITH, DAMON J.;
- JONES, NATHANIEL R.;
- BOGGS, DANNY J.;
- BATCHELDER, ALICE M.;
- MICHELSON, LAURIE J.
- Obituary
50
- Cornell International Law Journal, 2011, v. 44, n. 1, p. 3
- O'Connor, Sandra Day;
- Azzarelli, Kim K.
- Article