Works matching Right to trial by jury
1
- Iowa Law Review, 2014, v. 99, n. 2, p. 919
- Article
2
- Washington & Lee Law Review, 2021, v. 78, n. 1, p. 519
- Article
3
- American Journal of Legal History, 2023, v. 63, n. 4, p. 281, doi. 10.1093/ajlh/njad028
- Article
4
- William & Mary Bill of Rights Journal, 2014, v. 22, n. 3, p. 811
- Article
5
- Arizona State Law Journal, 2016, v. 48, n. 3, p. 481
- Article
6
- Indiana Law Review, 2019, v. 52, n. 1, p. 105
- Article
7
- Advocate (05154987), 2022, v. 65, n. 5, p. 26
- Article
8
- New England Law Review, 2014, v. 48, n. 3, p. 609
- Article
9
- George Mason University Civil Rights Law Journal, 2019, v. 30, n. 1, p. 65
- Article
10
- Duke Law Journal, 2022, v. 72, n. 3, p. 599
- Article
11
- New York University Annual Survey of American Law, 2015, v. 71, n. 2, p. 147
- MARTENS, MATTHEW T.;
- PAREDES, TROY A.
- Article
12
- Missouri Law Review, 2013, v. 78, n. 2, p. 601
- Article
13
- Washington & Lee Law Review, 2021, v. 78, n. 1, p. 585
- Article
14
- Southern Illinois University Law Journal, 2014, v. 38, n. 3, p. 491
- Article
15
- William Mitchell Law Review, 2013, v. 39, n. 1, p. 245
- Article
16
- William Mitchell Law Review, 2012, v. 38, n. 1, p. 245
- Article
17
- Regent University Law Review, 2018, v. 31, n. 1, p. 69
- Article
18
- University of Toledo Law Review, 2016, v. 48, n. 1, p. 169
- Article
19
- Oregon Law Review, 2018, v. 96, n. 2, p. 691
- Article
20
- Oregon Law Review, 2018, v. 96, n. 2, p. 477
- Article
21
- Oregon Law Review, 2018, v. 96, n. 2, p. 489
- PECK, ROBERT S.;
- CHEMERINSKY, ERWIN
- Article
22
- Oregon Law Review, 2018, v. 96, n. 2, p. 561
- Article
23
- Bench & Bar of Minnesota, 2021, v. 78, n. 5, p. 45
- Article
24
- University of Cincinnati Law Review, 2022, v. 90, n. 3, p. 951
- Article
25
- American Journal of Trial Advocacy, 2021, v. 45, n. 1, p. 81
- Pulley Radwan, Theresa J.
- Article
26
- North East Journal of Legal Studies, 2020, v. 40, p. 1
- Article
27
- William & Mary Bill of Rights Journal, 2014, v. 23, n. 2, p. 559
- Article
28
- Mercer Law Review, 2022, v. 73, n. 3, p. 1011
- Article
29
- Maine Law Review, 2017, v. 69, n. 1, p. 170
- Article
30
- Tulane Maritime Law Journal, 2024, v. 48, n. 2, p. 165
- Article
31
- Creighton Law Review, 2020, v. 53, n. 2, p. 283
- Article
32
- Maryland Law Review, 2013, v. 72, n. 3, p. 607
- Article
33
- Emory Law Journal, 2019, v. 69, n. 2, p. 273
- Thomas, Suja A.;
- Stich, Collin
- Article
34
- Emory Law Journal, 2018, v. 67, n. 5, p. 975
- Article
35
- University of Louisville Law Review, 2024, v. 62, n. 2, p. 293
- Article
37
- Harvard Journal of Law & Public Policy, 2020, v. 43, n. 3, p. 815
- Article
38
- Journal of Criminal Law & Criminology, 2024, v. 114, n. 2, p. 381
- Article
39
- UCLA Law Review, 2012, v. 60, n. 1, p. 262
- Article
40
- Washington & Lee Law Review, 2018, v. 75, n. 2, p. 703
- Article
41
- Washington & Lee Law Review, 2012, v. 69, n. 3, p. 1297
- Article
42
- Indiana Law Journal, 2009, v. 84, n. 2, p. 397
- Article
45
- American University Law Review, 2013, v. 62, n. 3, p. 701
- Article
46
- American Journal of Trial Advocacy, 2016, v. 40, n. 1, p. 1
- Article
47
- Historian, 2007, v. 69, n. 4, p. 663, doi. 10.1111/j.1540-6563.2007.00193.x
- Carney, Thomas E.;
- Kolb, Susan
- Article
48
- Cornell Law Review, 2014, v. 99, n. 3, p. 659
- Article
49
- Advocate (05154987), 2020, v. 63, n. 8, p. 20
- Article
50
- Widener Commonwealth Law Review, 2025, v. 34, n. 1, p. 71
- Article