Works matching Right to counsel and the Supreme Court
1
- Juridica International, 2015, v. 23, p. 124, doi. 10.12697/JI.2015.23.13
- Article
2
- Duquesne Law Review, 2013, v. 51, n. 3, p. 735
- Article
3
- Juvenile & Family Law Digest, 2011, v. 43, n. 8, p. 13
- Article
4
- Juvenile & Family Law Digest, 2011, v. 43, n. 6, p. 21
- Article
5
- Juvenile & Family Law Digest, 2011, v. 43, n. 8, p. 2
- Article
6
- Rutgers Law Journal, 2010, v. 41, n. 4, p. 1063
- Article
7
- Psychology, Crime & Law, 2014, v. 20, n. 8, p. 741, doi. 10.1080/1068316X.2013.854795
- Patry, Marc W.;
- Smith, Steven M.;
- Adams, Nicole M.
- Article
8
- Loyola Law Review, 2012, v. 58, n. 1, p. 275
- Article
9
- Texas Tech Law Review, 2012, v. 45, n. 1, p. 267
- Article
10
- American Journal of Criminal Justice, 1985, v. 10, n. 1, p. 22, doi. 10.1007/BF02888874
- Article
11
- Journal of Criminal Law, Criminology & Police Science, 1972, v. 63, n. 4, p. 473, doi. 10.2307/1141798
- Article
12
- Journal of Criminal Law, Criminology & Police Science, 1971, v. 62, n. 3, p. 363, doi. 10.2307/1142175
- Article
13
- Journal of Criminal Law, Criminology & Police Science, 1968, v. 59, n. 2, p. 270
- Article
14
- Iowa Law Review, 2014, v. 99, n. 5, p. 2219
- Article
15
- Iowa Law Review, 2014, v. 99, n. 5, p. 2131
- Article
16
- Cleveland State Law Review, 2017, v. 65, n. 2, p. 129
- Article
17
- Florida Bar Journal, 2003, v. 77, n. 3, p. 6
- Article
18
- Nevada Law Journal, 2017, v. 17, n. 2, p. 401
- Article
19
- Missouri Law Review, 2017, v. 82, n. 1, p. 133
- Article
20
- Stanford Law Review, 2017, v. 69, n. 5, p. 1541
- Article
21
- Oklahoma City University Law Review, 2013, v. 38, n. 1, p. 161
- Article
22
- California Law Review, 2024, v. 112, p. 55, doi. 10.15779/Z38930NW4D
- Article
23
- Touro Law Review, 2013, v. 29, n. 4, p. 1469
- Article
24
- Touro Law Review, 2013, v. 29, n. 4, p. 1333
- Article
25
- Touro Law Review, 2013, v. 29, n. 4, p. 1453
- Article
26
- St. John's Law Review, 2013, v. 87, n. 2/3, p. 669
- Article
27
- American University Law Review, 2013, v. 63, n. 1, p. 219
- Article
28
- Denver Law Review, 2019, v. 96, n. 3, p. 733
- Article
29
- Boston College Journal of Law & Social Justice, 2012, v. 32, n. 1, p. 31
- Article
30
- Journal of Criminal Law & Criminology, 2024, v. 114, n. 2, p. 381
- Article
31
- Brigham Young University Law Review, 2024, v. 50, n. 1, p. 155
- Article
32
- DePaul Journal for Social Justice, 2015, v. 8, n. 2, p. 287
- Article
33
- Journal of Criminal Law, Criminology & Police Science, 1966, v. 57, n. 3, p. 271, doi. 10.2307/1140723
- Article
34
- Journal of Criminal Law, Criminology & Police Science, 1965, v. 56, n. 2, p. 143, doi. 10.2307/1140502
- Article
36
- George Mason University Civil Rights Law Journal, 2016, v. 26, n. 2, p. 183
- Article
37
- American University Journal of Gender, Social Policy & the Law, 2013, v. 21, n. 3, p. 681
- Article
38
- American University Journal of Gender, Social Policy & the Law, 2011, v. 20, n. 1, p. 273
- Article
39
- Villanova Law Review, 2021, v. 66, n. 6, p. 53
- Article
40
- Michigan Law Review, 2010, v. 109, n. 2, p. 221
- Article
41
- Judges Forum Review / Revista Forumul Judecătorilor, 2022, n. 2, p. 17
- Yacoub, Amin R.;
- Briggs, Becky
- Article
42
- Case Western Reserve Law Review, 2016, v. 67, n. 2, p. 379
- Article
43
- Harvard Law & Policy Review, 2020, v. 14, n. 2, p. 531
- Article
44
- Harvard Law & Policy Review, 2013, v. 7, n. 1, p. 31
- Article
45
- University of Cincinnati Law Review, 2015, v. 83, n. 4, p. 1423
- Article
46
- Quinnipiac Law Review, 2013, v. 31, n. 4, p. 713
- Article
47
- Penn State Law Review, 2020, v. 125, n. 1, p. 289
- Article
48
- Mercer Law Review, 2015, v. 67, n. 1, p. 107
- Article
49
- Mercer Law Review, 2015, v. 67, n. 1, p. 31
- Article
50
- Akron Law Review, 2019, v. 53, n. 3, p. 481
- Article