Works matching Right to bear arms
1
- Griffith Law Review, 2018, v. 27, n. 1, p. 51, doi. 10.1080/10383441.2018.1436879
- Article
2
- William & Mary Business Law Review, 2024, v. 15, n. 2, p. 369
- Article
3
- St. John's Law Review, 2003, v. 77, n. 1, p. 1
- Article
4
- St. John's Law Review, 2003, v. 77, n. 2, p. 345
- Article
5
- Harvard Journal of Law & Public Policy, 2020, v. 43, n. 2, p. 331
- Article
6
- Harvard Journal of Law & Public Policy, 2010, v. 33, n. 1, p. 185
- Article
7
- Jurimetrics: The Journal of Law, Science & Technology, 2021, v. 61, n. 2, p. 267
- Article
8
- Journal of the Early Republic, 2009, v. 29, n. 4, p. 585, doi. 10.1353/jer.0.0107
- Article
9
- Journal of Social History, 2020, v. 54, n. 2, p. 453, doi. 10.1093/jsh/shz029
- Article
10
- University of Pittsburgh Law Review, 2020, v. 82, n. 2, p. 381, doi. 10.5195/lawreview.2020.789
- Article
11
- Stanford Law Review, 2012, v. 64, n. 1, p. 1
- Article
12
- Stanford Law Review, 2009, v. 62, n. 1, p. 199
- Article
13
- Cuestiones Políticas, 2022, v. 40, n. 72, p. 264, doi. 10.46398/cuestpol.4072.14
- Akhtyrska, Nataliia M.;
- Kotiuk, Oleksandr I.;
- Sereda, Yurii M.
- Article
14
- Brigham Young University Law Review, 1998, v. 1998, n. 1, p. 137
- Article
15
- Indiana Law Journal, 2014, v. 89, n. 4, p. 1587
- Article
16
- Criminal Justice Ethics, 2001, v. 20, n. 1, p. 25, doi. 10.1080/0731129X.2001.9992096
- Article
17
- Annals of Economics & Finance, 2025, v. 26, n. 1, p. 281
- Article
18
- Journal of American Studies, 2019, v. 53, n. 4, p. 1024, doi. 10.1017/S0021875818000968
- Article
19
- Texas Review of Law & Politics, 2006, v. 11, n. 1, p. 191
- Article
22
- Minnesota Law Review, 2024, v. 108, n. 6, p. 3049
- Walsh, Megan;
- Cornell, Saul
- Article
23
- Minnesota Law Review, 2012, v. 96, n. 6, p. 2182
- Article
24
- Indiana Law Review, 2017, v. 50, n. 3, p. 943, doi. 10.18060/4806.1157
- Article
25
- Marquette Law Review, 2011, v. 95, n. 1, p. 359
- Article
26
- Cumberland Law Review, 2010, v. 41, n. 1, p. 161
- Article
27
- Publius: The Journal of Federalism, 2024, v. 54, n. 3, p. 534, doi. 10.1093/publius/pjae020
- Article
28
- Publius: The Journal of Federalism, 2003, v. 33, n. 3, p. 63, doi. 10.1093/oxfordjournals.pubjof.a005003
- Article
29
- Colonial Latin American Review, 2012, v. 21, n. 2, p. 239, doi. 10.1080/10609164.2012.695620
- Article
30
- Touro Law Review, 2012, v. 28, n. 3, p. 665
- Article
31
- Missouri Law Review, 2017, v. 82, n. 2, p. 595
- Article
32
- Duquesne Law Review, 2011, v. 49, n. 1, p. 97
- Article
34
- International & Comparative Law Review, 2021, v. 28, n. 2, p. 405
- Article
38
- Journal of American History, 1984, v. 71, n. 1, p. 22, doi. 10.2307/1899832
- Article
39
- Northwestern University Law Review, 2021, v. 116, n. 1, p. 35
- Article
40
- Florida Bar Journal, 2013, v. 87, n. 10, p. 48
- Article
41
- UCLA Law Review, 2009, v. 56, n. 5, p. 1443
- Article
42
- Alaska Law Review, 2016, v. 33, n. 1, p. 125
- Article
43
- Michigan Law Review, 2022, v. 120, n. 4, p. 581, doi. 10.36644/mlr.120.4.securing
- Article
44
- 2011
- Glantz, Leonard H.;
- Gostin, Lawrence O.
- Letter
45
- Law of the USA / Pravo SŠA, 2013, n. 1/2, p. 240
- Article
46
- Duke Law Journal, 2018, v. 67, n. 7, p. 1433
- RUBEN, ERIC;
- BLOCHER, JOSEPH
- Article
48
- Arizona State Law Journal, 2011, v. 43, n. 2, p. 447
- Article
49
- Arizona State Law Journal, 2011, v. 43, n. 1, p. 447
- Article
50
- Law & Contemporary Problems, 1986, v. 49, n. 1, p. 151, doi. 10.2307/1191615
- Article