Works matching Ricci v. DeStefano
2
- Harvard Journal of Law & Public Policy, 2010, v. 33, n. 1, p. 361
- Article
3
- ABA Journal of Labor & Employment Law, 2010, v. 25, n. 2, p. 199
- Article
4
- Southern Law Journal, 2011, v. 21, n. 1, p. 29
- Robinson, Robert K.;
- Nichols, Dave L.;
- Cousley, Sam
- Article
5
- Hamline Law Review, 2011, v. 34, n. 1, p. 27
- Article
6
- New York Law School Law Review, 2013, v. 57, n. 4, p. 865
- Article
7
- Lewis & Clark Law Review, 2012, v. 16, n. 2, p. 573
- Article
8
- Harvard Civil Rights-Civil Liberties Law Review, 2010, v. 45, n. 1, p. 147
- Article
9
- New Mexico Law Review, 2011, v. 41, n. 1, p. 295
- Article
10
- Denver University Law Review, 2015, v. 92, n. 5, p. 1121
- Article
11
- Illinois Public Employee Relations Report, 2010, v. 27, n. 1, p. 1
- Article
12
- Northwestern University Law Review, 2010, v. 104, n. 1, p. 411
- Article
13
- TIP: The Industrial-Organizational Psychologist, 2012, v. 49, n. 4, p. 73
- Gutman, Art;
- Dunleavy, Eric M.
- Article
14
- Public Personnel Management, 2013, v. 42, n. 1, p. 41, doi. 10.1177/0091026013484574
- Article
15
- Boston University Law Review, 2010, v. 90, n. 6, p. 2181
- Seiner, Joseph A.;
- Gutman, Benjamin N.
- Article
17
- University of Chicago Legal Forum, 2014, p. 19
- Article
18
- University of Arkansas at Little Rock Law Review, 2012, v. 35, n. 1, p. 113
- Article
19
- Cornell Law Review, 2016, v. 101, n. 5, p. 1115
- Article
20
- South Carolina Law Review, 2010, v. 61, n. 3, p. 577
- Article
21
- Cardozo Law Review, 2013, v. 34, n. 6, p. 2157
- Article
22
- Alabama Law Review, 2015, v. 66, n. 3, p. 653
- Article
23
- Alabama Law Review, 2012, v. 63, n. 5, p. 955
- Article
24
- Harvard Journal of Law & Gender, 2010, v. 33, n. 2, p. 581
- Article
25
- SAM Advanced Management Journal (Society for Advancement of Management), 2010, v. 75, n. 3, p. 11
- Muffler, Stephen C.;
- Cavico, Frank J.;
- Mujtaba, Bahaudin G.
- Article
26
- Michigan Law Review, 2010, v. 108, n. 8, p. 1341
- Article
27
- Berkeley Journal of Employment & Labor Law, 2018, v. 39, n. 1, p. 177, doi. 10.15779/Z389C6S14N
- Article
28
- Berkeley Journal of Employment & Labor Law, 2011, v. 32, n. 2, p. 347
- Article
29
- Berkeley Journal of Employment & Labor Law, 2010, v. 31, n. 2, p. 285
- Article
30
- Wake Forest Law Review, 2011, v. 46, n. 5, p. 1035
- Article
31
- Wake Forest Law Review, 2011, v. 46, n. 2, p. 261
- Article
32
- Wake Forest Law Review, 2011, v. 46, n. 2, p. 241
- Article
33
- California Law Review, 2011, v. 99, n. 4, p. 1083
- Article
34
- ABA Journal of Labor & Employment Law, 2010, v. 25, n. 2, p. 213
- Article
35
- Wisconsin Journal of Law, Gender & Society, 2012, v. 27, n. 2, p. 100
- Article
36
- Touro Law Review, 2010, v. 26, n. 2, p. 491
- Article
37
- Public Administration Review, 2010, v. 70, n. 4, p. 582, doi. 10.1111/j.1540-6210.2010.02179.x
- Article
38
- Iowa Law Review, 2011, v. 96, n. 3, p. 837
- Article
39
- Review of Public Personnel Administration, 2009, v. 29, n. 4, p. 402, doi. 10.1177/0734371X09349442
- Article
41
- Lewis & Clark Law Review, 2012, v. 16, n. 2, p. 409
- Article
42
- Brigham Young University Law Review, 2010, v. 2010, n. 4, p. 1257
- Article
43
- St. Louis University Public Law Review, 2012, v. 31, n. 2, p. 255
- Article
44
- Texas Review of Law & Politics, 2010, v. 14, n. 2, p. 385
- Article
46
- Wisconsin Law Review, 2014, v. 2014, n. 5, p. 937
- Article
47
- Public Personnel Management, 2013, v. 42, n. 2, p. 151, doi. 10.1177/0091026013487046
- Biddle, Richard E.;
- Biddle, Daniel A.
- Article
48
- Seton Hall Law Review, 2014, v. 44, n. 2, p. 556
- Article
49
- Law, Probability & Risk, 2009, v. 8, n. 2, p. 171, doi. 10.1093/lpr/mgp017
- GASTWIRTH, JOSEPH L.;
- WEIWEN MIAO
- Article
50
- Harvard Civil Rights-Civil Liberties Law Review, 2014, v. 49, n. 1, p. 125
- Article