Works matching Respondeat superior
1
- California Law Review, 1981, v. 69, n. 5, p. 1513, doi. 10.2307/3480251
- Article
2
- University of Toledo Law Review, 2024, v. 55, n. 2, p. 295
- Article
3
- University of Chicago Law Review, 2008, v. 75, n. 4, p. 1683
- Article
4
- Georgia Law Review, 2016, v. 50, n. 4, p. 1233
- Alfano Jr., Michael David
- Article
5
- Contract Management, 2016, v. 56, n. 7, p. 18
- Article
6
- Wisconsin Law Review, 2012, v. 2012, n. 5, p. 1215
- Article
8
- Criminal Law & Philosophy, 2024, v. 18, n. 1, p. 89, doi. 10.1007/s11572-023-09659-7
- Article
9
- Philosophical Studies, 2024, v. 181, n. 9, p. 2219, doi. 10.1007/s11098-023-02077-4
- Article
10
- Baylor University Medical Center Proceedings, 2010, v. 23, n. 3, p. 313, doi. 10.1080/08998280.2010.11928641
- Article
11
- University of Cincinnati Law Review, 2018, v. 86, n. 2, p. 483
- Article
12
- Arizona State Law Journal, 2021, v. 53, n. 1, p. 199
- Article
13
- Mitchell Hamline Law Review, 2020, v. 46, n. 5, p. 1043
- Article
14
- New York University Journal of Legislation & Public Policy, 2023, v. 25, n. 2, p. 387
- Article
15
- Applied Research in Coaching & Athletics Annual, 2011, v. 26, p. 1
- Baker III, Thomas A.;
- Connaughton, Daniel P.;
- Zhang, James I.
- Article
16
- Washington University Global Studies Law Review, 2019, v. 18, n. 1, p. 161
- Article
17
- Washburn Law Journal, 2016, v. 55, n. 3, p. 637
- Article
18
- Washburn Law Journal, 2016, v. 55, n. 3, p. 7
- Article
19
- Michigan Law Review, 2011, v. 109, n. 4, p. 657
- Article
20
- University of Louisville Law Review, 2014, v. 53, n. 1, p. 143
- Article
21
- Yale Journal of Law & the Humanities, 2014, v. 26, n. 1, p. 135
- Article
22
- Labor Law Journal, 2019, v. 70, n. 3, p. 165
- Conklin, Michael;
- Goebel, Julia
- Article
23
- Ethics & Critical Thinking Journal, 2012, v. 2012, n. 1, p. 38
- Article
24
- University of Colorado Law Review, 2015, v. 86, n. 4, p. 1141
- Article
25
- Georgia Law Review, 2017, v. 51, n. 3, p. 879
- Article
26
- Notre Dame Journal of Law, Ethics & Public Policy, 2014, v. 28, n. 2, p. 525
- GALLO, JOHN N.;
- GREENFIELD, DANIEL M.
- Article
27
- American Journal of Law & Medicine, 1993, v. 19, n. 4, p. 554
- Article
28
- Mitchell Hamline Law Review, 2022, v. 48, n. 2, p. 467
- Article
29
- Mercer Law Review, 2016, v. 67, n. 4, p. 789
- Article
30
- Mercer Law Review, 2010, v. 62, n. 1, p. 317
- Hicks, Deron H.;
- Hargrove, Travis C.
- Article
31
- Nursing Economic$, 1987, v. 5, n. 6, p. 311
- Article
32
- Tennessee Bar Journal, 2017, v. 53, n. 4, p. 12
- Article
33
- Counselor Education & Supervision, 1999, v. 38, n. 4, p. 269, doi. 10.1002/j.1556-6978.1999.tb00577.x
- Guest Jr., Charles L.;
- Dooley, Katherine
- Article
34
- Journal of Personal Selling & Sales Management, 2000, v. 20, n. 4, p. 263, doi. 10.1080/08853134.2000.10754246
- Spain, Judith;
- Ramsey, Rosemary
- Article
35
- Management Review, 1998, v. 87, n. 4, p. 7
- Article
36
- Transportation Law Journal, 2015, v. 42, n. 1, p. 147
- Article
37
- Edinburgh Law Review, 2024, v. 28, n. 2, p. 207, doi. 10.3366/elr.2024.0893
- Article
38
- Edinburgh Law Review, 2024, v. 28, n. 2, p. 174, doi. 10.3366/elr.2024.0892
- Campbell, Mat;
- Lindsay, Bobby
- Article
40
- Edinburgh Law Review, 2020, v. 24, n. 3, p. 389, doi. 10.3366/elr.2020.0651
- Article
41
- Edinburgh Law Review, 2018, v. 22, n. 2, p. 294, doi. 10.3366/elr.2018.0489
- Article
42
- Edinburgh Law Review, 2016, v. 20, n. 2, p. 211, doi. 10.3366/elr.2016.0343
- Article
43
- Actualidad Jurídica (1578-956X), 2013, n. 35, p. 54
- GRÁVALOS OLIVELLA, JAVIER
- Article
44
- New York University Law Review, 2024, v. 99, n. 2, p. 578
- Article
45
- New York University Law Review, 2014, v. 89, n. 3, p. 885
- Article
46
- Duke Law Journal, 2014, v. 63, n. 7, p. 1543
- Article
47
- Southwestern Law Review, 2012, v. 41, n. 3, p. 331
- Article
48
- Journal of Health & Biomedical Law, 2016, v. 11, n. 3, p. 521
- Article
49
- Arbitration Journal, 1990, v. 45, n. 4, p. 63
- Article
50
- Denning Law Journal, 2020, v. 32, n. 1, p. 25
- Article