Works matching Proliferation Security Initiative (PSI)
1
- Korean Journal of Defense Analysis, 2004, v. 16, n. 2, p. 109, doi. 10.1080/10163270409464067
- Article
2
- DISAM Journal of International Security Assistance Management, 2008, v. 30, n. 3, p. 40
- Article
3
- Ocean Development & International Law, 2012, v. 43, n. 1, p. 96, doi. 10.1080/00908320.2012.647515
- Article
4
- Ocean Development & International Law, 2007, v. 38, n. 1/2, p. 101, doi. 10.1080/00908320601071421
- Article
5
- Journal of East Asia & International Law, 2010, v. 3, n. 1, p. 49
- Article
6
- Houston Journal of International Law, 2006, v. 28, n. 3, p. 771
- Article
7
- Korean Journal of Defense Analysis, 2010, v. 22, n. 1, p. 15, doi. 10.1080/10163270903522812
- Article
8
- Korean Journal of Defense Analysis, 2005, v. 17, n. 1, p. 105, doi. 10.1080/10163270509464076
- Article
9
- Korean Journal of Defense Analysis, 2004, v. 16, n. 1, p. 25, doi. 10.1080/10163270409464054
- Article
10
- Contemporary Security Policy, 2009, v. 30, n. 2, p. 375, doi. 10.1080/13523260903077387
- Article
11
- Journal of Conflict & Security Law, 2007, v. 12, n. 1, p. 1, doi. 10.1093/jcsl/krm001
- Article
12
- Journal of Conflict & Security Law, 2005, v. 10, n. 2, p. 125, doi. 10.1093/jcsl/kri007
- Article
13
- Ocean & Coastal Law Journal, 2020, v. 25, n. 1, p. 131
- Article
15
- Comparative Strategy, 2009, v. 28, n. 5, p. 395, doi. 10.1080/01495930903341210
- Article
16
- Comparative Strategy, 2004, v. 23, n. 2, p. 213, doi. 10.1080/01495930490444653
- Article
17
- Chinese Journal of International Politics, 2016, v. 9, n. 1, p. 81, doi. 10.1093/cjip/pov013
- Onderco, Michal;
- van Hooft, Paul
- Article
18
- Temple International & Comparative Law Journal, 2018, v. 32, n. 2, p. 147
- Hollis, Duncan B.;
- Waxman, Matthew C.
- Article
19
- Ocean Development & International Law, 2006, v. 37, n. 1, p. 33, doi. 10.1080/00908320500474023
- Article
20
- Ocean Development & International Law, 2005, v. 36, n. 4, p. 381, doi. 10.1080/00908320500308833
- Article
21
- Strategic Studies, 2012, v. 32, n. 2/3, p. 212
- Article
22
- Strategic Analysis, 2009, v. 33, n. 5, p. 686, doi. 10.1080/09700160903064513
- Article
23
- Chinese Journal of International Law, 2009, v. 8, n. 3, p. 657, doi. 10.1093/chinesejil/jmp027
- Article
24
- New Zealand International Review, 2008, v. 33, n. 2, p. 12
- Article
25
- Bulletin of the Atomic Scientists, 2007, v. 63, n. 3, p. 21, doi. 10.2968/063003005
- Article
26
- Bulletin of the Atomic Scientists, 2005, v. 61, n. 6, p. 24, doi. 10.2968/061006009
- Article
28
- Washington Quarterly, 2005, v. 28, n. 2, p. 129, doi. 10.1162/0163660053295211
- Article
29
- Asian Perspective, 2009, v. 33, n. 3, p. 107, doi. 10.1353/apr.2009.0012
- Article
30
- Defense & Security Analysis, 2007, v. 23, n. 3, p. 281, doi. 10.1080/14751790701573881
- Holmes, James R.;
- Winner, Andrew C.
- Article
31
- Jebat: Malaysian Journal of History, Politics & Strategy, 2024, v. 51, n. 3, p. 273, doi. 10.17576/jebat.2024.5103.02
- PERMAL, SUMATHY;
- MOORTHY, RAVICHANDRAN
- Article
32
- Southeast Review of Asian Studies, 2007, v. 29, p. 104
- Article