Works matching Probable cause (Searches %26 seizures)
1
- Michigan Law Review, 2015, v. 113, n. 4, p. 461
- Article
2
- Vanderbilt Law Review, 2017, v. 70, n. 6, p. 1249
- Article
3
- Vanderbilt Law Review, 2017, v. 70, n. 4, p. 1249
- Article
4
- Bench & Bar of Minnesota, 2013, v. 70, n. 5, p. 46
- Article
5
- New England Law Review, 2012, v. 46, n. 4, p. 877
- Article
6
- Michigan Law Review, 2019, v. 118, n. 3, p. 507, doi. 10.36644/mlr.118.3.forensic
- Article
7
- Michigan Law Review, 2016, v. 115, n. 3, p. 307
- Article
8
- Michigan Law Review, 2016, v. 115, n. 1, p. 109
- Article
9
- Texas Journal on Civil Liberties & Civil Rights, 2015, v. 21, n. 1, p. 35
- Article
10
- Emory Law Journal, 2024, v. 73, n. 3, p. 589
- Article
11
- Emory Law Journal, 2020, v. 70, n. 1, p. 153
- Article
12
- Kansas Law Review, 2014, v. 62, p. 53
- Article
13
- Valparaiso University Law Review, 2018, v. 52, n. 2, p. 231
- Article
14
- Southern Illinois University Law Journal, 2012, v. 37, n. 1, p. 135
- Article
15
- William & Mary Law Review, 2024, v. 65, n. 6, p. 1349
- Article
16
- Denver Law Review, 2018, v. 95, n. 2, p. 519
- Article
17
- Washburn Law Journal, 2019, v. 58, n. 3, p. 769
- Article
18
- North Carolina Law Review, 2021, v. 99, n. 2, p. 379
- RAVENELL, TERESSA;
- ROSS III, RILEY H.
- Article
19
- Creighton Law Review, 2024, v. 57, n. 2, p. 391
- Article
20
- Creighton Law Review, 2024, v. 57, n. 1, p. 91
- Article
21
- Creighton Law Review, 2023, v. 57, n. 1, p. 91
- Article
22
- Creighton Law Review, 2021, v. 54, n. 2, p. 323
- Article
23
- New York University Law Review, 2014, v. 89, n. 4, p. 1522
- Article
24
- Law, Probability & Risk, 2012, v. 11, n. 2/3, p. 135, doi. 10.1093/lpr/mgs004
- Article
25
- George Washington Law Review, 2020, v. 88, n. 2, p. 269
- Article
26
- Urban Lawyer, 2013, v. 45, n. 4, p. 1017
- Article
27
- Urban Lawyer, 2013, v. 45, n. 2, p. 500
- Article
28
- Case Western Reserve Law Review, 2016, v. 66, n. 4, p. 1039
- Article
29
- University of Florida Journal of Law & Public Policy, 2013, v. 24, n. 3, p. 413
- Article
30
- Cato Supreme Court Review, 2023, p. 181
- Bidwell, Anya;
- Jaicomo, Patrick
- Article
31
- UMKC Law Review, 2014, v. 82, n. 3, p. 663
- Article
32
- Southern California Law Review, 2017, v. 90, n. 2, p. 307
- Article
33
- University of Michigan Journal of Law Reform, 2019, v. 52, n. 4, p. 615, doi. 10.36646/mjlr.52.3.quantum
- Article
34
- University of Miami Law Review, 2011, v. 65, n. 4, p. 1159
- Article
35
- Cardozo Arts & Entertainment Law Journal, 2021, v. 39, n. 3, p. 1061
- Article
36
- Marquette Law Review, 2016, v. 100, n. 1, p. 231
- Article
37
- Pace Law Review, 2016, v. 36, n. 3, p. 970, doi. 10.58948/2331-3528.1931
- Article
38
- Ottawa Law Review, 2015, v. 47, n. 1, p. 223
- Article
39
- Loyola Law Review, 2016, v. 62, n. 1, p. 25
- Garner, James M.;
- Bludworth, Darnell;
- Curtis, Martha Y.
- Article
40
- Gonzaga Law Review, 2012, v. 48, n. 2, p. 431
- Article
41
- Bench & Bar of Minnesota, 2021, v. 78, n. 7, p. 36
- Article
42
- Minnesota Law Review, 2020, v. 104, n. 3, p. 1275
- Article
43
- California Western Law Review, 2016, v. 53, n. 1, p. 85
- Article
44
- Journal of Empirical Legal Studies, 2011, v. 8, p. 72, doi. 10.1111/j.1740-1461.2011.01230.x
- Rachlinski, Jeffrey J.;
- Guthrie, Chris;
- Wistrich, Andrew J.
- Article
45
- George Washington Law Review Arguendo, 2017, v. 85, n. 5, p. 1554
- Article
46
- Touro Law Review, 2020, v. 36, n. 2, p. 663
- Article
47
- Touro Law Review, 2017, v. 33, n. 3, p. 1123
- Article
48
- Touro Law Review, 2016, v. 32, n. 4, p. 807
- Article
49
- Touro Law Review, 2013, v. 29, n. 4, p. 1115
- Article
50
- Loyola of Los Angeles Law Review, 2012, v. 45, n. 3, p. 985
- Article