Works matching Peer review

Results: 5000

Peer-Review in der Wissenschaft - eine Analyse des Begutachtungsverfahrens aus der Sicht wissenschaftssoziologischer Theorien.

Published in:

Swiss Journal of Sociology / Schweizerische Zeitschrift für Soziologie, 2007, v. 33, n. 2, p. 327

By:

Bornmann, Lutz

Publication type:

Article

Peer review, feedback e nuovi modelli di valutazione partecipata nell'higher education: una sperimentazione presso l'Università Mediterranea di Reggio Calabria.

Published in:

Education Sciences & Society, 2021, v. 12, n. 2, p. 250, doi. 10.3280/ess2-2021oa12477

By:

Vinci, Viviana

Publication type:

Article

The BMIF Journal's Online Peer Review System.

Published in:

Petroleum - Gas University of Ploiesti Bulletin, Mathematics - Informatics - Physics Series, 2010, v. 62, n. 2, p. 126

By:

Constantinescu, Zoran;
Vlădoiu, Monica

Publication type:

Article

What is Peer Review, and Does it Have a Future?

Published in:

Bibliothek Forschung und Praxis, 2015, v. 39, n. 2, p. 200, doi. 10.1515/bfp-2015-0024

By:

Sowards, Steven W.

Publication type:

Article

Effect of online peer review versus face-to-Face peer review on argumentative writing achievement of EFL learners.

Published in:

Computer Assisted Language Learning, 2023, v. 36, n. 1/2, p. 238, doi. 10.1080/09588221.2021.1912104

By:

Awada, Ghada M.;
Diab, Nuwar Mawlawi

Publication type:

Article

Variability in students' evaluating processes in peer assessment with calibrated peer review.

Published in:

Journal of Computer Assisted Learning, 2017, v. 33, n. 2, p. 178, doi. 10.1111/jcal.12176

By:

Russell, J.;
Van Horne, S.;
Ward, A.S.;
Bettis, E.A.;
Gikonyo, J.

Publication type:

Article

UNDERGRADUATE ACADEMIC WRITING INSTRUCTION THROUGH PEER-REVIEW WORKSHOPS: A CASE STUDY IN ROMANIAN HIGHER EDUCATION.

Published in:

Studii de Ştiintă şi Cultură, 2024, v. 20, n. 4, p. 152

By:

MANDICI, Mădălina Elena

Publication type:

Article

The role of the anonymous voice in post -publication peer review versus traditional peer review.

Published in:

KOME, An International Journal of Pure Communication Inquiry, 2015, v. 3, n. 2, p. 90, doi. 10.17646/KOME.2015.27

By:

da Silva, Jaime A. Teixeira;
Dobránszki, Judit

Publication type:

Article

Open Peer Review for Evaluating Academic Legal Publications: The "Antidote" to an "Ill" Blind Peer Review?

Published in:

Tilburg Law Review, 2018, v. 23, n. 1/2, p. 77, doi. 10.5334/tilr.128

By:

Garrido-Gallego, Yeimy

Publication type:

Article

Cascading peer review for open-access publishing.

Published in:

2013

By:

Barroga, Edward F.

Publication type:

Essay

A new scholar's perspective on open peer review.

Published in:

Teaching in Higher Education, 2015, v. 20, n. 8, p. 857, doi. 10.1080/13562517.2015.1085857

By:

Bali, Maha

Publication type:

Article

Interactive open access publishing and public peer review: The effectiveness of transparency and self-regulation in scientific quality assurance.

Published in:

Atmospheric Chemistry & Physics, 2010, v. 10, n. 17, p. 40

By:

Pöschl, Ulrich

Publication type:

Article

Peer review as a strategy for improving students’ writing process.

Published in:

Active Learning in Higher Education, 2016, v. 17, n. 3, p. 179, doi. 10.1177/1469787416654794

By:

Baker, Kimberly M.

Publication type:

Article

Expanding the Paediatric Urology Peer Review Pipeline: A Novel Panel and Facilitated Peer Mentorship Program.

Published in:

Learned Publishing, 2025, v. 38, n. 2, p. 1, doi. 10.1002/leap.1664

By:

Ernst, Michael;
Jaeger, Christopher;
Nelson, Caleb P.;
Tanaka, Stacy;
Regala, Jennifer;
Ching, Christina

Publication type:

Article

Adapting peer review for the future: Digital disruptions and trust in peer review.

Published in:

Learned Publishing, 2024, v. 37, n. 1, p. 49, doi. 10.1002/leap.1594

By:

Calamur, Harini;
Ghosh, Roohi

Publication type:

Article

Purposes of peer review: A qualitative study of stakeholder expectations and perceptions.

Published in:

Learned Publishing, 2021, v. 34, n. 2, p. 144, doi. 10.1002/leap.1336

By:

Severin, Anna;
Chataway, Joanna

Publication type:

Article

Peer Review as a Professional Obligation: Steps and Tips to Becoming a High-Quality Reviewer.

Published in:

Journal of Pediatric Pharmacology & Therapeutics, 2024, v. 29, n. 6, p. 570, doi. 10.5863/1551-6776-29.6.570

By:

Johnson, Peter N.;
Miller, Jamie L.

Publication type:

Article

The Dedisciplining of Peer Review.

Published in:

2012

By:

Frodeman, Robert;
Briggle, Adam

Publication type:

Essay

Assessing peer review pattern and the effect of face-to-face and mobile-mediated modes on students' academic writing development.

Published in:

Language Testing in Asia, 2019, v. 9, n. 1, p. N.PAG, doi. 10.1186/s40468-019-0094-7

By:

Farahani, Ali Akbar Khomeijani;
Nemati, Majid;
Nazari Montazer, Mostafa

Publication type:

Article

Improving peer review: What reviewers can do.

Published in:

American Journal of Health-System Pharmacy, 2017, v. 74, n. 4, p. 2080, doi. 10.2146/ajhp170190

By:

DiDomenico, Robert J.;
Baker, William L.;
Haines, Stuart T.

Publication type:

Article

Peer Review: Recent Experience and Future Directions.

Published in:

New Review of Information Networking, 2011, v. 16, n. 1, p. 23, doi. 10.1080/13614576.2011.566812

By:

Ware, Mark

Publication type:

Article

Gender differences in students' argumentative essay writing, peer review performance and uptake in online learning environments.

Published in:

Interactive Learning Environments, 2023, v. 31, n. 10, p. 6302, doi. 10.1080/10494820.2022.2034887

By:

Noroozi, Omid;
Banihashem, Seyyed Kazem;
Taghizadeh Kerman, Nafiseh;
Parvaneh Akhteh Khaneh, Marzieh;
Babayi, Maryam;
Ashrafi, Hadis;
Biemans, Harm J.A.

Publication type:

Article

'Oh-oh ... I'm under review!!!' Sessional university teaching and peer review.

Published in:

Journal of Practice Teaching & Learning, 2011, v. 11, n. 1, p. 75, doi. 10.1921/175951511X651904

By:

Sivertsen, Nina

Publication type:

Article

Discovering the Benefits of Group Peer Review of Submitted Manuscripts.

Published in:

Teaching & Learning in Medicine, 2020, v. 32, n. 1, p. 104, doi. 10.1080/10401334.2019.1657870

By:

Richards, Boyd F.;
Cardell, Elizabeth M.;
Chow, Candace J.;
Moore, Kathryn B.;
Moorman, Krystal L.;
O'Connor, Meghan;
Hart, Sara E.

Publication type:

Article

Peer Review Quality and Transparency of the Peer-Review Process in Open Access and Subscription Journals.

Published in:

PLoS ONE, 2016, v. 11, n. 1, p. 1, doi. 10.1371/journal.pone.0147913

By:

Wicherts, Jelte M.

Publication type:

Article

Toxicologic Pathology Forum*: Opinion on Considerations for the Use of Whole Slide Images in GLP Pathology Peer Review.

Published in:

Toxicologic Pathology, 2019, v. 47, n. 2, p. 100, doi. 10.1177/0192623318818790

By:

Bradley, Alys;
Jacobsen, Matt

Publication type:

Article

A descriptive analysis of the characteristics and the peer review process of systematic review protocols published in an open peer review journal from 2012 to 2017.

Published in:

2019

By:

Rombey, Tanja;
Allers, Katharina;
Mathes, Tim;
Hoffmann, Falk;
Pieper, Dawid

Publication type:

journal article

Writing knowledge: Wikipedia, public review, and peer review.

Published in:

Studies in Higher Education, 2020, v. 45, n. 5, p. 950, doi. 10.1080/03075079.2020.1749791

By:

Cummings, Robert E.

Publication type:

Article

Perceptions of the Peer Review Process in Hospitality and Tourism.

Published in:

Journal of Hospitality & Tourism Education, 2021, v. 33, n. 4, p. 288, doi. 10.1080/10963758.2020.1729771

By:

Deale, Cynthia S.;
Lee, Seung-Hyun;
Bae, Stephanie Jung-In

Publication type:

Article

Impact of author characteristics on outcomes of single- versus double-blind peer review: a systematic review of comparative studies in scientific abstracts and publications.

Published in:

Scientometrics, 2025, v. 130, n. 1, p. 399, doi. 10.1007/s11192-024-05213-x

By:

Giannakakos, Vasiliki P.;
Karanfilian, Troy S.;
Dimopoulos, Antonios D.;
Barmettler, Anne

Publication type:

Article

Peer review in the 21st century.

Published in:

Information Services & Use, 2017, v. 37, n. 3, p. 259, doi. 10.3233/ISU-170850

By:

Burley, Rachel

Publication type:

Article

Ten Tips for Performing Your First Peer Review: The Next Step for the Aspiring Academic Plastic Surgeon.

Published in:

Archives of Plastic Surgery, 2022, v. 49, n. 4, p. 538, doi. 10.1055/s-0042-1744413

By:

Frendø, Martin;
Frithioff, Andreas;
Andersen, Steven Arild Wuyts

Publication type:

Article

Redefining the Practice of Peer Review Through Intelligent Automation Part 2: Data-Driven Peer Review Selection and Assignment.

Published in:

Journal of Digital Imaging, 2017, v. 30, n. 6, p. 657, doi. 10.1007/s10278-017-0005-3

By:

Reiner, Bruce

Publication type:

Article

Multi-stage open peer review: scientific evaluation integrating the strengths of traditional peer review with the virtues of transparency and self-regulation.

Published in:

Frontiers in Computational Neuroscience, 2012, v. 6, p. 1, doi. 10.3389/fncom.2012.00033

By:

Pöschl, Ulrich

Publication type:

Article

Open Science: A Review on Open Peer Review Literature.

Published in:

Library Philosophy & Practice, 2018, p. 1

By:

Hodonu-Wusu, James Oluwaseyi

Publication type:

Article

Is expert peer review obsolete? A model suggests that post-publication reader review may exceed the accuracy of traditional peer review.

Published in:

Surgical Endoscopy & Other Interventional Techniques, 2012, v. 26, n. 8, p. 2275, doi. 10.1007/s00464-012-2171-1

By:

Herron, Daniel

Publication type:

Article

Construction Project Peer Reviews as an Early Indicator of Project Success.

Published in:

Journal of Management in Engineering, 2013, v. 29, n. 4, p. 327, doi. 10.1061/(ASCE)ME.1943-5479.0000149

By:

Molenaar, Keith R.;
Javernick-Will, Amy;
Bastias, Alfonso G.;
Wardwell, Meredith A.;
Saller, Kevin

Publication type:

Article

Interactive Open Access Publishing and Peer Review: The Effectiveness and Perspectives of Transparency and Self-Regulation in Scientific Communication and Evaluation.

Published in:

Liber Quarterly: The Journal of European Research Libraries, 2010, v. 19, n. 3/4, p. 293, doi. 10.18352/lq.7967

By:

Pöschl, Ulrich

Publication type:

Article

Interactive open access publishing and public peer review: The effectiveness of transparency and self-regulation in scientific quality assurance.

Published in:

Atmospheric Chemistry & Physics Discussions, 2010, v. 10, n. 7, p. 40

By:

Pöschl, Ulrich

Publication type:

Article

Interactive Open Access Publishing and Peer Review: The Effectiveness and Perspectives of Transparency and Self-Regulation in Scientific Communication and Evaluation.

Published in:

Atmospheric Chemistry & Physics Discussions, 2010, v. 10, n. 2, p. 293

By:

Pöschl, Ulrich

Publication type:

Article

Interactive Open Access Publishing and Peer Review: The Effectiveness and Perspectives of Transparency and Self-Regulation in Scientific Communication and Evaluation.

Published in:

Atmospheric Chemistry & Physics Discussions, 2010, v. 10, n. 1, p. 293

By:

Põschl, Ulrich

Publication type:

Article

Peer Review and Scientific Publishing in Times of Web 2.0.

Published in:

Publishing Research Quarterly, 2014, v. 30, n. 1, p. 39, doi. 10.1007/s12109-014-9345-8

By:

Vesnic-Alujevic, Lucia

Publication type:

Article

Rejoinder to Ivari's (2016) Paper: "How to Improve the Quality of Peer Reviews? Three Suggestions for System-level Changes".

Published in:

Communications of the Association for Information Systems, 2016, v. 38, n. 1, p. 284

By:

Mora, Manuel

Publication type:

Article

Improving Student Feedback Quality: A Simple Model Using Peer Review and Feedback Rubrics.

Published in:

Journal of Medical Education & Curricular Development, 2020, p. 1, doi. 10.1177/2382120520936604

By:

Camarata, Troy;
Slieman, Tony A

Publication type:

Article

Improving Student Feedback Quality: A Simple Model Using Peer Review and Feedback Rubrics.

Published in:

Journal of Medical Education & Curricular Development, 2020, p. 1, doi. 10.1177/2382120520936604

By:

Camarata, Troy;
Slieman, Tony A

Publication type:

Article

Scientific Peer Review to Inform Regulatory Decision Making: Leadership Responsibilities and Cautions.

Published in:

Risk Analysis: An International Journal, 2006, v. 26, n. 1, p. 5, doi. 10.1111/j.1539-6924.2006.00727.x

By:

Patton, Dorothy E.;
Olin, Stephen S.

Publication type:

Article

Establishing Interrater Reliability Within the Advanced Practice Nurse Peer Review Process.

Published in:

Journal of Nursing Measurement, 2021, v. 29, n. 2, p. 227, doi. 10.1891/JNM-D-20-00015

By:

Colella, Joan;
Douglas, Claudia;
VanBuitenen, Nancy;
Galesi, Jodi;
Aroh, Dianne

Publication type:

Article

Review of the Ethics and Etiquettes of Time Management of Manuscript Peer Review.

Published in:

Journal of Academic Ethics, 2014, v. 12, n. 4, p. 333, doi. 10.1007/s10805-014-9220-4

By:

Kumar, Malhar

Publication type:

Article

Defining and Characterizing Open Peer Review: A Review of the Literature.

Published in:

Journal of Scholarly Publishing, 2013, v. 44, n. 4, p. 311, doi. 10.3138/jsp.44-4-001

By:

Ford, Emily

Publication type:

Article

The Church and Peer Review: Was 'Peer' Review Fairer, More Honest Then Than Now?

Published in:

Journal of Scholarly Publishing, 2012, v. 44, n. 1, p. 36, doi. 10.3138/jsp.44.1.36

By:

Gould, Thomas H. P.

Publication type:

Article