Partial-Birth Abortion Ban Act of 1997.
- Published in:
- Issues in Law & Medicine, 1998, v. 14, n. 1, p. 61
- Publication type:
- Article
Works matching Partial-Birth Abortion Ban Act
Results: 30
1
2
THE PARTIAL-BIRTH ABORTION BAN ACT OF 2003 AND THE COMMERCE CLAUSE.
- Published in:
- Constitutional Commentary, 2003, v. 20, n. 3, p. 441
- By:
- Publication type:
- Article
3
THE PARTIAL-BIRTH ABORTION BAN ACT OF 2003.
- Published in:
- Harvard Journal on Legislation, 2004, v. 41, n. 1, p. 501
- By:
- Publication type:
- Article
4
Consideration of the veto message on HR 1122, Partial Birth Abortion Ban Act.
- Published in:
- 1998
- By:
- Publication type:
- Speech
5
FAILED LESSONS OF HISTORY: THE PREDICTABLE SHORTCOMINGS OF THE PARTIAL-BIRTH ABORTION BAN ACT.
- Published in:
- University of Maryland Law Journal of Race, Religion, Gender & Class, 2006, v. 6, n. 1, p. 159
- By:
- Publication type:
- Article
6
Abortion: Supreme Court Upholds Partial-Birth Abortion Ban Act Against Facial Challenge - Gonzales v. Carhart.
- Published in:
- American Journal of Law & Medicine, 2007, v. 33, n. 2/3, p. 523
- By:
- Publication type:
- Article
7
THE CONSTITUTION, CONGRESS AND ABORTION.
- Published in:
- New York University Journal of Law & Liberty, 2017, v. 11, n. 1, p. 394
- By:
- Publication type:
- Article
8
SOME FORM OF PUNISHMENT: PENALIZING WOMEN FOR ABORTION.
- Published in:
- William & Mary Bill of Rights Journal, 2018, v. 26, n. 3, p. 735
- By:
- Publication type:
- Article
9
GONZALES V. CARHART: NO LIMITS TO WHAT CONGRESS MAY NOW "FIND.".
- Published in:
- University of Maryland Law Journal of Race, Religion, Gender & Class, 2008, v. 8, n. 1/2, p. 327
- By:
- Publication type:
- Article
10
DESTABILIZING DISCOURSES: BLOCKING AND EXPLOITING A NEW DISCOURSE AT WORK IN GONZALES V. CARHART.
- Published in:
- Virginia Law Review, 2008, v. 94, n. 6, p. 1451
- By:
- Publication type:
- Article
11
Regulating Abortion in the United States after Gonzales v Carhart.
- Published in:
- Modern Law Review, 2007, v. 70, n. 6, p. 979, doi. 10.1111/j.1468-2230.2007.00673.x
- By:
- Publication type:
- Article
12
FEDERALISM, ABORTION, AND THE ORIGINAL MEANING OF THE FOURTEENTH AMENDMENT ENFORCEMENT POWER: CAN CONGRESS BAN PARTIAL-BIRTH ABORTION AFTER CARHART?
- Published in:
- Texas Review of Law & Politics, 2008, v. 13, n. 1, p. 105
- By:
- Publication type:
- Article
13
DEFERENCE TO CONGRESSIONAL FACT-FINDING IN RIGHTS-ENFORCING AND RIGHTS-LIMITING LEGISLATION.
- Published in:
- New York University Law Review, 2013, v. 88, n. 3, p. 878
- By:
- Publication type:
- Article
14
Gonzales v. Carhart.
- Published in:
- Issues in Law & Medicine, 2007, v. 23, n. 1, p. 89
- By:
- Publication type:
- Article
15
Law and Ethics.
- Published in:
- Death Studies, 2004, v. 28, n. 8, p. 803, doi. 10.1080/07481180490514684
- By:
- Publication type:
- Article
16
Congress Ignores the Parameters of the Health Exception.
- Published in:
- Journal of Legal Medicine, 2006, v. 27, n. 1, p. 71, doi. 10.1080/01947640500533341
- By:
- Publication type:
- Article
17
Fetal Personhood and Access to Reproductive Rights: Power and Precarity in Post-Roe America.
- Published in:
- Journal of International Women's Studies, 2025, v. 27, n. 1, p. 1
- By:
- Publication type:
- Article
18
GONZALES V. CARHART: CONTINUING THE CLASS CRITIQUE OF THE REPRODUCTIVE RIGHTS DOCTRINE AND MOVEMENT.
- Published in:
- South Carolina Law Review, 2008, v. 59, n. 4, p. 827
- By:
- Publication type:
- Article
19
The Congressional Debate on Partial-Birth Abortion: Constitutional Gravitas and Moral Passion.
- Published in:
- British Journal of Political Science, 2008, v. 38, n. 3, p. 383, doi. 10.1017/S0007123408000203
- By:
- Publication type:
- Article
20
DOES CONGRESS HAVE THE CONSTITUTIONAL POWER TO PROHIBIT PARTIAL-BIRTH ABORTION?
- Published in:
- Harvard Journal on Legislation, 2005, v. 42, n. 2, p. 319
- By:
- Publication type:
- Article
21
Third judge strikes down federal partial-birth abortion ban.
- Published in:
- Contemporary OB/GYN, 2004, v. 49, n. 11, p. 26
- Publication type:
- Article
22
Capturing the Judiciary: Carhart and the Undue Burden Standard.
- Published in:
- Washington & Lee Law Review, 2010, v. 67, n. 3, p. 915
- By:
- Publication type:
- Article
23
Supreme Court Report 2006--2007: Closing of the Courthouse Doors?
- Published in:
- Urban Lawyer, 2007, v. 39, n. 4, p. 739
- By:
- Publication type:
- Article
24
FACING FACTS: THE NEW ERA OF ABORTION CONFLICT AFTER WHOLE WOMAN'S HEALTH.
- Published in:
- Wake Forest Law Review, 2017, v. 52, n. 5, p. 1231
- By:
- Publication type:
- Article
25
DANGEROUS TERRAIN: MAPPING THE FEMALE BODY IN GONZALES V. CARHART.
- Published in:
- Columbia Journal of Gender & Law, 2010, v. 19, n. 3, p. 649
- By:
- Publication type:
- Article
26
Abortion Politics.
- Published in:
- 2007
- By:
- Publication type:
- Editorial
27
Abortion senator to abortion president.
- Published in:
- 2008
- By:
- Publication type:
- Editorial
28
A Lack of Prudence.
- Published in:
- 2007
- By:
- Publication type:
- Editorial
29
Partial-Birth Abortion on Trial.
- Published in:
- Human Life Review, 2005, v. 31, n. 2, p. 87
- By:
- Publication type:
- Article
30
Protecting Women from Their Abortion Choices.
- Published in:
- Hastings Center Report, 2007, v. 37, n. 6, p. 13, doi. 10.1353/hcr.2007.0083
- By:
- Publication type:
- Article