Rehabilitation vs. risk: What predicts parole board decisions and rehabilitation authority recommendations?
- Published in:
- Punishment & Society, 2024, v. 26, n. 5, p. 769, doi. 10.1177/14624745231213859
- By:
- Publication type:
- Article
Works matching Parole boards
Results: 365
1
2
Applying DEMATEL to Investigate the Relationship Between Factors Affecting Parole Boards’ Decision-Making in Taiwan.
- Published in:
- Prison Journal, 2014, v. 94, n. 1, p. 118, doi. 10.1177/0032885513512096
- By:
- Publication type:
- Article
3
Parole Board Members' Views of Sex Offender Registration and Community Notification.
- Published in:
- American Journal of Criminal Justice, 2012, v. 37, n. 3, p. 413, doi. 10.1007/s12103-011-9119-1
- By:
- Publication type:
- Article
4
Discretionary Release Decisions of Actual and Mock Parole Board Members: Implications for Community Sentiment and Parole Decision-Making Research.
- Published in:
- Psychiatry, Psychology & Law, 2011, v. 18, n. 4, p. 498, doi. 10.1080/13218719.2011.625619
- By:
- Publication type:
- Article
5
ON 'DOMESTIC' LAW AND THE LAW OF HUMAN RIGHTS: OSBORN v THE PAROLE BOARD.
- Published in:
- King's Law Journal, 2014, v. 25, n. 2, p. 147, doi. 10.5235/09615768.25.2.147
- By:
- Publication type:
- Article
6
CONSTITUTIONALLY INCAPABLE: PAROLE BOARDS AS SENTENCING COURTS.
- Published in:
- SMU Law Review, 2019, v. 72, n. 4, p. 565
- By:
- Publication type:
- Article
7
Building Public Confidence in Parole Boards: Findings From a Four-Country Study.
- Published in:
- British Journal of Criminology, 2022, v. 62, n. 6, p. 1395, doi. 10.1093/bjc/azab097
- By:
- Publication type:
- Article
8
Parole Boards: Problems and Promise.
- Published in:
- Federal Sentencing Reporter (University of California Press), 2015, v. 28, n. 2, p. 79, doi. 10.1525/fsr.2015.28.2.79
- By:
- Publication type:
- Article
9
Victim Submissions to Parole Boards: The Agenda for Research.
- Published in:
- Trends & Issues in Crime & Criminal Justice, 2003, n. 251, p. 1
- By:
- Publication type:
- Article
10
Do Prisoners have a Right to Fairness before the Parole Board?
- Published in:
- Sydney Law Review, 2010, v. 32, n. 3, p. 437
- By:
- Publication type:
- Article
11
Preliminary Evidence of Adaptive Decision Making Techniques Used by Parole Board Members.
- Published in:
- International Journal of Forensic Mental Health, 2009, v. 8, n. 2, p. 97, doi. 10.1080/14999010903199258
- By:
- Publication type:
- Article
12
The religious conversion and race of a prisoner: Mock parole board members' decisions, perceptions, and emotions.
- Published in:
- Legal & Criminological Psychology, 2014, v. 19, n. 1, p. 104, doi. 10.1111/j.2044-8333.2012.02063.x
- By:
- Publication type:
- Article
13
Georgia Parole Board's Use of Electronic Monitoring With High Risk Offenders: Enhancing Community Safety and Offender Reintegration Through Greater Accountability.
- Published in:
- Journal of Offender Monitoring, 2001, v. 14, n. 3/4, p. 13
- By:
- Publication type:
- Article
14
Open Letter to the Alabama Board of Pardons and Paroles on Chris Revis.
- Published in:
- CounterPunch, 2021, p. 1
- By:
- Publication type:
- Article
15
On the Parole Board: Reflections on Crime, Punishment, Redemption, and Justice. By Frederic G. Reamer (Columbia University Press, 2017, 296 pp., Paperback, $30 USD).
- Published in:
- 2018
- By:
- Publication type:
- Book Review
16
On the Parole Board: Reflections on Crime, Punishment, Redemption, and Justice.
- Published in:
- International Journal of Social Welfare, 2018, v. 27, n. 1, p. 101, doi. 10.1111/ijsw.12300
- By:
- Publication type:
- Article
17
Weighing Words: The Impact of Non-victim Correspondence on Parole Board Decisions.
- Published in:
- JQ: Justice Quarterly, 2021, v. 38, n. 4, p. 678, doi. 10.1080/07418825.2019.1639790
- By:
- Publication type:
- Article
18
The Parole Board as 'functus officio': R (Dickins) v Parole Board [2021] EWHC 1166 (Admin).
- Published in:
- Journal of Criminal Law, 2021, v. 85, n. 5, p. 406, doi. 10.1177/00220183211034160
- By:
- Publication type:
- Article
19
Determining the Appropriate Test for Reviewing Parole Board Decisions: Browne (Aswad) v The Parole Board of England and Wales [2018] EWCA Civ 2024.
- Published in:
- Journal of Criminal Law, 2020, v. 84, n. 1, p. 90, doi. 10.1177/0022018320906229
- By:
- Publication type:
- Article
20
The 'Focal Concerns' of Parole Board Decision-Making: A Thematic Analysis.
- Published in:
- Current Issues in Criminal Justice, 2016, v. 27, n. 3, p. 285, doi. 10.1080/10345329.2016.12036047
- By:
- Publication type:
- Article
21
Philosophies and Decision Making in Parole Board Members.
- Published in:
- Prison Journal, 2020, v. 100, n. 5, p. 640, doi. 10.1177/0032885520956566
- By:
- Publication type:
- Article
22
How do parole board members in England and Wales construct decisions about whether to release perpetrators of intimate partner violence from prison?
- Published in:
- Criminal Behaviour & Mental Health, 2020, v. 30, n. 6, p. 350, doi. 10.1002/cbm.2183
- By:
- Publication type:
- Article
23
'A Fair Crack of the Whip': The Parole Board's Need for Speed: R (Woodhouse) v Parole Board [2025] EWHC 137 (Admin).
- Published in:
- Journal of Criminal Law, 2025, v. 89, n. 2, p. 117, doi. 10.1177/00220183251329311
- By:
- Publication type:
- Article
24
Allegations in the Supreme Court: The Rejection of a Binary Approach to Evidence: R (Pearce) v Parole Board & Secretary of State for Justice [2023] UKSC 13; [2023] AC 807.
- Published in:
- Journal of Criminal Law, 2023, v. 87, n. 5/6, p. 428, doi. 10.1177/00220183231212676
- By:
- Publication type:
- Article
25
Evidence Before the Parole Board: R (Bailey & Another) v Secretary of State for Justice [2023] EWHC 555 (Admin); [2023] WLR(D) 130.
- Published in:
- Journal of Criminal Law, 2023, v. 87, n. 4, p. 299, doi. 10.1177/00220183231197123
- By:
- Publication type:
- Article
26
The Cost of Open Conditions: R (Samuel) v Parole Board [2020] EWHC 42 (Admin).
- Published in:
- Journal of Criminal Law, 2020, v. 84, n. 3, p. 263, doi. 10.1177/0022018320920993
- By:
- Publication type:
- Article
27
An Allegation as Proof of a Crime: R (Delaney) v Parole Board [2019] EWHC 779 (Admin).
- Published in:
- Journal of Criminal Law, 2019, v. 83, n. 4, p. 304, doi. 10.1177/0022018319868329
- By:
- Publication type:
- Article
28
Managing the Risk of Living: Life Imprisonment, the Medical Gaze and the Construction of the Paroled Body.
- Published in:
- British Journal of Criminology, 2024, v. 64, n. 6, p. 1428, doi. 10.1093/bjc/azae017
- By:
- Publication type:
- Article
29
The effects of an apology's timing and type on parole board decision-making.
- Published in:
- Criminal Justice Studies, 2023, v. 36, n. 1, p. 83, doi. 10.1080/1478601X.2023.2182302
- By:
- Publication type:
- Article
30
FLOWERS V. BOARD OF PROBATION & PAROLE: THE PAROLEE'S CUJO, THE COMMONWEALTH COURT DETERMINES ASSAULTIVE BEHAVIOR INCLUDES AN ATTACK BY A DOG UNDER A PAROLEE'S CONTROL.
- Published in:
- Widener Law Journal, 2011, v. 20, n. 2, p. 615
- By:
- Publication type:
- Article
31
Parole Board Decision-Making using Adversarial Risk Analysis.
- Published in:
- American Statistician, 2024, v. 78, n. 3, p. 345, doi. 10.1080/00031305.2024.2303416
- By:
- Publication type:
- Article
32
Impartiality is a Fundamental and Legal Obligation of the Oklahoma Pardon and Parole Board.
- Published in:
- Journal of Prisoners on Prisons, 2023, v. 32, n. 2, p. 145, doi. 10.18192/jpp.v32i2.6858
- By:
- Publication type:
- Article
33
MONSTER UNDER THE BED: THE NIGHTMARE OF LEAVING JUVENILE LIFE SENTENCES UP TO THE PAROLE BOARD.
- Published in:
- South Dakota Law Review, 2019, v. 64, n. 1, p. 126
- By:
- Publication type:
- Article
34
Actor–observer asymmetry in perceptions of parole board release decisions.
- Published in:
- Psychiatry, Psychology & Law, 2021, v. 28, n. 5, p. 623, doi. 10.1080/13218719.2020.1821826
- By:
- Publication type:
- Article
35
Elucidating the Factors that Influence Parole Decision-Making and Violent Offenders’ Performance on Parole.
- Published in:
- Psychiatry, Psychology & Law, 2014, v. 21, n. 3, p. 385, doi. 10.1080/13218719.2013.818521
- By:
- Publication type:
- Article
36
Recalling Conditionally Released Prisoners in England and Wales.
- Published in:
- European Journal of Probation, 2012, v. 4, n. 1, p. 34, doi. 10.1177/206622031200400104
- By:
- Publication type:
- Article
37
Evaluating reentry programming in Pennsylvania’s Board of Probation & Parole: An assessment of offenders’ perceptions and recidivism outcomes.
- Published in:
- Journal of Offender Rehabilitation, 2016, v. 55, n. 6, p. 419, doi. 10.1080/10509674.2016.1194945
- By:
- Publication type:
- Article
38
Gaining insight, changing attitudes and managing ‘risk’: Parole release decisions for women convicted of violent crimes.
- Published in:
- Punishment & Society, 2011, v. 13, n. 2, p. 149, doi. 10.1177/1462474510394961
- By:
- Publication type:
- Article
39
PROVIDING A MEANINGFUL OPPORTUNITY FOR RELEASE: A PROPOSAL FOR IMPROVING WASHINGTON'S MILLER-FIX.
- Published in:
- Washington Law Review, 2020, v. 95, n. 2, p. 1053
- By:
- Publication type:
- Article
40
Factors influencing mock parole board members: the impact of an incarcerated person's race/ethnicity, conversion while in prison, and mental health status.
- Published in:
- Analyses of Social Issues & Public Policy, 2022, v. 22, n. 1, p. 286, doi. 10.1111/asap.12286
- By:
- Publication type:
- Article
41
The Truth Will Set You Free: Reflections on the Rhetoric of Insight, Responsibility, and Remorse for the Board of Parole Hearings.
- Published in:
- Reflections: A Journal of Public Rhetoric, Civic Writing & Service Learning, 2019, v. 19, n. 1, p. 79
- By:
- Publication type:
- Article
42
Evaluating the Effectiveness of the National Curriculum and Training Institute's 'Cognitive Life Skills' Program among Parolees Supervised by Pennsylvania's Board of Probation & Parole.
- Published in:
- American Journal of Criminal Justice, 2017, v. 42, n. 3, p. 514, doi. 10.1007/s12103-016-9366-2
- By:
- Publication type:
- Article
43
Improving Parole Release in America.
- Published in:
- Federal Sentencing Reporter (University of California Press), 2015, v. 28, n. 2, p. 96, doi. 10.1525/fsr.2015.28.2.96
- By:
- Publication type:
- Article
44
How should inmates be released from prison? An assessment of parole versus fixed-sentence regimes*.
- Published in:
- Quarterly Journal of Economics, 2013, v. 128, n. 1, p. 371, doi. 10.1093/qje/qjs052
- By:
- Publication type:
- Article
45
THE CREATION OF THE DEPARTMENT OF PUBLIC WELFARE IN 1917; AND OF THE NEW PAROLE BOARD IN 1927.
- Published in:
- Journal of the American Institute of Criminal Law & Criminology, 1928, v. 19, p. 57
- Publication type:
- Article
46
THE FUNCTION OF THE BOARD OF PAROLES.
- Published in:
- Journal of the American Institute of Criminal Law & Criminology, 1928, v. 19, p. 11
- Publication type:
- Article
47
Rules of the Advisory Board in the Matter of Paroles in Maine.
- Published in:
- Journal of the American Institute of Criminal Law & Criminology, 1913, v. 4, n. 4, p. 601
- By:
- Publication type:
- Article
48
CONVICTED PAROLE VIOLATORS: RESPECTING THE POWERS ALLOCATED TO THE LEGISLATIVE BRANCH: A Survey of Kerak v. Pennsylvania Board of Probation and Parole.
- Published in:
- Widener Commonwealth Law Review, 2018, v. 27, n. 2, p. 317
- By:
- Publication type:
- Article
49
Expert psychiatric reports for the Parole Board for England and Wales.
- Published in:
- BJPsych Advances, 2024, v. 30, n. 6, p. 368, doi. 10.1192/bja.2024.34
- By:
- Publication type:
- Article
50
Risk assessment among prisoners: a view from a Parole Board member.
- Published in:
- International Review of Psychiatry, 1997, v. 9, n. 2/3, p. 273, doi. 10.1080/09540269775493
- By:
- Publication type:
- Article