Works matching Parens patriae
1
- Journal of Law & the Biosciences, 2016, v. 3, n. 3, p. 576, doi. 10.1093/jlb/lsw039
- Article
3
- Harvard Journal of Law & Public Policy, 2021, v. 44, n. 1, p. 339
- Article
4
- SMU Law Review, 2016, v. 69, n. 4, p. 759
- Article
5
- University of Michigan Journal of Law Reform, 2012, v. 45, n. 3, p. 561, doi. 10.36646/mjlr.45.3.when
- Article
6
- University of Chicago Law Review, 2011, v. 78, n. 1, p. 345
- Article
7
- Archives of Criminology / Archiwum Kryminologii, 2022, v. 44, n. 2, p. 41, doi. 10.7420/AK2022.04
- Celinska, Katarzyna;
- Cheboubi, Amina
- Article
8
- North Carolina Law Review, 2023, v. 101, n. 5, p. 1427
- HARBACH, MEREDITH JOHNSON
- Article
9
- Houston Law Review, 2012, v. 49, n. 2, p. 291
- Koenig, Thomas H.;
- Rustad, Michael L.
- Article
10
- Washington Law Review, 2022, v. 97, n. 4, p. 871
- Article
11
- Washington Law Review, 2020, v. 95, n. 2, p. 619
- Article
12
- Washington Law Review, 2017, v. 92, n. 4, p. 1955
- Article
13
- Tennessee Law Review, 2021, v. 88, n. 2, p. 277
- Article
14
- Notre Dame Journal of Law, Ethics & Public Policy, 2019, v. 33, n. 1, p. 1
- Article
15
- Health Law & Policy, 2014, v. 7, n. 2, p. 1
- Article
16
- Loyola Law Review, 2018, v. 64, n. 1, p. 257
- Article
17
- University of Colorado Law Review, 2012, v. 83, n. 2, p. 549
- Article
18
- William & Mary Law Review, 2013, v. 54, n. 5, p. 1753
- Article
19
- New York University Journal of Law & Liberty, 2017, v. 11, n. 3, p. 1089
- Article
20
- Emory International Law Review, 2022, v. 36, n. 1, p. 201
- Article
21
- Australasian Canadian Studies, 1985, v. 3, p. 70
- Article
22
- Theory & Research in Education, 2010, v. 8, n. 2, p. 199, doi. 10.1177/1477878510368628
- Article
23
- Journal of Law & the Biosciences, 2015, v. 2, n. 2, p. 459, doi. 10.1093/jlb/lsv028
- Article
24
- Liverpool Law Review, 2019, v. 40, n. 3, p. 227, doi. 10.1007/s10991-019-09235-x
- Article
25
- McGill International Journal of Sustainable Development Law & Policy, 2016, v. 12, n. 1, p. 1
- Article
26
- Feminist Legal Studies, 2024, v. 32, n. 3, p. 331, doi. 10.1007/s10691-023-09539-4
- Article
27
- Family Court Review, 2016, v. 54, n. 3, p. 512, doi. 10.1111/fcre.12227
- Article
28
- Journal of Contemporary Legal Issues, 2007, v. 16, n. 1, p. 51
- Article
30
- UCLA Journal of Environmental Law & Policy, 2011, v. 29, n. 1, p. 45, doi. 10.5070/L5291019961
- Rustad, Michael L.;
- Koenig, Thomas H.
- Article
31
- Ecology Law Quarterly, 2010, v. 37, n. 2, p. 625
- Article
32
- University of Michigan Journal of Law Reform, 2019, v. 52, n. 4, p. 581
- Article
33
- Journal of Health Care Law & Policy, 2011, v. 14, n. 2, p. 331
- RUSTAD, MICHAEL L.;
- KOENIG, THOMAS H.
- Article
34
- American Business Law Journal, 1979, v. 16, n. 3, p. 249, doi. 10.1111/j.1744-1714.1979.tb00563.x
- Article
35
- New York University Journal of Legislation & Public Policy, 2013, v. 16, n. 1, p. 39
- Article
36
- Columbia Law Review, 2009, v. 109, n. 4, p. 798
- Article
37
- Journal of Ethics & Social Philosophy, 2025, v. 30, n. 3, p. 339, doi. 10.26556/jesp.v30i3.4023
- Article
38
- Juvenile & Family Court Journal, 2014, v. 65, n. 3, p. 1, doi. 10.1111/jfcj.12020
- Article
39
- Natural Resources Journal, 2019, v. 59, n. 1, p. 59
- Regalia, Joseph;
- Hall, Noah D.
- Article
40
- Natural Resources Journal, 2011, v. 51, n. 2, p. 189
- Article
41
- Widener Law Review, 2014, v. 20, n. 2, p. 209
- Article
42
- Washington University Global Studies Law Review, 2015, v. 14, n. 2, p. 317
- Article
43
- Canterbury Law Review, 2010, v. 16, p. 127
- Article
44
- Duquesne Law Review, 2012, v. 50, n. 2, p. 333
- Article
45
- University of Memphis Law Review, 2012, v. 42, n. 3, p. 831
- Article
46
- University of Illinois Law Review, 2011, v. 2011, n. 4, p. 1419
- Article
47
- Philosophy of Education Yearbook, 2008, p. 402
- Article
48
- Vanderbilt Law Review, 2013, v. 66, n. 4, p. 1309
- Article
49
- Virginia Law Review, 2015, v. 101, n. 7, p. 1855
- Burch, Elizabeth Chamblee
- Article
50
- Hofstra Law Review, 2015, v. 43, n. 4, p. 1003
- Article