Works matching Padilla v. Kentucky
1
- Tennessee Journal of Law & Policy, 2013, v. 9, n. 1, p. 45
- Article
2
- Washburn Law Journal, 2012, v. 51, n. 3, p. 767
- Article
3
- UCLA Law Review, 2011, v. 58, n. 6, p. 1461
- Article
4
- New York University Law Review, 2014, v. 89, n. 5, p. 1836
- Article
7
- UMKC Law Review, 2011, v. 79, n. 4, p. 925
- Article
8
- U.C. Davis Law Review, 2012, v. 46, n. 2, p. 701
- Article
9
- International Journal of Punishment & Sentencing, 2011, v. 7, n. 3, p. 77
- Article
10
- Journal of Law & Policy, 2012, v. 20, n. 2, p. 677
- Article
11
- Yale Law Journal, 2012, v. 121, n. 4, p. 944
- Article
12
- Loyola of Los Angeles Law Review, 2011, v. 44, n. 3, p. 1073
- Article
13
- Judges' Journal, 2011, v. 50, n. 1, p. 13
- Weller, Steven;
- Martin, John A.
- Article
14
- Northwestern University Law Review, 2012, v. 106, n. 1, p. 351
- Article
15
- Denver University Law Review, 2015, v. 92, n. 4, p. 835
- Article
16
- Boston College Journal of Law & Social Justice, 2012, v. 32, n. 1, p. 31
- Article
17
- St. Louis University Public Law Review, 2011, v. 30, n. 2, p. 169
- Article
18
- St. Louis University Public Law Review, 2011, v. 30, n. 2, p. 87
- Article
19
- St. Louis University Public Law Review, 2011, v. 30, n. 2, p. 61
- Article
20
- Georgia State University Law Review, 2012, v. 28, n. 3, p. 891
- Article
21
- North Dakota Law Review, 2011, v. 87, n. 1, p. 86
- Article
22
- Federal Sentencing Reporter (University of California Press), 2011, v. 24, n. 1, p. 66, doi. 10.1525/fsr.2011.24.1.66
- Article
23
- New England Law Review, 2011, v. 45, n. 2, p. 353
- Article
24
- New England Law Review, 2011, v. 45, n. 2, p. 305
- Article
25
- St. Louis University Public Law Review, 2011, v. 30, n. 2, p. 139
- Article
27
- Indiana Law Journal, 2019, v. 94, n. 3, p. 854
- Article
28
- Boston University Law Review, 2014, v. 94, n. 5, p. 1651
- Article
29
- University of Pennsylvania Journal of Constitutional Law, 2011, v. 13, n. 5, p. 1299
- Article
30
- Wisconsin Law Review, 2015, v. 2015, n. 2, p. 399
- Article
31
- California Law Review, 2013, v. 101, n. 3, p. 553
- Article
32
- UCLA Law Review, 2016, v. 63, n. 4, p. 1034
- Article
33
- UCLA Law Review, 2011, v. 58, n. 6, p. 1515
- Article
34
- UCLA Law Review, 2011, v. 58, n. 6, p. 1417
- Article
35
- UCLA Law Review, 2011, v. 58, n. 6, p. 1393
- Article
36
- Creighton Law Review, 2020, v. 53, n. 3, p. 509
- Article
37
- University of Florida Journal of Law & Public Policy, 2016, v. 27, n. 3, p. 329
- Article
39
- University of Miami Law Review, 2013, v. 67, n. 4, p. 795
- SHARPLESS, REBECCA;
- STANTON, ANDREW
- Article
40
- Cardozo Law Review, 2013, v. 34, n. 5, p. 1751
- Article
41
- Cardozo Law Review, 2011, v. 33, n. 2, p. 549
- Article
42
- Touro Law Review, 2018, v. 34, n. 3, p. 823
- Article
43
- Touro Law Review, 2013, v. 29, n. 4, p. 1487
- Article
44
- Touro Law Review, 2013, v. 29, n. 3, p. 545
- Article
45
- Touro Law Review, 2011, v. 27, n. 3, p. 747
- Article
46
- Temple Law Review, 2016, v. 88, n. 4, p. 869
- Article
47
- DePaul Law Review, 2014, v. 63, n. 4, p. 959
- Article
48
- Hofstra Law Review, 2013, v. 42, n. 1, p. 303
- Article
49
- Maryland Law Review, 2013, v. 72, n. 3, p. 844
- GARCÍA HERNÁNDEZ, CÉSAR CUAUHTÉMOC
- Article
50
- William & Mary Bill of Rights Journal, 2015, v. 23, n. 3, p. 675
- Article