Works matching Padilla v. Kentucky
1
- Tennessee Journal of Law & Policy, 2013, v. 9, n. 1, p. 45
- Article
2
- Boston College Journal of Law & Social Justice, 2012, v. 32, n. 1, p. 31
- Article
3
- UMKC Law Review, 2011, v. 79, n. 4, p. 925
- Article
4
- Northwestern University Law Review, 2012, v. 106, n. 1, p. 351
- Article
7
- St. Louis University Public Law Review, 2011, v. 30, n. 2, p. 169
- Article
8
- St. Louis University Public Law Review, 2011, v. 30, n. 2, p. 87
- Article
9
- St. Louis University Public Law Review, 2011, v. 30, n. 2, p. 61
- Article
10
- International Journal of Punishment & Sentencing, 2011, v. 7, n. 3, p. 77
- Article
11
- Loyola of Los Angeles Law Review, 2011, v. 44, n. 3, p. 1073
- Article
12
- Denver University Law Review, 2015, v. 92, n. 4, p. 835
- Article
13
- UCLA Law Review, 2011, v. 58, n. 6, p. 1461
- Article
14
- North Dakota Law Review, 2011, v. 87, n. 1, p. 86
- Article
15
- New York University Law Review, 2014, v. 89, n. 5, p. 1836
- Article
16
- Georgia State University Law Review, 2012, v. 28, n. 3, p. 891
- Article
17
- Yale Law Journal, 2012, v. 121, n. 4, p. 944
- Article
18
- Judges' Journal, 2011, v. 50, n. 1, p. 13
- Weller, Steven;
- Martin, John A.
- Article
19
- U.C. Davis Law Review, 2012, v. 46, n. 2, p. 701
- Article
20
- Washburn Law Journal, 2012, v. 51, n. 3, p. 767
- Article
21
- Journal of Law & Policy, 2012, v. 20, n. 2, p. 677
- Article
22
- Federal Sentencing Reporter (University of California Press), 2011, v. 24, n. 1, p. 66, doi. 10.1525/fsr.2011.24.1.66
- Article
23
- New England Law Review, 2011, v. 45, n. 2, p. 353
- Article
24
- New England Law Review, 2011, v. 45, n. 2, p. 305
- Article
25
- St. Louis University Public Law Review, 2011, v. 30, n. 2, p. 139
- Article
27
- Wisconsin Law Review, 2015, v. 2015, n. 2, p. 399
- Article
28
- Maryland Law Review, 2013, v. 72, n. 3, p. 844
- GARCÍA HERNÁNDEZ, CÉSAR CUAUHTÉMOC
- Article
29
- Notre Dame Journal of Law, Ethics & Public Policy, 2015, v. 29, n. 1, p. 231
- GAVOOR, ARAM A.;
- ORLOSKY, JUSTIN M.
- Article
30
- Boston University Law Review, 2014, v. 94, n. 5, p. 1651
- Article
31
- American Journal of Criminal Law, 2011, v. 39, n. 1, p. 53
- Article
33
- Fordham Urban Law Journal, 2022, v. 49, n. 2, p. 401
- Article
34
- Creighton Law Review, 2020, v. 53, n. 3, p. 509
- Article
35
- Harvard Civil Rights-Civil Liberties Law Review, 2013, v. 48, n. 2, p. 1
- Article
36
- Harvard Civil Rights-Civil Liberties Law Review, 2013, v. 48, n. 1, p. 1
- Article
37
- California Law Review, 2013, v. 101, n. 3, p. 553
- Article
38
- St. Louis University Public Law Review, 2011, v. 30, n. 2, p. 183
- Article
39
- St. Louis University Public Law Review, 2011, v. 30, n. 2, p. 79
- Article
40
- St. Louis University Public Law Review, 2011, v. 30, n. 2, p. 43
- Article
41
- St. Louis University Public Law Review, 2011, v. 30, n. 2, p. 11
- Sweeney, Maureen;
- Scholten, Hillary
- Article
42
- St. Louis University Public Law Review, 2011, v. 30, n. 2, p. 3
- Article
43
- Iowa Law Review, 2014, v. 99, n. 5, p. 2219
- Article
44
- Iowa Law Review, 2014, v. 99, n. 5, p. 2131
- Article
45
- Iowa Law Review, 2014, v. 99, n. 5, p. 2103
- Joy, Peter A.;
- Uphoff, Rodney J.
- Article
46
- Harvard Latino Law Review, 2016, v. 19, p. 1
- Article
47
- DePaul Law Review, 2014, v. 63, n. 4, p. 959
- Article
48
- Tulane Law Review, 2011, v. 86, n. 1, p. 219
- Article
49
- Washington & Lee Law Review, 2013, v. 70, n. 2, p. 1309
- Article
50
- Washington & Lee Law Review, 2013, v. 70, n. 2, p. 1133
- Article