Humor and Persuasion: The Effects of Laughter during US Supreme Court's Oral Arguments.
- Published in:
- Law & Policy, 2020, v. 42, n. 2, p. 162, doi. 10.1111/lapo.12145
- By:
- Publication type:
- Article
Works matching Oral argument (Supreme Court)
Results: 150
1
2
Supreme Court Hears Oral Arguments on Case Challenging the Affordable Care Act.
- Published in:
- Benefits Quarterly, 2021, v. 37, n. 1, p. 72
- Publication type:
- Article
3
Supreme Court Hears Oral Arguments on Arkansas PBM Law.
- Published in:
- Benefits Quarterly, 2021, v. 37, n. 1, p. 70
- Publication type:
- Article
4
U.S. Supreme Court Hears Oral Arguments in AEP v. Connecticut.
- Published in:
- CoatingsTech, 2011, v. 8, n. 6, p. 20
- Publication type:
- Article
5
Since you put it that way... Gender norms and interruptions at Supreme Court oral arguments.
- Published in:
- Social Science Quarterly (Wiley-Blackwell), 2024, v. 105, n. 3, p. 582, doi. 10.1111/ssqu.13377
- By:
- Publication type:
- Article
6
TO SWEAR OR NOT TO SWEAR: USING FOUL LANGUAGE DURING A SUPREME COURT ORAL ARGUMENT.
- Published in:
- Washington University Law Review, 2012, v. 90, n. 1, p. 279
- By:
- Publication type:
- Article
7
Beyond Mere Presence: Gender Norms in Oral Arguments at the U.S. Supreme Court.
- Published in:
- Political Research Quarterly, 2020, v. 73, n. 3, p. 596, doi. 10.1177/1065912919847001
- By:
- Publication type:
- Article
8
Voting Fluidity and Oral Argument on the U.S. Supreme Court.
- Published in:
- Political Research Quarterly, 2013, v. 66, n. 2, p. 429, doi. 10.1177/1065912912442111
- By:
- Publication type:
- Article
9
An All White Enterprise: How the Normalcy of White Privilege is Maintained in US Supreme Court Race-Conscious Admissions Oral Arguments.
- Published in:
- Thresholds in Education, 2017, v. 40, n. 1, p. 21
- By:
- Publication type:
- Article
10
GENDER DYNAMICS AND SUPREME COURT ORAL ARGUMENTS.
- Published in:
- Michigan State Law Review, 2017, v. 2017, n. 5, p. 1033
- By:
- Publication type:
- Article
11
THE FUNCTIONS OF ORAL ARGUMENT IN THE U.S. SUPREME COURT.
- Published in:
- Quarterly Journal of Speech, 1976, v. 62, n. 4, p. 410, doi. 10.1080/00335637609383355
- By:
- Publication type:
- Article
12
ORAL ARGUMENT BEFORE THE SUPREME COURT: MARSHALL v. DAVIS IN THE SCHOOL SEGREGATION CASES.
- Published in:
- Quarterly Journal of Speech, 1971, v. 57, n. 1, p. 32, doi. 10.1080/00335637109383039
- By:
- Publication type:
- Article
13
Gender, Ideology, and Dominance in Supreme Court Oral Arguments.
- Published in:
- Journal of Women, Politics & Policy, 2020, v. 41, n. 4, p. 393, doi. 10.1080/1554477X.2020.1738977
- By:
- Publication type:
- Article
14
JUSTICE, INTERRUPTED: THE EFFECT OF GENDER, IDEOLOGY, AND SENIORITY AT SUPREME COURT ORAL ARGUMENTS.
- Published in:
- Virginia Law Review, 2017, v. 103, n. 7, p. 1379
- By:
- Publication type:
- Article
15
DOES ORAL ARGUMENT IN THE U.S. SUPREME COURT REALLY MATTER?
- Published in:
- Connecticut Bar Journal, 2011, v. 85, n. 4, p. 323
- By:
- Publication type:
- Article
16
Humor in Supreme Court oral arguments.
- Published in:
- Humor: International Journal of Humor Research, 2022, v. 35, n. 2, p. 169, doi. 10.1515/humor-2020-0128
- By:
- Publication type:
- Article
17
Oral Arguments Before the United States Supreme Court in Stenberg v. Carhart.
- Published in:
- Issues in Law & Medicine, 2000, v. 16, n. 1, p. 69
- Publication type:
- Article
18
Oral arguments before the United States Supreme Court in Stenberg v. Carhart.
- Published in:
- 2000
- Publication type:
- Journal Article
19
Recent developments in health law. U.S. Supreme Court hears oral arguments in Ashcroft v. Raich background.
- Published in:
- 2005
- By:
- Publication type:
- Journal Article
20
I Can't See You; Can You Hear Me? Gender Norms and Context During In-Person and Teleconference U.S. Supreme Court Oral Arguments.
- Published in:
- Politics & Gender, 2024, v. 20, n. 2, p. 318, doi. 10.1017/S1743923X23000594
- By:
- Publication type:
- Article
21
Supreme Court Hears Oral Argument in a Consumer Case.
- Published in:
- Dispute Resolution Journal, 2011, v. 66, n. 3, p. 4
- Publication type:
- Article
22
Supreme Court Hears Oral Arguments in FNHRA Violations Case.
- Published in:
- Benefits Quarterly, 2023, v. 39, n. 2, p. 42
- Publication type:
- Article
23
Supreme Court Hears Oral Arguments in Wal-Mart v. Dukes.
- Published in:
- TIP: The Industrial-Organizational Psychologist, 2011, v. 49, n. 1, p. 49
- By:
- Publication type:
- Article
24
Rhetoric and Discourse in Supreme Court Oral Arguments: Sensemaking in Judicial Decisions.
- Published in:
- 2015
- By:
- Publication type:
- Book Review
25
ADVICE FROM THE BENCH (MEMO): CLERK INFLUENCE ON SUPREME COURT ORAL ARGUMENTS.
- Published in:
- Marquette Law Review, 2014, v. 98, n. 1, p. 21
- By:
- Publication type:
- Article
26
U.S. Supreme Court to Hear Oral Arguments in AEP v. Connecticut.
- Published in:
- CoatingsTech, 2011, v. 8, n. 4, p. 14
- Publication type:
- Article
27
Supreme Court Oral Argument Video: A Review of Media Effects Research and Suggestions for Study.
- Published in:
- Brigham Young University Law Review, 2012, v. 2012, n. 6, p. 1719
- By:
- Publication type:
- Article
28
Hyping the Hypothetical: Talk and Temporality in US Supreme Court Oral Arguments.
- Published in:
- Qualitative Sociology, 2024, v. 47, n. 2, p. 249, doi. 10.1007/s11133-024-09563-z
- By:
- Publication type:
- Article
29
Order effects and oral argument at the US Supreme Court.
- Published in:
- Social Science Quarterly (Wiley-Blackwell), 2023, v. 104, n. 6, p. 1222, doi. 10.1111/ssqu.13310
- By:
- Publication type:
- Article
30
You Think; Therefore I Am: Gender Schemas and Context in Oral Arguments at the Supreme Court, 1979–2016.
- Published in:
- Political Research Quarterly, 2023, v. 76, n. 1, p. 143, doi. 10.1177/10659129211069176
- By:
- Publication type:
- Article
31
INTERRUPTIONS IN SEARCH OF A PURPOSE: ORAL ARGUMENT IN THE SUPREME COURT, OCTOBER TERMS 1958-60 AND 2010-12.
- Published in:
- Utah Law Review, 2015, v. 2015, n. 5, p. 1005
- By:
- Publication type:
- Article
32
Televising Supreme Court Oral Argument?
- Published in:
- Law, Culture & the Humanities, 2016, v. 12, n. 2, p. 243, doi. 10.1177/1743872112460740
- By:
- Publication type:
- Article
33
GENDER AND U. S. SUPREME COURT ORAL ARGUMENT ON THE ROBERTS COURT: AN EMPIRICAL EXAMINATION.
- Published in:
- Rutgers Law Journal, 2010, v. 41, n. 3, p. 613
- By:
- Publication type:
- Article
34
Oral argument at the Supreme Court before, during, and after the pandemic.
- Published in:
- Judicature, 2022, v. 106, n. 1, p. 80
- Publication type:
- Article
35
Idaho Supreme Court Oral Arguments for June 2020.
- Published in:
- 2020
- Publication type:
- Calendar
36
Idaho Supreme Court Oral Arguments for May 2020.
- Published in:
- 2020
- Publication type:
- Calendar
37
SUPREME COURT INTERRUPTIONS AND INTERVENTIONS: THE CHANGING ROLE OF THE CHIEF JUSTICE.
- Published in:
- Boston University Law Review, 2023, v. 103, n. 6, p. 1741
- By:
- Publication type:
- Article
38
CONTESTACIÓN AL DISCURSO DE INSTALACIÓN DEL HON. RAFAEL L. MARTÍNEZ TORRES: LA ORALIDAD EN EL TRIBUNAL SUPREMO DE PUERTO RICO.
- Published in:
- Revista de la Academia Puertorriquena de Jurisprudencia y Legislacion, 2024, v. 24, p. 1
- By:
- Publication type:
- Article
39
On the Linguistic Argument for the Adoption of the Library Subject Heading Noncitizen.
- Published in:
- International Journal of Legal Information, 2022, v. 50, n. 1/2, p. 37, doi. 10.1017/jli.2022.17
- By:
- Publication type:
- Article
40
Emotional Arousal Predicts Voting on the U.S. Supreme Court.
- Published in:
- Political Analysis, 2019, v. 27, n. 8, p. 237, doi. 10.1017/pan.2018.47
- By:
- Publication type:
- Article
41
Wayfair, Quill & The Physical Presence Test: Bright-Line Standard Or Diminished Relevance Paradox.
- Published in:
- ABA Tax Times, 2018, v. 37, n. 3, p. 17
- By:
- Publication type:
- Article
42
Verbatim.
- Published in:
- Issues in Law & Medicine, 1997, v. 12, n. 4, p. 393
- Publication type:
- Article
43
Quarterly report of the National Legal Center for the Medically Dependent & Disabled, Inc.
- Published in:
- Issues in Law & Medicine, 1997, v. 12, n. 4, p. V
- Publication type:
- Article
44
In the Supreme Court of the United States.
- Published in:
- Issues in Law & Medicine, 1990, v. 5, n. 4, p. 453
- Publication type:
- Article
45
FISHER V. UNIVERSITY OF TEXAS: WHO PUT THE HOLES IN "HOLISTIC"?
- Published in:
- Duke Journal of Constitutional Law & Public Policy, 2013, v. 9, p. 31
- By:
- Publication type:
- Article
46
ATLANTIC RICHFIELD CO. V. GREGORY A. CHRISTIAN ET AL.: CAN STRICT LIABILITY BE TOO STRICT?
- Published in:
- Environmental Law (Lewis & Clark Law School), 2021, v. 51, n. 1, p. 267
- By:
- Publication type:
- Article
47
Introduction.
- Published in:
- Forum (2194-6183), 2012, v. 10, n. 2, p. -1, doi. 10.1515/1540-8884.1002_int
- By:
- Publication type:
- Article
48
Of Closed Minds and Open Mouths: Indicators of Supreme Court Justice Votes during the 2009 and 2010 Sessions.
- Published in:
- Forum (2194-6183), 2012, v. 10, n. 2, p. -1, doi. 10.1515/1540-8884.1485
- By:
- Publication type:
- Article
49
STATE SHADOW DOCKETS.
- Published in:
- Wisconsin Law Review, 2022, v. 2022, n. 5, p. 1063
- By:
- Publication type:
- Article
50
SCOTUS in the time of COVID: The evolution of justice dynamics during Oral arguments.
- Published in:
- Law & Policy, 2023, v. 45, n. 1, p. 66, doi. 10.1111/lapo.12204
- By:
- Publication type:
- Article