Works matching Odysseus, King of Ithaca (Mythological character)
1
- Journal of Hellenic Studies, 1991, v. 111, p. 16, doi. 10.2307/631885
- Article
3
- Classical Journal, 2015, v. 110, n. 3, p. 279, doi. 10.5184/classicalj.110.3.0279
- Article
4
- Classical Journal, 2015, v. 110, n. 3, p. 257, doi. 10.5184/classicalj.110.3.0257
- Article
8
- Theatre Survey, 2016, v. 57, n. 3, p. 383, doi. 10.1017/S0040557416000338
- Article
10
- Logos: A Journal of Catholic Thought & Culture, 2013, v. 16, n. 2, p. 126, doi. 10.1353/log.2013.0014
- Article
12
- Journal of Hellenic Studies, 2018, v. 138, p. 150, doi. 10.1017/S0075426918000095
- Article
13
- Journal of Hellenic Studies, 1989, v. 109, p. 191, doi. 10.2307/632051
- Article
14
- Journal of Hellenic Studies, 1987, v. 107, p. 180, doi. 10.2307/630082
- Article
15
- Journal of Hellenic Studies, 1986, v. 106, p. 145, doi. 10.2307/629649
- Article
18
- Culture, Medicine & Psychiatry, 2015, v. 39, n. 3, p. 380, doi. 10.1007/s11013-014-9416-5
- Article
19
- Alkemie, 2012, n. 9, p. 159
- Article
20
- Archiv für Papyrusforschung und Verwandte Gebiete, 2011, v. 57, n. 2, p. 297, doi. 10.1515/APF.2011.297
- Article
24
- European Review, 2005, v. 13, n. 1, p. 47, doi. 10.1017/S1062798705000050
- Article
25
- Eras, 2014, v. 15, p. 1
- Article
26
- 2018
- BOTERO CAMACHO, MANUEL;
- RODRÍGUEZ PÉREZ, MIGUEL
- Literary Criticism
27
- Renaissance Quarterly, 2020, v. 73, n. 3, p. 775, doi. 10.1017/rqx.2020.119
- Article
28
- Neohelicon, 2014, v. 41, n. 1, p. 185, doi. 10.1007/s11059-012-0159-4
- Article
29
- Eirene, 2018, v. 54, n. 1/2, p. 11
- Article
31
- International Journal of Humanities Education, 2016, v. 14, n. 3, p. 11, doi. 10.18848/2327-0063/cgp/v14i03/11-20
- Article
32
- Vergilius, 2017, v. 63, p. 3
- Article
33
- Humanities (2076-0787), 2018, v. 7, n. 4, p. 107, doi. 10.3390/h7040107
- Article
35
- Classical Bulletin, 2008, v. 84, n. 2, p. 7
- Article
36
- Classical Bulletin, 2005, v. 81, n. 2, p. 107
- Article
38
- International Journal of Interdisciplinary Social Sciences, 2011, v. 5, n. 9, p. 393, doi. 10.18848/1833-1882/CGP/v05i09/51892
- Article
39
- Trends in Classics, 2014, v. 6, n. 2, p. 399, doi. 10.1515/tc-2014-0020
- Article
40
- Trends in Classics, 2014, v. 6, n. 2, p. 412, doi. 10.1515/tc-2014-0021
- Article
42
- Trends in Classics, 2011, v. 3, n. 2, p. 197, doi. 10.1515/tcs.2011.010
- Article
43
- Trends in Classics, 2011, v. 3, n. 1, p. 38, doi. 10.1515/tcs.2011.003
- Article
44
- Trends in Classics, 2011, v. 3, n. 1, p. 1, doi. 10.1515/tcs.2011.001
- Article
45
- Trends in Classics, 2010, v. 2, n. 2, p. 300, doi. 10.1515/tcs.2010.016
- Article
48
- Aufklärung, 2012, v. 24, p. 385
- Article
49
- Journal of Analytical Psychology, 1986, v. 31, n. 1, p. 63, doi. 10.1111/j.1465-5922.1986.00063.x
- Article
50
- Semiotica, 1997, v. 117, n. 2-4, p. 47, doi. 10.1515/semi.1997.117.2-4.47
- Article