Works matching Natural Resources Defense Council
1
- Harvard Environmental Law Review, 2009, v. 33, n. 2, p. 593
- Article
2
- Tulane Environmental Law Journal, 2009, v. 23, n. 1, p. 187
- Article
3
- UCLA Journal of Environmental Law & Policy, 2014, v. 32, n. 2, p. 329, doi. 10.5070/l5322022594
- Smith, Maxwell C.;
- Kanatas, Catherine E.
- Article
4
- Tulane Environmental Law Journal, 2013, v. 26, n. 2, p. 352
- Article
5
- Journal of Law & Politics, 2017, v. 32, n. 3, p. 293
- Article
6
- Journal of Law & Politics, 2017, v. 32, n. 2, p. 211
- Article
7
- Iowa Law Review, 2008, v. 93, n. 2, p. 665
- Article
8
- Tax Lawyer, 2012, v. 65, n. 3, p. 695
- Article
9
- Administrative Law Review, 2015, v. 67, n. 3, p. 481
- Article
10
- Tulane Environmental Law Journal, 2009, v. 23, n. 1, p. 159
- Article
11
- Tulane Environmental Law Journal, 2008, v. 22, n. 1, p. 171
- Article
12
- Ecology Law Quarterly, 2015, v. 42, n. 2, p. 541
- Article
13
- Ecology Law Quarterly, 2010, v. 37, n. 2, p. 759
- Article
15
- Harvard Environmental Law Review, 2018, v. 42, n. 1, p. 1
- Article
16
- 2016
- Cruden, John C.;
- Oakes, Matthew R.
- Speech
17
- Harvard Environmental Law Review, 2015, v. 39, n. 1, p. 23
- Carlson, Ann E.;
- Herzog, Megan M.
- Article
18
- Harvard Environmental Law Review, 2014, v. 38, n. 2, p. 479
- Article
19
- Harvard Environmental Law Review, 2013, v. 37, n. 2, p. 539
- Article
20
- Harvard Environmental Law Review, 2010, v. 34, n. 1, p. 257
- Article
21
- Tulane Journal of International & Comparative Law, 2015, v. 23, n. 2, p. 383
- Article
22
- SMU Law Review, 2013, v. 66, n. 3, p. 541
- Article
23
- Alabama Law Review, 2019, v. 70, n. 3, p. 733
- Article
24
- Berkeley Technology Law Journal, 2017, v. 32, p. 315, doi. 10.15779/Z38TD9N78M
- Article
25
- Virginia Sports & Entertainment Law Journal, 2011, v. 10, n. 2, p. 323
- Article
26
- Boston College Journal of Law & Social Justice, 2014, v. 34, n. 3, p. 1
- Article
27
- UMKC Law Review, 2019, v. 87, n. 3, p. 549
- Article
28
- Missouri Law Review, 2016, v. 81, n. 4, p. 1075
- Article
29
- Missouri Law Review, 2016, v. 81, n. 4, p. 983
- Article
30
- Missouri Law Review, 2016, v. 81, n. 3, p. 811
- Article
31
- Texas Law Review, 2014, v. 92, n. 4, p. 1027
- Article
32
- Texas Law Review, 1997, v. 75, n. 5, p. 1085
- Article
33
- Virginia Tax Review, 2013, v. 32, n. 4, p. 813
- Article
34
- Wisconsin Law Review, 2024, v. 2024, n. 5, p. 1585, doi. 10.59015/wlr.TMCS5118
- WALKER, CHRISTOPHER J.;
- MENON, NEENA
- Article
35
- CPA Journal, 2012, v. 82, n. 2, p. 46
- Article
36
- Texas Review of Law & Politics, 2016, v. 20, n. 2, p. 391
- Article
37
- Northwestern University Law Review, 2010, v. 104, n. 3, p. 799
- Article
38
- JGIM: Journal of General Internal Medicine, 2025, v. 40, n. 3, p. 674, doi. 10.1007/s11606-024-09099-6
- Bohler, Forrest;
- Brock, Callaham;
- Bohler, Lily
- Article
39
- Seton Hall Law Review, 2017, v. 47, n. 2, p. 653
- Article
40
- Florida Bar Journal, 2025, v. 99, n. 2, p. 18
- Article
41
- Florida Bar Journal, 2017, v. 91, n. 6, p. 43
- Article
42
- Washington Law Review, 2017, v. 92, n. 4, p. 1991
- Article
43
- Creighton Law Review, 2013, v. 46, n. 2, p. 309
- Article
44
- Michigan Law Review, 2000, v. 99, n. 3, p. 532, doi. 10.2307/1290495
- Article
45
- Law & Policy, 2006, v. 28, n. 4, p. 444, doi. 10.1111/j.1467-9930.2006.00234.x
- Richards, Mark J.;
- Smith, Joseph L.;
- Kritzer, Herbert M.
- Article
46
- New York University Journal of Law & Liberty, 2016, v. 10, n. 2, p. 810
- Article
47
- Charleston Law Review, 2013, v. 7, n. 3, p. 411
- Article
48
- California Law Review, 2003, v. 91, n. 5, p. 1375, doi. 10.2307/3481346
- Article
49
- Boston College Environmental Affairs Law Review, 2017, v. 44, p. 41
- Article
50
- Boston College Environmental Affairs Law Review, 2014, v. 41, n. 3, p. 118
- Article