Works matching National Federation of Independent Business v. Sebelius
1
- University of New Hampshire Law Review, 2013, v. 11, n. 2, p. 189
- Article
3
- University of Arkansas at Little Rock Law Review, 2013, v. 35, n. 3, p. 539
- Article
4
- UMKC Law Review, 2012, v. 81, n. 2, p. 313
- Article
5
- Maryland Law Review, 2013, v. 73, n. 1, p. 133
- Article
6
- Maryland Law Review, 2013, v. 72, n. 4, p. 1415
- Article
7
- Boston University Law Review, 2013, v. 93, n. 6, p. 2131
- Article
8
- Creighton Law Review, 2013, v. 46, n. 4, p. 721
- Article
9
- Pace Law Review, 2014, v. 34, n. 3, p. 1320, doi. 10.58948/2331-3528.1873
- Article
10
- Argumentation & Advocacy, 2021, v. 57, n. 2, p. 123, doi. 10.1080/10511431.2021.1897275
- Article
11
- William & Mary Bill of Rights Journal, 2015, v. 24, n. 2, p. 369
- McConville, Celestine Richards
- Article
12
- Journal of Health & Life Sciences Law, 2013, v. 6, n. 2, p. 88
- Cook, Michael H.;
- Evans, Jennifer L.
- Article
13
- Tulane Environmental Law Journal, 2013, v. 26, n. 2, p. 346
- Article
14
- Cumberland Law Review, 2012, v. 43, n. 1, p. 139
- Article
16
- Journal of Health Politics, Policy & Law, 2013, v. 38, n. 2, p. 255, doi. 10.1215/03616878-1966243
- Article
17
- Notre Dame Journal of Law, Ethics & Public Policy, 2013, v. 27, n. 2, p. 481
- PARENTO, EMILY WHELAN;
- GOSTIN, LAWRENCE O.
- Article
18
- Boston University Law Review, 2013, v. 93, n. 1, p. 1
- HUBERFELD, NICOLE;
- LEONARD, ELIZABETH WEEKS;
- OUTTERSON, KEVIN
- Article
19
- Charleston Law Review, 2012, v. 7, n. 2, p. 317
- Schaffzin, Katharine Traylor
- Article
20
- e-Journal of Science & Technology, 2013, v. 8, n. 5, p. 19
- Article
21
- Connecticut Law Review, 2013, v. 45, n. 5, p. 19
- Article
22
- Cleveland State Law Review, 2013, v. 61, n. 4, p. 1051
- Article
23
- Journal of Health Care Law & Policy, 2014, v. 17, n. 2, p. 219
- GONZALES, ALBERTO R.;
- STUART, DONALD B.
- Article
24
- Journal of Health Care Law & Policy, 2014, v. 17, n. 1, p. 3
- Article
25
- George Washington Law Review, 2016, v. 84, n. 2, p. 511
- Article
26
- George Washington Law Review, 2014, v. 82, n. 4, p. 1052
- Article
27
- University of New Hampshire Law Review, 2013, v. 11, n. 1, p. 1
- Article
28
- Developments in Mental Health Law, 2012, v. 31, n. 5, p. 1
- Article
29
- SMU Law Review, 2015, v. 68, n. 2, p. 385
- Article
30
- SMU Law Review, 2014, v. 67, n. 1, p. 3
- Crayton, Kareem;
- Smith, Terry
- Article
31
- American University Journal of Gender, Social Policy & the Law, 2014, v. 22, n. 2, p. 387
- Article
32
- Journal of Law, Medicine & Ethics, 2016, v. 44, n. 4, p. 576, doi. 10.1177/1073110516684789
- Article
33
- Journal of Law, Medicine & Ethics, 2013, v. 41, p. 77, doi. 10.1111/jlme.12045
- Article
34
- University of Arkansas at Little Rock Law Review, 2013, v. 35, n. 3, p. 609
- Article
35
- University of Arkansas at Little Rock Law Review, 2013, v. 35, n. 3, p. 591
- Article
36
- University of Arkansas at Little Rock Law Review, 2013, v. 35, n. 3, p. 559
- Article
37
- Michigan State Law Review, 2013, v. 2013, n. 3, p. 853
- Article
38
- Texas Law Review, 2014, v. 92, n. 6, p. 1617
- Article
41
- 2013
- Ching, Kenneth K.;
- Lewis, C. S.
- Case Study
42
- Chicago-Kent Law Review, 2014, v. 89, n. 1, p. 503
- Article
43
- 2013
- Golberstein, Ezra;
- Busch, Susan H.
- Opinion
44
- Texas Review of Law & Politics, 2013, v. 17, n. 2, p. 204
- Article
45
- American Journal of Criminal Law, 2014, v. 41, n. 3, p. 263
- Article
46
- Northwestern University Law Review, 2014, v. 108, n. 3, p. 799
- Article
47
- University of Toledo Law Review, 2016, v. 47, n. 3, p. 821
- Article
48
- Yale Law & Policy Review, 2016, v. 35, n. 1, p. 87
- Article
49
- Yale Law & Policy Review, 2012, v. 30, n. 2, p. 461
- Article
50
- Creighton Law Review, 2013, v. 46, n. 2, p. 207
- Article