Juvenile Justice's Second Chance: Untangling the Retroactive Application of Miller v . Alabama Under the Teague Doctrine.
- Published in:
- American Journal of Criminal Law, 2014, v. 42, n. 1, p. 1
- By:
- Publication type:
- Article
Works matching Miller v. Alabama
Results: 153
1
2
CRIMINAL LAW--SENTENCING JUVENILES-- WHERE DO WE GO FROM HERE? MANDATORY SENTENCING AND RETROACTIVE A PPLICATION POST-MILLER. MILLER V. ALABAMA, 132 S. CT. 2455 (2012).
- Published in:
- University of Arkansas at Little Rock Law Review, 2015, v. 37, n. 2, p. 311
- By:
- Publication type:
- Article
3
Precedent as a Policy Map: What Miller v. Alabama Tells Us About Emerging Adults and the Direction of Contemporary Youth Services.
- Published in:
- Missouri Law Review, 2013, v. 78, n. 4, p. 1183
- By:
- Publication type:
- Article
4
Miller v. Alabama: What It Is, What It May Be, and What It Is Not.
- Published in:
- Missouri Law Review, 2013, v. 78, n. 4, p. 1041
- By:
- Publication type:
- Article
5
Juvenile Lifers and Judicial Overreach: A Curmudgeonly Meditation on Miller v. Alabama.
- Published in:
- Missouri Law Review, 2013, v. 78, n. 4, p. 1015
- By:
- Publication type:
- Article
6
Symposium: Bombshell or Babystep? The Ramifications of Miller v. Alabama for Sentencing Law and Juvenile Crime Policy.
- Published in:
- Missouri Law Review, 2013, v. 78, n. 4, p. 1003
- By:
- Publication type:
- Article
7
Precedent as a Policy Map: What Miller v. Alabama Tells Us About Emerging Adults and the Direction of Contemporary Youth Services.
- Published in:
- Missouri Law Review, 2013, v. 78, n. 3, p. 1183
- By:
- Publication type:
- Article
8
Miller v. Alabama: What It Is, What It May Be, and What It Is Not.
- Published in:
- Missouri Law Review, 2013, v. 78, n. 3, p. 1041
- By:
- Publication type:
- Article
9
Juvenile Lifers and Judicial Overreach: A Curmudgeonly Meditation on Miller v. Alabama.
- Published in:
- Missouri Law Review, 2013, v. 78, n. 3, p. 1015
- By:
- Publication type:
- Article
10
Symposium: Bombshell or Babystep? The Ramifications of Miller v. Alabama for Sentencing Law and Juvenile Crime Policy.
- Published in:
- Missouri Law Review, 2013, v. 78, n. 3, p. 1003
- By:
- Publication type:
- Article
11
CRUEL AND UNUSUAL BEFORE AND AFTER 2012: MILLER V. ALABAMA MUST APPLY RETROACTIVELY.
- Published in:
- Maryland Law Review, 2015, v. 74, n. 4, p. 1001
- By:
- Publication type:
- Article
12
A Suggested Minor Refinement of Miller v. Alabama.
- Published in:
- McGeorge Law Review, 2014, v. 46, n. 4, p. 907
- By:
- Publication type:
- Article
13
GETTING JUVENILE LIFE WITHOUT PAROLE "RIGHT" AFTER MILLER V. ALABAMA.
- Published in:
- 2012
- By:
- Publication type:
- Essay
14
Juveniles Make Bad Decisions, But Are Not Adults & Law Continues to Account For This Difference: The Supreme Court's Decision to Apply Miller v. Alabama Retroactively Will Have a Significant Impact on Many Decades of Reform and Current Debate Around Juvenile Sentencing
- Published in:
- Pace Law Review, 2017, v. 37, n. 2, p. 765, doi. 10.58948/2331-3528.1951
- By:
- Publication type:
- Article
15
MILLER V. ALABAMA: THE SUPREME COURT'S LENIENT APPROACH TO OUR NATION'S JUVENILE MURDERERS.
- Published in:
- Loyola Law Review, 2012, v. 58, n. 4, p. 1073
- By:
- Publication type:
- Article
16
DEVELOPMENTAL DETOUR: HOW THE MINIMALISM OF MILLER V. ALABAMA LED THE COURT'S "KIDS ARE DIFFERENT" EIGHTH AMENDMENT JURISPRUDENCE DOWN A BLIND ALLEY.
- Published in:
- Akron Law Review, 2013, v. 46, n. 2, p. 489
- By:
- Publication type:
- Article
17
THE CASE OF THE MISSING ARGUMENT: THE MYSTERIOUS DISAPPEARANCE OF INTERNATIONAL LAW FROM JUVENILE SENTENCING IN MILLER V. ALABAMA, 132 S. CT. 2455 (2012).
- Published in:
- Harvard Journal of Law & Public Policy, 2013, v. 36, n. 1, p. 355
- By:
- Publication type:
- Article
18
Departing from Teague: Miller v. Alabama's Invitation to the States to Experiment with New Retroactivity Standards.
- Published in:
- Ohio State Journal of Criminal Law, 2014, v. 12, n. 1, p. 213
- By:
- Publication type:
- Article
19
Cruel and Unusual: The Effect of Miller v. Alabama on the Indefinite Civil Confinement of Juvenile Sex Offenders.
- Published in:
- New England Journal on Criminal & Civil Confinement, 2015, v. 41, n. 1, p. 225
- By:
- Publication type:
- Article
20
The Place of Families in Juvenile Defense Work After Miller v. Alabama.
- Published in:
- New England Journal on Criminal & Civil Confinement, 2013, v. 39, n. 2, p. 293
- By:
- Publication type:
- Article
21
Miller v. Alabama: Implications for Forensic Mental Health Assessment at the Intersection of Social Science and the Law.
- Published in:
- New England Journal on Criminal & Civil Confinement, 2013, v. 39, n. 2, p. 319
- By:
- Publication type:
- Article
22
THE RETROACTIVITY OF SUBSTANTIVE RULES TO CASES ON COLLATERAL REVIEW AND THE AEDPA, WITH A SPECIAL FOCUS ON MILLER V. ALABAMA.
- Published in:
- Indiana Law Review, 2015, v. 48, n. 3, p. 931, doi. 10.18060/4806.0015
- By:
- Publication type:
- Article
23
JUST GROW UP ALREADY: THE DIMINISHED CULPABILITY OF JUVENILE GANG MEMBERS AFTER MILLER v. ALABAMA.
- Published in:
- Boston College Law Review, 2014, v. 55, n. 1, p. 265
- By:
- Publication type:
- Article
24
MILLER V. ALABAMA AND THE RETROACTIVITY OF PROPORTIONALITY RULES.
- Published in:
- University of Pennsylvania Journal of Constitutional Law, 2015, v. 17, n. 4, p. 929
- By:
- Publication type:
- Article
25
SENTENCED TO CONFUSION: MILLER V. ALABAMA AND THE COMING WAVE OF EIGHTH AMENDMENT CASES.
- Published in:
- 2012
- By:
- Publication type:
- Essay
26
Treating Adults Like Children: Re-Sentencing Adult Juvenile Lifers After Miller v. Alabama.
- Published in:
- Minnesota Law Review, 2015, v. 99, n. 3, p. 1159
- By:
- Publication type:
- Article
27
SENTENCING AND PUNISHMENT: THE MISSED OPPORTUNITY FOR A CATEGORICAL RULE AGAINST LIFE WITHOUT THE POSSIBILITY OF PAROLE FOR JUVENILES MILLER v. ALABAMA, 132 S. CT. 2455 (2012).
- Published in:
- University of Florida Journal of Law & Public Policy, 2013, v. 24, n. 2, p. 313
- By:
- Publication type:
- Article
28
AS THOUGH THEY ARE CHILDREN: REPLACING MANDATORY MINIMUMS WITH INDIVIDUALIZED SENTENCING DETERMINATIONS FOR JUVENILES IN PENNSYLVANIA CRIMINAL COURT AFTER MILLER V. ALABAMA.
- Published in:
- Temple Law Review, 2013, v. 86, n. 1, p. 215
- By:
- Publication type:
- Article
29
Developmental Neurobiology and Miller v. Alabama: to What Extent Do Juvenile Brains Change?
- Published in:
- Cleveland State Law Review, 2025, v. 73, n. 2, p. 404
- By:
- Publication type:
- Article
30
FREEDOM'S ROAD: YOUTH, PAROLE, AND THE PROMISE OF MILLER V. ALABAMA AND GRAHAM V. FLORIDA.
- Published in:
- Cardozo Law Review, 2014, v. 35, n. 3, p. 1031
- By:
- Publication type:
- Article
31
MILLER V. ALABAMA AND THE PROBLEM OF PREDICTION.
- Published in:
- Columbia Law Review, 2019, v. 119, n. 6, p. 1633
- By:
- Publication type:
- Article
32
Changing Juvenile Justice Policy in Response to the US Supreme Court: Implementing Miller v. Alabama.
- Published in:
- Youth Justice, 2015, v. 15, n. 1, p. 76, doi. 10.1177/1473225414529201
- By:
- Publication type:
- Article
33
THE IMPORTANCE OF AN EXPANSIVE DEFERENCE TO MILLER V. ALABAMA.
- Published in:
- American University Journal of Gender, Social Policy & the Law, 2013, v. 22, n. 1, p. 167
- By:
- Publication type:
- Article
34
Mill(er)ing Mandatory Minimums: What Federal Lawmakers Should Take from Miller v. Alabama.
- Published in:
- Missouri Law Review, 2013, v. 78, n. 4, p. 1147
- By:
- Publication type:
- Article
35
Categorically Redeeming Graham v Florida and Miller v Alabama: Why the Eighth Amendment Guarantees All Juvenile Defendants a Constitutional Right to a Parole Hearing.
- Published in:
- University of Chicago Law Review, 2019, v. 86, n. 5, p. 1439
- By:
- Publication type:
- Article
36
Miller v. Alabama: Is Death (Still) Different?
- Published in:
- 2013
- By:
- Publication type:
- Essay
37
Youth Matters: Miller v. Alabama and the Future of Juvenile Sentencing.
- Published in:
- 2013
- By:
- Publication type:
- Essay
38
Victims and the Supreme Court's Eighth Amendment Jurisprudence in Miller v. Alabama: A Tale of a Constitutive Paradox for Victims.
- Published in:
- New England Journal on Criminal & Civil Confinement, 2013, v. 39, n. 2, p. 303
- By:
- Publication type:
- Article
39
RETURN TO REHABILITATION: ILLINOIS' EVOLVING JUVENILE SENTENCING PRACTICES IN LIGHT OF MILLER V. ALABAMA.
- Published in:
- Southern Illinois University Law Journal, 2019, v. 43, n. 2, p. 403
- By:
- Publication type:
- Article
40
Sentencing Children Who Kill: One Giant Leap for the US Supreme Court, One Small Step for International Human Rights Law.
- Published in:
- Human Rights Law Review, 2012, v. 12, n. 4, p. 801, doi. 10.1093/hrlr/ngs032
- By:
- Publication type:
- Article
41
The End of Mandatory Juvenile Life Without Parole.
- Published in:
- Criminal Justice Policy Review, 2014, v. 25, n. 5, p. 553, doi. 10.1177/0887403413478159
- By:
- Publication type:
- Article
42
Risk assessment and juvenile resentencing: A critical analysis.
- Published in:
- 2018
- By:
- Publication type:
- journal article
43
Life-sentenced juveniles: Public perceptions of risk and need for incarceration.
- Published in:
- 2018
- By:
- Publication type:
- journal article
44
FALCON V. STATE: SHOULD THE FLORIDA SUPREME COURT HAVE OPENED THE DOOR FOR SENTENCING REVIEW OF JUVENILES SENTENCED TO LIFE IN PRISON FOR MURDER?
- Published in:
- St. Thomas Law Review, 2018, v. 30, n. 2, p. 267
- By:
- Publication type:
- Article
45
THE GROWING PAINS OF GRAHAM V. FLORIDA'. DECIPHERING WHETHER LENGTHY TERM-OF-YEARS SENTENCES FOR JUVENILE DEFENDANTS CAN EQUATE TO THE UNCONSTITUTIONAL SENTENCE OF LIFE WITHOUT THE POSSIBILITY OF PAROLE.
- Published in:
- St. Thomas Law Review, 2013, v. 25, n. 2, p. 182
- By:
- Publication type:
- Article
46
THE TRILOGY AND BEYOND.
- Published in:
- South Dakota Law Review, 2017, v. 62, n. 3, p. 539
- By:
- Publication type:
- Article
47
KIDS CAN CHANGE: REFORMING SOUTH DAKOTA'S JUVENILE TRANSFER LAW TO REHABILITATE CHILDREN AND PROTECT PUBLIC SAFETY.
- Published in:
- South Dakota Law Review, 2014, v. 59, n. 2, p. 312
- By:
- Publication type:
- Article
48
Implementing Proportionality.
- Published in:
- U.C. Davis Law Review, 2017, v. 50, n. 3, p. 961
- By:
- Publication type:
- Article
49
Instilling Hope: Suggested Legislative Reform for Missouri Regarding Juvenile Sentencing Pursuant to Supreme Court Decisions in Miller and Montgomery.
- Published in:
- Missouri Law Review, 2017, v. 82, n. 1, p. 267
- By:
- Publication type:
- Article
50
Not Just Kid Stuff? Extending Graham and Miller to Adults.
- Published in:
- Missouri Law Review, 2013, v. 78, n. 4, p. 1087
- By:
- Publication type:
- Article