LIABLE FOR LIBEL?-THE TEXAS SUPREME COURT'S OPINION ON OPINIONS AND IMPLICATIONS.
- Published in:
- SMU Law Review, 2019, v. 72, n. 2, p. 335
- By:
- Publication type:
- Article
Works matching Libel and the Supreme Court
Results: 53
1
2
The Supreme Court and Libel (Book).
- Published in:
- 1981
- By:
- Publication type:
- Book Review
3
THE UNITED STATES SUPREME COURT LIBEL.
- Published in:
- Quarterly Journal of Speech, 1982, v. 68, n. 4, p. 384, doi. 10.1080/00335638209383622
- By:
- Publication type:
- Article
4
CROOKES V. NEWTON: THE SUPREME COURT OF CANADA BRINGS LIBEL LAW INTO THE INTERNET AGE.
- Published in:
- Alberta Law Review, 2012, v. 50, n. 1, p. 205, doi. 10.29173/alr276
- By:
- Publication type:
- Article
5
FIFTY YEARS AFTER NEW YORK TIMES CO. V. SULLIVAN AND FORTY YEARS AFTER GERTZ V. WELCH: HOW THESE TWENTIETH CENTURY SUPREME COURT RULINGS IMPACT TWENTY-FIRST CENTURY ONLINE SOCIAL MEDIA LIBEL CLAIMS.
- Published in:
- Journal of Science & Technology Law, 2014, v. 20, n. 2, p. 191
- By:
- Publication type:
- Article
6
Fumbled Call: The Bear Bryant–Wally Butts Football Scandal That Split the Supreme Court and Changed American Libel Law.
- Published in:
- 2019
- By:
- Publication type:
- Book Review
7
Fumbled Call: The Bear Bryant-Wally Butts Football Scandal That Split the Supreme Court and Changed American Libel Law.
- Published in:
- 2019
- By:
- Publication type:
- Book Review
8
Historic Times v. Sullivan and Gertz v. Welch Supreme Court Decisions and Online Social Media Libel Law.
- Published in:
- International Journal of Interactive Communication Systems & Technologies, 2013, v. 3, n. 2, p. 48, doi. 10.4018/ijicst.2013070104
- By:
- Publication type:
- Article
9
Fumbled Call: The Bear Bryant-Wally Butts Football Scandal That Split the Supreme Court and Changed American Libel Law.
- Published in:
- Journal of Sport History, 2019, v. 46, n. 1, p. 133, doi. 10.5406/jsporthistory.46.1.0133
- By:
- Publication type:
- Article
10
Defamation.. public figure.
- Published in:
- American Bar Association Journal, 1979, v. 65, n. 10, p. 1545
- By:
- Publication type:
- Article
11
THE ACTUAL MALICE RULE: WHY CANADA REJECTED THE AMERICAN APPROACH TO LIBEL.
- Published in:
- Communication Law & Policy, 1998, v. 3, n. 1, p. 55, doi. 10.1080/10811689809368641
- By:
- Publication type:
- Article
12
COMMENT: GROUP LIBEL.
- Published in:
- California Law Review, 1953, v. 41, n. 2, p. 290, doi. 10.2307/3478081
- By:
- Publication type:
- Article
13
Internet Famous: Are Online Influencers and Micro-Celebrities Public Figures Under Defamation Law?
- Published in:
- Missouri Law Review, 2023, v. 88, n. 3, p. 715
- By:
- Publication type:
- Article
14
Picking Fights in Missouri: Baldwin's Non-Rule Embraces the Minority Approach to Internet Libel Jurisdiction.
- Published in:
- Missouri Law Review, 2011, v. 76, n. 4, p. 1265
- By:
- Publication type:
- Article
15
Constitutional Decline.
- Published in:
- New Political Science (Duke University Press), 2024, v. 46, n. 3, p. 317, doi. 10.1080/07393148.2024.2386761
- By:
- Publication type:
- Article
16
PERVASIVE PUBLIC FIGURE STATUS AND LOCAL OR TOPICAL FAME IN LIGHT OF EVOLVING MEDIA AUDIENCES.
- Published in:
- Journalism & Mass Communication Quarterly, 1998, v. 75, n. 1, p. 112, doi. 10.1177/107769909807500112
- By:
- Publication type:
- Article
17
Unrelated Scandal, Unprotected Defamation: Why Courts Should Reject a Problematic Framing of the Germaneness-Scope Rule Which Prioritizes Potential Impact on Public Opinion.
- Published in:
- Seton Hall Law Review, 2023, v. 53, n. 4, p. 1273
- By:
- Publication type:
- Article
18
WHAT THEY SAID.
- Published in:
- American Bar Association Journal, 1980, v. 66, n. 2, p. 140
- Publication type:
- Article
19
The End of Libel in Labor Cases?
- Published in:
- American Bar Association Journal, 1976, v. 62, n. 6, p. 456
- By:
- Publication type:
- Article
20
UNDERSTANDING THE FIRST AMENDMENT.
- Published in:
- Washington Law Review, 2012, v. 87, n. 2, p. 549
- By:
- Publication type:
- Article
21
"Pure Caucasian Blood": Libel by Racial Misidentification in American Newspapers (1900–1957).
- Published in:
- American Journalism, 2021, v. 38, n. 1, p. 54, doi. 10.1080/08821127.2021.1866935
- By:
- Publication type:
- Article
22
Significant Decisions in Labor Cases.
- Published in:
- Monthly Labor Review, 1974, v. 97, n. 9, p. 57
- Publication type:
- Article
23
Significant Decisions in Labor Cases.
- Published in:
- Monthly Labor Review, 1966, v. 89, n. 5, p. 532
- Publication type:
- Article
24
Move to Clear and Convincing Proof As Libel Standard Gain for Media.
- Published in:
- Journalism Quarterly, 1989, v. 66, n. 3, p. 640, doi. 10.1177/107769908906600316
- By:
- Publication type:
- Article
25
Origins of the Actual Malice Test.
- Published in:
- Journalism Quarterly, 1985, v. 62, n. 4, p. 750, doi. 10.1177/107769908506200406
- By:
- Publication type:
- Article
26
Rationalizing Libel Law in Wake Of Gertz: The Problem and a Proposal.
- Published in:
- Journalism Quarterly, 1985, v. 62, n. 3, p. 540, doi. 10.1177/107769908506200312
- By:
- Publication type:
- Article
27
Judging Public Interest in Libel: The Gertz Decision's Contribution.
- Published in:
- Journalism Quarterly, 1984, v. 61, n. 1, p. 117, doi. 10.1177/107769908406100116
- By:
- Publication type:
- Article
28
Effects of Herbert V Lando On the News Process.
- Published in:
- Journalism Quarterly, 1983, v. 60, n. 1, p. 115, doi. 10.1177/107769908306000119
- By:
- Publication type:
- Article
29
How State Courts Have Responded to Gertz in Setting Standards of Fault.
- Published in:
- Journalism Quarterly, 1979, v. 56, n. 3, p. 531, doi. 10.1177/107769907905600310
- By:
- Publication type:
- Article
30
Exploitation of American Indian Symbols: A First Amendment Analysis.
- Published in:
- American Indian Quarterly, 2008, v. 32, n. 2, p. 121, doi. 10.1353/aiq.2008.0017
- By:
- Publication type:
- Article
31
THE STRONG MEDICINE OF OVERBREADTH AS APPLIED TO CRIMINAL LIBEL.
- Published in:
- Case Western Reserve Law Review, 2009, v. 59, n. 2, p. 553
- By:
- Publication type:
- Article
32
Evidence? We don't need no evidence! Proof of negligence in private plantiff defamation suits.
- Published in:
- Communications & the Law, 1997, v. 19, n. 2, p. 9
- By:
- Publication type:
- Article
33
The Maoriland Worker and Blasphemy in New Zealand.
- Published in:
- Labour History, 2006, n. 91, p. 113, doi. 10.2307/27516155
- Publication type:
- Article
34
THE 'MAORILAND WORKER' BLASPHEMY IN NEW ZEALAND.
- Published in:
- Labour History, 2006, n. 91, p. 113, doi. 10.2307/27516155
- By:
- Publication type:
- Article
35
The Press and Libel Before New York Times v. Sullivan.
- Published in:
- Columbia Journal of Law & the Arts, 2021, v. 44, n. 4, p. 511, doi. 10.52214/jla.v44i4.8195
- By:
- Publication type:
- Article
36
AIDS researcher loses libel fight against French newspaper.
- Published in:
- Nature, 1996, v. 384, n. 6604, p. 10
- Publication type:
- Article
37
FREE SPEECH, FAIRNESS, AND FIDUCIARY DUTY IN BROADCASTING.
- Published in:
- Law & Contemporary Problems, 1969, v. 34, n. 2, p. 278, doi. 10.2307/1191091
- By:
- Publication type:
- Article
38
THE CONSTITUTION AND INTERNATIONAL AGREEMENTS OR UNILATERAL ACTION CURBING "PEACE-IMPERILING" PROPAGANDA.
- Published in:
- Law & Contemporary Problems, 1966, v. 31, n. 3, p. 506, doi. 10.2307/1190737
- By:
- Publication type:
- Article
39
DECIPHERING Dun & Bradstreet: DOES THE FIRST AMENDMENT MATTER IN PRIVATE FIGURE-PRIVATE CONCERN DEFAMATION CASES?
- Published in:
- Communication Law & Policy, 2009, v. 14, n. 1, p. 1, doi. 10.1080/10811680802577632
- By:
- Publication type:
- Article
40
JUSTICE BRENNAN, JUSTICE HARLAN AND NEW YORK TIMES CO. V. SULLIVAN: A CASE STUDY IN SUPREME COURT DECISION.
- Published in:
- Communication Law & Policy, 1996, v. 1, n. 4, p. 469, doi. 10.1080/10811689609368613
- By:
- Publication type:
- Article
41
ROOM FOR ERROR ONLINE: REVISING GEORGIA'S RETRACTION STATUTE TO ACCOMMODATE THE RISE OF INTERNET MEDIA.
- Published in:
- Georgia State University Law Review, 2012, v. 28, n. 3, p. 923
- By:
- Publication type:
- Article
42
WHERE INTELLECTUAL PROPERTY AND FREE SPEECH COLLIDE.
- Published in:
- Boston College Law Review, 2010, v. 51, n. 1, p. 1307
- By:
- Publication type:
- Article
43
Gilles vs Pugh and the lost letter.
- Published in:
- 2009
- By:
- Publication type:
- journal article
44
Libel Proof Plaintiff Defense Wins Some, Loses Some.
- Published in:
- Newspaper Research Journal, 2002, v. 23, n. 2/3, p. 79, doi. 10.1177/073953290202300207
- By:
- Publication type:
- Article
45
Libel and statements of opinion before and after Milkovich.
- Published in:
- Newspaper Research Journal, 1994, v. 15, n. 3, p. 105, doi. 10.1177/073953299401500309
- By:
- Publication type:
- Article
46
Good news or bad for the press?
- Published in:
- Newspaper Research Journal, 1993, v. 14, n. 3/4, p. 99, doi. 10.1177/073953299301400311
- By:
- Publication type:
- Article
47
Chilling the Messenger: Impact of Libel on Community Newspapers.
- Published in:
- Newspaper Research Journal, 1990, v. 11, n. 2, p. 86, doi. 10.1177/073953299001100208
- By:
- Publication type:
- Article
48
RETHINKING JUDICIAL SUPREMACY.
- Published in:
- Constitutional Commentary, 2016, v. 31, n. 3, p. 381
- By:
- Publication type:
- Article
49
CORPORATE LIBEL PLAINTIFFS AND THE NEWS MEDIA: AN ANALYSIS OF THE PUBLIC-PRIVATE FIGURE DISTINCTION AFTER GERTZ.
- Published in:
- American Business Law Journal, 1983, v. 21, n. 2, p. 127, doi. 10.1111/j.1744-1714.1983.tb00075.x
- By:
- Publication type:
- Article
50
CREDITOR'S RIGHT TO COMMUNICATE WITH DEBTOR'S EMPLOYER IN PURSUING COLLECTION.
- Published in:
- American Business Law Journal, 1974, v. 12, n. 2, p. 197, doi. 10.1111/j.1744-1714.1974.tb00336.x
- By:
- Publication type:
- Article