Works matching Legal status of voters
1
- George Washington Law Review, 2013, v. 81, n. 1, p. 292
- Article
2
- Africa Research Bulletin: Political, Social & Cultural Series, 2014, v. 51, n. 6, p. 20165A, doi. 10.1111/j.1467-825X.2014.05736.x
- Article
3
- Ethical Theory & Moral Practice, 2017, v. 20, n. 4, p. 885, doi. 10.1007/s10677-017-9824-z
- Article
4
- Studies in Political Economy: A Socialist Review, 2015, v. 96, p. 69, doi. 10.1080/19187033.2015.11674938
- Article
6
- Canadian Political Science Review, 2014, v. 8, n. 1, p. 126, doi. 10.24124/c677/2014497
- Kiss, Simon J.;
- Perrella, Andrea M. L.;
- Kay, Barry J.
- Article
7
- Canadian Political Science Review, 2014, v. 8, n. 1, p. 85, doi. 10.24124/c677/2014470
- Pal, Michael;
- Choudhry, Sujit
- Article
8
- UMKC Law Review, 2014, v. 83, n. 2, p. 427
- Article
9
- Missouri Law Review, 2019, v. 84, n. 4, p. 935
- Cain, Bruce E.;
- Parker, Brett
- Article
10
- Social Science Quarterly (Wiley-Blackwell), 2014, v. 95, n. 5, p. 1381, doi. 10.1111/ssqu.12110
- Atkeson, Lonna Rae;
- Alvarez, R. Michael;
- Hall, Thad E.;
- Sinclair, J. Andrew
- Article
12
- Urban Lawyer, 2015, v. 47, n. 3, p. 545
- Article
13
- Notre Dame Journal of Law, Ethics & Public Policy, 2020, v. 34, n. 1, p. 395
- Article
14
- Review of Law & Social Change, 2015, v. 39, n. 2, p. 173
- Article
16
- University of San Francisco Law Review, 2017, v. 51, n. 3, p. 591
- Article
17
- Arkansas Law Review (1968-present), 2014, v. 67, n. 3, p. 817
- Article
18
- Arizona State Law Journal, 2012, v. 44, n. 3, p. 1237
- Article
19
- Washington Law Review, 2014, v. 89, n. 1, p. 175
- Article
20
- Social Policy, 2020, v. 50, n. 4, p. 24
- Article
21
- Arizona Law Review, 2014, v. 56, n. 4, p. 1243
- Pont, Ryan;
- Pollock, Bradley R.
- Article
22
- California Law Review, 2021, v. 109, n. 5, p. 1773, doi. 10.15779/Z38Q52FD6Q
- Pildes, Richard H.;
- Parsons, G. Michael
- Article
23
- Oxford University Commonwealth Law Journal, 2013, v. 13, n. 2, p. 283, doi. 10.5235/14729342.13.2.283
- Article
24
- Rutgers Law Journal, 2014, v. 44, n. 4, p. 745
- Article
25
- Tennessee Law Review, 2014, v. 81, n. 4, p. 929
- Article
26
- Columbia Human Rights Law Review, 2014, v. 45, n. 2, p. 362
- Article
27
- Quinnipiac Law Review, 2014, v. 33, n. 1, p. 33
- Article
28
- Elder Law Journal, 2015, v. 23, n. 1, p. 227
- Article
29
- Willamette Law Review, 2013, v. 49, n. 4, p. 637
- Article
30
- Idaho Law Review, 2020, v. 56, n. 2, p. 155
- Article
31
- Idaho Law Review, 2020, v. 56, n. 2, p. 135
- Article
32
- UCLA Law Review, 2015, v. 62, n. 4, p. 1056
- Article
33
- UCLA Law Review, 2015, v. 62, n. 1, p. 236
- Article
34
- Ohio State Law Journal, 2022, v. 83, n. 3, p. 601
- Article
35
- Ohio State Law Journal, 2016, v. 77, n. 4, p. 689
- PERSILY, NATHANIEL;
- BYKER, SAMUEL;
- EVANS, WILLIAM;
- SACHAR, ALON
- Article
36
- Ohio State Law Journal, 2016, v. 77, n. 4, p. 689
- PERSILY, NATHANIEL;
- BYKER, SAMUEL;
- EVANS, WILLIAM;
- SACHAR, ALON
- Article
37
- Clinical Law Review, 2015, v. 21, n. 2, p. 323
- Article
38
- Stanford Law Review, 2017, v. 69, n. 2, p. 435
- Article
39
- New York University Law Review, 2014, v. 89, n. 2, p. 582
- Article
42
- Historia, 2014, v. 59, n. 1, p. 1
- Article
43
- University of Chicago Legal Forum, 2015, p. 633
- Article
44
- University of Chicago Legal Forum, 2015, p. 585
- Article
45
- University of Chicago Legal Forum, 2015, p. 669
- Article
46
- Georgia Law Review, 2016, v. 51, n. 1, p. 235
- Article
47
- American University Law Review, 2020, v. 69, n. 5, p. 1395
- Article
48
- Wake Forest Law Review, 2013, v. 48, n. 2, p. 515
- Article
49
- Yale Law Journal, 2012, v. 121, n. 7, p. 2013
- Article