Works matching Legal status of criminal defendants
1
- California Law Review, 2021, v. 109, n. 3, p. 1231, doi. 10.15779/Z38VH5CJ86
- Article
2
- California Law Review, 2018, v. 106, n. 4, p. 1379, doi. 10.15779/Z38N58CM0D
- Article
3
- California Law Review, 2017, v. 105, n. 1, p. 179, doi. 10.15779/Z38S27M
- Article
4
- 2017
- Mikolajewski, Amy J.;
- Manguno‐Mire, Gina M.;
- Coffman, Kelly L.;
- Deland, Sarah M.;
- Thompson, John W.;
- Manguno-Mire, Gina M;
- Thompson, John W Jr
- journal article
5
- UMKC Law Review, 2015, v. 84, n. 2, p. 411
- Wood, Stacey;
- Agharkar, Bhushan S.
- Article
6
- Touro Law Review, 2017, v. 33, n. 2, p. 489
- Article
7
- St. John's Law Review, 2014, v. 88, n. 2, p. 495
- Article
8
- San Diego Law Review, 2013, v. 50, n. 2, p. 469
- Article
9
- Denver Law Review, 2019, v. 96, n. 3, p. 733
- Article
10
- Denver Law Review, 2016, v. 93, n. 3, p. 595
- NELSON, KRISTEN;
- BRADY, TAMARA;
- KING, DANIEL
- Article
11
- Journal of Criminal Law & Criminology, 2017, v. 107, n. 4, p. 733
- PIERCE, GLENN L.;
- RADELET, MICHAEL L.;
- SHARP, SUSAN
- Article
12
- Journal of Criminal Law & Criminology, 2017, v. 107, n. 4, p. 561
- GARRETT, BRANDON L.;
- JAKUBOW, ALEXANDER;
- DESAI, ANKUR
- Article
13
- Journal of Criminal Law & Criminology, 2014, v. 104, n. 2, p. 431
- Article
14
- George Mason University Civil Rights Law Journal, 2013, v. 24, n. 1, p. 1
- Article
15
- Alberta Law Review, 2014, v. 52, n. 1, p. 167, doi. 10.29173/alr18
- Article
16
- Southern California Law Review, 2017, v. 90, n. 6, p. 1299
- Article
17
- Southern California Law Review, 2016, v. 89, n. 5, p. 1243
- Article
18
- Southern Illinois University Law Journal, 2020, v. 44, n. 4, p. 627
- Article
19
- William & Mary Law Review, 2018, v. 59, n. 6, p. 2575
- Article
20
- New York University Law Review, 2013, v. 88, n. 6, p. 2319
- Article
21
- New York University Law Review, 2014, v. 89, n. 5, p. 1836
- Article
22
- Notre Dame Journal of Law, Ethics & Public Policy, 2014, v. 28, n. 2, p. 525
- GALLO, JOHN N.;
- GREENFIELD, DANIEL M.
- Article
23
- Mercer Law Review, 2014, v. 65, n. 4, p. 891
- Article
24
- Alabama Law Review, 2015, v. 66, n. 3, p. 423
- Article
25
- Akron Law Review, 2017, v. 50, n. 2, p. 269
- Article
26
- Akron Law Review, 2017, v. 50, n. 2, p. 175
- Article
27
- Jurimetrics: The Journal of Law, Science & Technology, 2019, v. 59, n. 4, p. 439
- Finkelstein, Michael O.;
- Levin, Bruce
- Article
28
- Iowa Law Review, 2017, v. 102, n. 5, p. 2325
- Article
29
- Iowa Law Review, 2016, v. 101, n. 5, p. 1719
- Article
30
- Cornell Law Review, 2017, v. 102, n. 2, p. 413
- Smith, Robert J.;
- Robinson, Zoë
- Article
31
- 2014
- Blume, John H.;
- Helm, Rebecca K.
- Essay
32
- Cornell Law Review, 2014, v. 99, n. 5, p. 981
- Fairfield, Joshua A. T.;
- Luna, Erik
- Article
33
- Minnesota Law Review, 2018, v. 103, n. 2, p. 521
- Article
34
- Minnesota Law Review, 2015, v. 99, n. 5, p. 1935
- Article
35
- Yale Law Journal, 2014, v. 123, n. 4, p. 1014
- Article
36
- Indiana Law Review, 2013, v. 46, n. 4, p. 1289
- Article
37
- Judicature, 2014, v. 97, n. 5, p. 235
- Article
38
- Journal of Supreme Court History, 2015, v. 40, n. 2, p. 203, doi. 10.1353/sch.2015.0017
- Article
39
- Loyola of Los Angeles Law Review, 2015, v. 48, n. 4, p. 1209
- Article
40
- Brooklyn Law Review, 2014, v. 79, n. 4, p. 1771
- Article
41
- Brooklyn Law Review, 2014, v. 79, n. 3, p. 1091
- Article
42
- New England Law Review, 2015, v. 49, n. 2, p. 167
- Article
43
- Boston University Law Review, 2021, v. 101, n. 5, p. 1667
- BAMBAUER, JANE;
- ROTH, ANDREA
- Article
44
- Touro Law Review, 2013, v. 29, n. 3, p. 839
- Article
45
- Temple Law Review, 2013, v. 86, n. 1, p. 149
- Article
46
- Syracuse Law Review, 2014, v. 65, n. 1, p. 191
- Article
47
- New Mexico Law Review, 2019, v. 49, n. 2, p. 354
- Article
48
- New Mexico Law Review, 2019, v. 49, n. 2, p. 193
- Article
49
- Victoria University of Wellington Law Review, 2014, v. 45, n. 1, p. 109
- Article
50
- Duke Law & Technology Review, 2015, v. 14, n. 1, p. 219
- Article