The Procedural Queer: Substantive Due Process, Lawrence v. Texas , and Queer Rhetorical Futures.
- Published in:
- 2012
- By:
- Publication type:
- Essay
Works matching Lawrence v. Texas
Results: 209
1
2
Falling through the Cracks: Queer Theory, Same-Sex Marriage, Lawrence v Texas, and Liminal Bodies.
- Published in:
- disClosure, 2011, v. 20, p. 24
- By:
- Publication type:
- Article
3
Lawrence v. Texas and the Limits of the Criminal Law.
- Published in:
- Harvard Civil Rights-Civil Liberties Law Review, 2007, v. 42, n. 1, p. 1
- By:
- Publication type:
- Article
4
Before Lawrence v. Texas: The Making of a Queer Social Movement by Wesley G. Phelps (review).
- Published in:
- Southwestern Historical Quarterly, 2024, v. 127, n. 3, p. 365, doi. 10.1353/swh.2024.a918126
- By:
- Publication type:
- Article
5
QUEER EYE FOR THE MILITARY GUY: WILL "DON'T ASK, DON'T TELL" SURVIVE IN THE WAKE OF LAWRENCE V. TEXAS?
- Published in:
- St. John's Law Review, 2004, v. 78, n. 3, p. 897
- By:
- Publication type:
- Article
6
Defining One's Own Concept of Existence and the Meaning of the Universe: The Presumption of Liberty in Lawrence v. Texas.
- Published in:
- Brigham Young University Law Review, 2006, v. 2006, n. 3, p. 837
- By:
- Publication type:
- Article
7
The Walking Dead: How the Criminal Regulation of Sodomy Survived Lawrence v. Texas.
- Published in:
- Missouri Law Review, 2021, v. 86, n. 3, p. 1
- By:
- Publication type:
- Article
8
United States: Lawrence v. Texas and the imperative of comparative constitutionalism.
- Published in:
- International Journal of Constitutional Law, 2004, v. 2, n. 3, p. 555, doi. 10.1093/icon/2.3.555
- By:
- Publication type:
- Article
9
SOUTH CAROLINA'S SEXUAL CONDUCT LAWS AFTER LAWRENCE V. TEXAS.
- Published in:
- South Carolina Law Review, 2010, v. 61, n. 4, p. 799
- By:
- Publication type:
- Article
10
TYRONE GARNER'S LAWRENCE v. TEXAS.
- Published in:
- 2013
- By:
- Publication type:
- Book Review
11
THE GLUCKSBERG RENAISSANCE: SUBSTANTIVE DUE PROCESS SINCE LAWRENCE V. TEXAS.
- Published in:
- Michigan Law Review, 2006, v. 105, n. 2, p. 409
- By:
- Publication type:
- Article
12
SURVIVING LAWRENCE v. TEXAS.
- Published in:
- Michigan Law Review, 2004, v. 102, n. 7, p. 1615, doi. 10.2307/4141915
- By:
- Publication type:
- Article
13
Queer (Theory) Eye for the Straight (Legal) Guy: Lawrence v. Texas' Makeover of Bowers v. Hardwick.
- Published in:
- Political Research Quarterly, 2006, v. 59, n. 3, p. 401, doi. 10.1177/106591290605900307
- By:
- Publication type:
- Article
14
DUE PROCESS DISESTABLISHMENT: WHY LAWRENCE V. TEXAS IS A FIRST AMENDMENT CASE.
- Published in:
- New York University Law Review, 2016, v. 91, n. 6, p. 1794
- By:
- Publication type:
- Article
15
THE DOMESTICATED LIBERTY OF LAWRENCE V. TEXAS.
- Published in:
- Columbia Law Review, 2004, v. 104, n. 5, p. 1399, doi. 10.2307/4099390
- By:
- Publication type:
- Article
16
FULFILLING THE FULL PROMISE OF LIBERTY MADE IN LAWRENCE V. TEXAS: USING THE FUNDAMENTAL RIGHT TO SEXUAL INTIMACY TO CHALLENGE THE FDA'S POLICY AGAINST BLOOD DONATIONS FROM MEN WHO HAVE SEX WITH MEN.
- Published in:
- New York University Journal of Legislation & Public Policy, 2017, v. 20, n. 3, p. 827
- By:
- Publication type:
- Article
17
RAINING ON THE PARADE OF HORRIBLES: OF SLIPPERY SLOPES, FAUX SLOPES, AND JUSTICE SCALIA'S DISSENT IN LAWRENCE V. TEXAS.
- Published in:
- University of Pennsylvania Law Review, 2005, v. 153, n. 3, p. 1097, doi. 10.2307/4150646
- By:
- Publication type:
- Article
18
Flagrant Conduct: The Story of Lawrence v. Texas: How a Bedroom Arrest Decriminalized Gay Americans.
- Published in:
- 2013
- By:
- Publication type:
- Book Review
19
Hints, not Holdings: Use of Precedent in Lawrence v. Texas.
- Published in:
- BYU Journal of Public Law, 2004, v. 18, n. 2, p. 681
- By:
- Publication type:
- Article
20
GOING TO THE CHAPEL AND WE'RE GOING TO GET MARRIED; BUT WILL THE STATE RECOGNIZE THE MARRIAGE? THE CONSTITUTIONALITY OF STATE MARRIAGE LAWS AFTER LAWRENCE V. TEXAS.
- Published in:
- Texas Journal on Civil Liberties & Civil Rights, 2005, v. 10, n. 2, p. 189
- By:
- Publication type:
- Article
21
THE INCEST HORRIBLE: DELIMITING THE LAWRENCE V. TEXAS RIGHT TO SEXUAL AUTONOMY.
- Published in:
- Michigan Journal of Gender & Law, 2016, v. 23, n. 1, p. 187, doi. 10.36641/mjgl.23.1.incest
- By:
- Publication type:
- Article
22
The Pursuit of Happiness (and Sexual Freedom): Lawrence v. Texas, Morality Legislation & the Sandy Springs Obscenity Statute.
- Published in:
- 2015
- By:
- Publication type:
- Opinion
23
THE RIGHT DECISION FOR THE WRONG REASON: THE SUPREME COURT CORRECTLY INVALIDATES THE TEXAS HOMOSEXUAL SODOMY STATUTE, BUT RATHER THAN FINDING AN EQUAL PROTECTION VIOLATION IN <em>LAWRENCE V. TEXAS</em>, THE COURT INCORRECTLY AND UNNECESSARILY OVERRULES <em>BOWERS V. HARDWICK</em>
- Published in:
- Creighton Law Review, 2004, v. 37, n. 3, p. 653
- By:
- Publication type:
- Article
24
How State Courts Apply Lawrence v. Texas in Civil Contexts: A Mixed-Methods Content Analysis of Two Decades of Cases.
- Published in:
- Law & Sexuality: A Review of Lesbian, Gay, Bisexual & Transgender Legal Issues, 2023, v. 32, p. 1
- By:
- Publication type:
- Article
25
A PENUMBRA OVERLOOKED: THE FREE EXERCISE CLAUSE AND LAWRENCE V. TEXAS.
- Published in:
- Harvard Journal of Law & Gender, 2007, v. 30, n. 1, p. 203
- By:
- Publication type:
- Article
26
LAWRENCE V TEXAS: IMPLICATIONS FOR PUBLIC HEALTH POLICY AND PRACTICE.
- Published in:
- Public Health Reports, 2003, v. 118, n. 6, p. 559, doi. 10.1093/phr/118.6.559
- By:
- Publication type:
- Article
27
LAWRENCE V. TEXAS AND JUDICIAL HUBRIS.
- Published in:
- Michigan Law Review, 2004, v. 102, n. 7, p. 1555, doi. 10.2307/4141914
- By:
- Publication type:
- Article
28
THE UNKNOWN PAST OF LAWRENCE V. TEXAS.
- Published in:
- Michigan Law Review, 2004, v. 102, n. 7, p. 1464, doi. 10.2307/4141912
- By:
- Publication type:
- Article
29
A GENERAL SOVEREIGN/PUBLIC EMPLOYER DISTINCTION: SHOULD GARCETTI V. CEBALLOS GOVERN PUBLIC EMPLOYMENT CASES CONCERNING OFF-DUTY SEXUAL CONDUCT INSTEAD OF LAWRENCE V. TEXAS?
- Published in:
- Quinnipiac Law Review, 2020, v. 38, n. 2, p. 325
- By:
- Publication type:
- Article
30
Does lawrence v. Texas Provide Constitutional Support For Same-Sex Marriage?
- Published in:
- Law Review: Judicial Doctrine & Case-Law, 2020, v. 10, n. 2, p. 77
- By:
- Publication type:
- Article
31
Using Judicial Motives to Persuade Judges: A Dramatistic Analysis of the Petitioners’ Brief in Lawrence v. Texas.
- Published in:
- Legal Communication & Rhetoric: JALWD, 2020, v. 17, p. 103
- By:
- Publication type:
- Article
32
RECONCILING LAWRENCE V. TEXAS WITH "DON'T ASK, DON'T TELL": THE VALUE OF THE Cook V. GATES INIERMEDIATE-DEFERENTIAL APPROACH.
- Published in:
- George Mason University Civil Rights Law Journal, 2010, v. 20, n. 2, p. 237
- By:
- Publication type:
- Article
33
AND THEN THERE WERE NONE: THE REPEAL OF SODOMY LAWS AFTER LAWRENCE V. TEXAS AND ITS EFFECT ON THE CUSTODY AND VISITATION RIGHTS OF GAY AND LESBIAN PARENTS.
- Published in:
- St. John's Law Review, 2004, v. 78, n. 2, p. 397
- By:
- Publication type:
- Article
34
Disorderly Conduct: an Interrogation of Residual Sodomy Laws Five Years after Lawrence v. Texas.
- Published in:
- Nebula, 2009, v. 6, n. 2, p. 22
- By:
- Publication type:
- Article
35
Lawrence v. Texas: A Victory for Liberty.
- Published in:
- 2003
- By:
- Publication type:
- Essay
36
WRITING ON, AROUND, AND THROUGH LAWRENCE V. TEXAS.
- Published in:
- Creighton Law Review, 2005, v. 38, n. 2, p. 493
- By:
- Publication type:
- Article
37
North Carolina Courts: Legislating Compulsory Heterosexuality by Creating New Crimes Under the Crime Against Nature Statute Post-Lawrence v. Texas.
- Published in:
- Law & Sexuality: A Review of Lesbian, Gay, Bisexual & Transgender Legal Issues, 2011, v. 20, p. 1
- By:
- Publication type:
- Article
38
УТИЦАЈ СУДСКЕ ПРАКСЕ НА ЗАКОНСКУ РЕГУЛАТИВУ У ОБЛАСТИ ПРАВА ЛГБТ ЗАЈЕДНИЦЕ
- Published in:
- Socioloski Pregled, 2021, v. 55, n. 3, p. 690, doi. 10.5937/socpreg55-32553
- By:
- Publication type:
- Article
39
Unraveling Lawrence's Concerns About Legislated Morality: The Constitutionality of Laws Criminalizing the Sale of Obscene Devices.
- Published in:
- Brigham Young University Law Review, 2010, v. 2010, n. 4, p. 1369
- By:
- Publication type:
- Article
40
Sexual Privacy in the Internet Age: How Substantive Due Process Protects Online Obscenity.
- Published in:
- Vanderbilt Journal of Entertainment & Technology Law, 2013, v. 16, n. 1, p. 103
- By:
- Publication type:
- Article
41
Deadly Desires: The Juridical Birth of Queer Humanism Amidst Slavery's Afterlife.
- Published in:
- UCLA Law Review, 2022, v. 69, n. 3, p. 878
- By:
- Publication type:
- Article
42
EQUAL DIGNITY, COLORBLINDNESS, AND THE FUTURE OF AFFIRMATIVE ACTION BEYOND GRUTTER V. BOLLINGER.
- Published in:
- William & Mary Law Review, 2022, v. 64, n. 1, p. 1
- By:
- Publication type:
- Article
43
TOYS ARE US: SEX TOYS, SUBSTANTIVE DUE PROCESS, AND THE AMERICAN WAY.
- Published in:
- Columbia Journal of Gender & Law, 2009, v. 18, n. 3, p. 807
- By:
- Publication type:
- Article
44
Dignitary Harms and Abortion Law.
- Published in:
- American Journal of Bioethics, 2022, v. 22, n. 8, p. 85, doi. 10.1080/15265161.2022.2089273
- By:
- Publication type:
- Article
45
MY BODY IS MY TEMPLE: UTILIZING THE CONCEPT OF DIGNITY IN SUPREME COURT JURISPRUDENCE TO FIGHT SEX REASSIGNMENT SURGERY REQUIREMENTS FOR RECOGNITION OF LEGAL SEX.
- Published in:
- 2016
- By:
- Publication type:
- Opinion
46
The Sodomy Cases: Bowers v. Hardwick and Lawrence v. Texas.
- Published in:
- 2010
- By:
- Publication type:
- Book Review
47
Perspectives on Sexual Orientation and Gender Identity in Family Law.
- Published in:
- Family Court Review, 2018, v. 56, n. 3, p. 361, doi. 10.1111/fcre.12352
- By:
- Publication type:
- Article
48
PULLING AN OLD DUSTY WEAPON OUT OF THE DRAWER: THE RETURN OF MORALITY POLICE POWERS TO REGULATE UNWANTED HOME-BASED BUSINESSES.
- Published in:
- UMKC Law Review, 2012, v. 81, n. 1, p. 231
- By:
- Publication type:
- Article
49
Law Review Symposium 2014 -- Keynote by Erwin Chemerinsky.
- Published in:
- U.C. Davis Law Review, 2014, v. 48, n. 2, p. 447
- By:
- Publication type:
- Article
50
OBSERVATIONS ON MACDONALD V. MOOSE.
- Published in:
- South Carolina Law Review, 2014, v. 65, n. 4, p. 951
- By:
- Publication type:
- Article