Works matching Lanham Act
1
- Creighton Law Review, 2018, v. 52, n. 1, p. 71
- Article
2
- Columbia Law Review, 2015, v. 115, n. 4, p. 983
- Article
3
- Journal of Contemporary Legal Issues, 2010, v. 19, n. 1, p. 70
- Article
4
- Law & Contemporary Problems, 1996, v. 59, n. 2, p. 93, doi. 10.2307/1192072
- Alexander, Miles J.;
- Heilbronner, Michael K.
- Article
5
- Law & Contemporary Problems, 1996, v. 59, n. 2, p. 45, doi. 10.2307/1192070
- Article
7
- University of Louisville Law Review, 2011, v. 49, n. 4, p. 465
- Carp, Megan M.;
- Murphy, Kathryn T.
- Article
8
- IDEA: The Intellectual Property Law Review, 2019, v. 59, n. 2, p. 333
- Article
9
- Marquette Sports Law Review, 2015, v. 26, n. 1, p. 160
- Article
10
- Iowa Law Review, 2013, v. 98, n. 2, p. 809
- Article
11
- Stanford Law Review, 2019, v. 71, n. 4, p. 1023
- Article
12
- Journal of Marketing, 1949, v. 13, n. 4, p. 498, doi. 10.2307/1247789
- Article
13
- Journal of Science & Technology Law, 2018, v. 24, n. 1, p. 135
- Article
14
- Texas Intellectual Property Law Journal, 2023, v. 31, n. 2, p. 211
- Article
15
- Texas Intellectual Property Law Journal, 2008, v. 16, n. 2, p. 257
- Article
16
- Boston College Law Review, 2020, v. 61, n. 1, p. 253
- Article
17
- Journal of Intellectual Property & Entertainment Law, 2015, v. 4, n. 2, p. 226
- Article
18
- American University Business Law Review, 2024, v. 14, n. 1, p. 381
- Article
19
- Vanderbilt Journal of Entertainment & Technology Law, 2019, v. 21, n. 3, p. 823
- Gracey, James Christopher
- Article
20
- Vanderbilt Journal of Entertainment & Technology Law, 2013, v. 16, n. 1, p. 11
- Article
21
- Cardozo Arts & Entertainment Law Journal, 2021, v. 39, n. 3, p. 987
- MCKENNA, MARK P.;
- RUEDEN, BRITTANY VON
- Article
22
- St. John's Law Review, 2010, v. 84, n. 4, p. 1347
- Article
23
- William & Mary Business Law Review, 2018, v. 9, n. 2, p. 521
- Article
24
- Journal of the Academy of Marketing Science, 2004, v. 32, n. 4, p. 469
- Keaty, Anne;
- Srivastava, Rajesh;
- Viguerie, Robert
- Article
25
- Columbia Journal of Law & Social Problems, 2022, v. 55, n. 2, p. 1
- Article
26
- Columbia Journal of Law & Social Problems, 2021, v. 55, n. 1, p. 1
- Article
27
- Bench & Bar of Minnesota, 2020, v. 77, n. 11, p. 10
- Article
28
- Creighton Law Review, 2008, v. 41, n. 3, p. 515
- Article
30
- California Law Review, 2000, v. 88, n. 1, p. 127, doi. 10.2307/3481277
- Article
31
- Arbitration Journal, 1973, v. 28, n. 4, p. 272
- Article
32
- Missouri Law Review, 2023, v. 88, n. 3, p. 831
- Article
33
- Missouri Law Review, 2017, v. 82, n. 1, p. 191
- Article
34
- Missouri Law Review, 2012, v. 77, n. 1, p. 267
- Article
35
- Capital University Law Review, 2017, v. 45, n. 1, p. 161
- Article
36
- Journal of Contemporary Legal Issues, 2010, v. 19, n. 1, p. 95
- Article
37
- Journal of Contemporary Legal Issues, 2010, v. 19, n. 1, p. 333
- Ubarieke, Paterson;
- Flaherty, Sean
- Article
38
- Journal of Contemporary Legal Issues, 2010, v. 19, n. 1, p. 22
- Article
39
- Journal of Contemporary Legal Issues, 2010, v. 19, n. 1, p. 513
- Article
41
- Journal of Contemporary Legal Issues, 2010, v. 19, n. 1, p. 81
- Article
42
- Southern California Law Review, 2025, v. 98, n. 1, p. 165
- Article
43
- Southern California Law Review, 2013, v. 86, n. 4, p. 921
- Article
44
- Law & Contemporary Problems, 1994, v. 57, n. 4, p. 243, doi. 10.2307/1192064
- Article
45
- Law & Contemporary Problems, 1949, v. 14, n. 2, p. 269, doi. 10.2307/1189836
- Article
46
- Law & Contemporary Problems, 1949, v. 14, n. 2, p. 173, doi. 10.2307/1189830
- Article
47
- Journal of Intellectual Property Law, 2015, v. 23, n. 1, p. 211
- Article
48
- Marquette Sports Law Review, 2018, v. 28, n. 2, p. 463
- Article
49
- Northwestern University Law Review, 2005, v. 99, n. 4, p. 1817
- Zimdahl, Stephanie Dotson
- Article
50
- Journal of Intellectual Property Law & Practice, 2016, v. 11, n. 1, p. 7, doi. 10.1093/jiplp/jpv199
- Goldberg, David P.;
- Rothstein, Chester P.;
- Macedo, Charles R.
- Article