Works matching Kennedy, Anthony M., 1936-
1
- Columbia Journal of Gender & Law, 2015, v. 29, n. 1, p. 85
- Article
2
- Hypatia, 2024, v. 39, n. 1, p. 159, doi. 10.1017/hyp.2023.100
- Article
3
- University of Queensland Law Journal, 2012, v. 31, n. 2, p. 203
- Article
4
- Elon Law Review, 2014, v. 6, n. 2, p. 323
- Article
5
- Elon Law Review, 2014, v. 6, n. 2, p. 303
- Article
6
- Alabama Law Review, 2019, v. 70, n. 3, p. 757
- Article
7
- Berkeley Technology Law Journal, 2007, v. 22, n. 1, p. 67
- Article
8
- UMKC Law Review, 2013, v. 82, n. 1, p. 79
- Article
9
- U.C. Davis Law Review, 2014, v. 48, n. 2, p. 675
- Article
10
- Michigan State Law Review, 2019, v. 2019, n. 1, p. 23
- Article
11
- South Carolina Law Review, 2012, v. 63, n. 3, p. 729
- Article
12
- South Carolina Law Review, 2008, v. 59, n. 4, p. 735
- Article
13
- South Carolina Law Review, 2008, v. 59, n. 4, p. 673
- Article
14
- Journal of State Taxation, 2015, v. 33, n. 4, p. 41
- Article
15
- Stanford Law Review, 2006, v. 58, n. 6, p. 1673
- Article
16
- Social Research, 2013, v. 80, n. 4, p. 1033
- Article
17
- Review of Law & Social Change, 2013, v. 37, n. 1, p. 229
- Article
18
- Boston University Law Review, 2016, v. 96, n. 5, p. 1789
- Article
19
- Boston University Law Review, 2015, v. 95, n. 2, p. 641
- Article
20
- Boston University Law Review, 2015, v. 95, n. 2, p. 587
- Article
22
- Boston University Law Review, 2011, v. 91, n. 5, p. 1783
- Article
24
- Seton Hall Law Review, 2021, v. 51, n. 4, p. 983
- Article
25
- Houston Law Review, 2023, v. 60, n. 3, p. 519
- Article
27
- Publius: The Journal of Federalism, 2019, v. 49, n. 3, p. 490, doi. 10.1093/publius/pjz012
- Article
28
- Harvard Civil Rights-Civil Liberties Law Review, 2007, v. 42, n. 1, p. 1
- Article
29
- Harvard Civil Rights-Civil Liberties Law Review, 2008, v. 43, n. 2, p. 491
- Fischbach, Jonathan;
- Rhee, Will;
- Cacaee, Robert
- Article
30
- Charleston Law Review, 2018, v. 13, n. 1, p. 97
- Article
31
- Dissent (0012-3846), 2016, v. 63, n. 1, p. 25, doi. 10.1353/dss.2016.0014
- Article
32
- California Law Review, 2014, v. 102, n. 4, p. 971
- Article
33
- Harvard Kennedy School Review, 2019, v. 19, p. 158
- Article
34
- McGeorge Law Review, 2013, v. 44, n. 1, p. 247
- Article
35
- McGeorge Law Review, 2013, v. 44, n. 1, p. 61
- Article
36
- McGeorge Law Review, 2013, v. 44, n. 1, p. 229
- Article
37
- McGeorge Law Review, 2013, v. 44, n. 1, p. 201
- Article
38
- McGeorge Law Review, 2013, v. 44, n. 1, p. 167
- Bhagwat, Ashutosh;
- Struhar, Matthew
- Article
39
- McGeorge Law Review, 2013, v. 44, n. 1, p. 103
- Article
40
- McGeorge Law Review, 2013, v. 44, n. 1, p. 77
- Article
41
- McGeorge Law Review, 2013, v. 44, n. 1, p. 211
- Article
42
- McGeorge Law Review, 2013, v. 44, n. 1, p. 31
- Article
43
- McGeorge Law Review, 2013, v. 44, n. 1, p. 1
- Article
44
- McGeorge Law Review, 2013, v. 44, n. 1, p. 3
- Parker, Elizabeth Rindskopf
- Article
45
- McGeorge Law Review, 2013, v. 44, n. 1, p. 1
- Article
46
- Journal of Transportation Law, Logistics & Policy, 2007, v. 74, n. 3, p. 312
- Article
47
- Roger Williams University Law Review, 2015, v. 20, n. 1, p. 24
- Article
48
- San Diego Law Review, 2012, v. 49, n. 3, p. 693
- KELSO, CHARLES D.;
- KELSO, R. RANDALL
- Article
49
- Iowa Law Review, 2011, v. 96, n. 2, p. 649
- Article
50
- American Journal of Criminal Justice, 2015, v. 40, n. 2, p. 416, doi. 10.1007/s12103-014-9271-5
- Smith, Christopher;
- McCall, Madhavi;
- McCall, Michael
- Article