Works matching Kelo v. City of New London
1
- Journal of Private Enterprise, 2016, v. 31, n. 2, p. 87
- Article
2
- Journal of Legal Studies Education, 2008, v. 25, n. 2, p. 343, doi. 10.1111/j.1744-1722.2008.00056.x
- Odom, Lamar;
- González, Analco
- Article
3
- Indiana Law Review, 2011, v. 45, n. 1, p. 21
- Article
4
- Urban Lawyer, 2012, v. 44, n. 4, p. 865
- Article
5
- Sport Marketing Quarterly, 2007, v. 16, n. 3, p. 171
- Nagel, Mark S.;
- Southall, Richard M.
- Article
6
- Harvard Journal of Law & Public Policy, 2006, v. 29, n. 2, p. 759
- Article
7
- Harvard Journal of Law & Public Policy, 2006, v. 29, n. 2, p. 491
- Article
8
- George Mason Law Review, 2016, v. 23, n. 2, p. 253
- Article
9
- BYU Journal of Public Law, 2005, v. 20, n. 1, p. 139
- Article
10
- Hamline Journal of Public Law & Policy, 2005, v. 27, n. 1, p. 115
- Article
11
- Ecology Law Quarterly, 2006, v. 33, n. 3, p. 545
- Article
12
- Marketing Management Journal, 2008, v. 18, n. 2, p. 179
- STEWART, GEOFFREY T.;
- BOWIE-HILL, JERILYN;
- KEATY, ANNE K.;
- SRIVASTAVA, RAJESH
- Article
13
- Harvard Environmental Law Review, 2006, v. 30, n. 1, p. 261
- Article
18
- Urban Geography, 2013, v. 34, n. 8, p. 1047, doi. 10.1080/02723638.2013.819683
- Article
19
- Alabama Law Review, 2012, v. 63, n. 5, p. 941
- Article
20
- Journal of Legal Studies Education, 2014, v. 31, n. 1, p. 55, doi. 10.1111/jlse.12009
- Article
21
- Missouri Law Review, 2014, v. 79, n. 3, p. 715
- Article
22
- Texas Law Review, 2013, v. 91, n. 7, p. 2015
- Article
24
- Urban Lawyer, 2015, v. 47, n. 3, p. 501
- Article
26
- Urban Lawyer, 2012, v. 44, n. 3, p. 719
- Article
27
- Urban Lawyer, 2012, v. 44, n. 3, p. 705
- Article
28
- Urban Lawyer, 2011, v. 43, n. 3, p. 889
- Article
29
- Urban Lawyer, 2010, v. 42, n. 3, p. 693
- Article
30
- Urban Lawyer, 2009, v. 41, n. 3, p. 563
- Article
31
- Urban Lawyer, 2009, v. 41, n. 1, p. 183
- Article
32
- Urban Lawyer, 2006, v. 38, n. 3, p. 685
- Article
33
- Columbia Journal of Law & Social Problems, 2011, v. 45, n. 5, p. 45
- Article
34
- Fordham Urban Law Journal, 2020, v. 48, n. 1, p. 143
- Article
35
- Boston College Environmental Affairs Law Review, 2012, v. 39, n. 2, p. 243
- Article
36
- Regent University Law Review, 2015, v. 28, n. 2, p. 319
- Article
37
- Regulation & Governance, 2023, v. 17, n. 2, p. 449, doi. 10.1111/rego.12464
- Article
38
- Journal of Empirical Legal Studies, 2008, v. 5, n. 4, p. 713, doi. 10.1111/j.1740-1461.2008.00139.x
- Nadler, Janice;
- Diamond, Shari Seidman
- Article
39
- Journal of Land Use & Environmental Law, 2010, v. 25, n. 2, p. 191
- Gieseler, Nicholas M.;
- Gieseler, Steven Geoffrey
- Article
40
- William Mitchell Law Review, 2015, v. 41, n. 1, p. 299
- Article
41
- Idaho Law Review, 2014, v. 50, n. 2, p. 85
- Article
42
- Ohio State Law Journal, 2011, v. 72, n. 4, p. 777
- Article
43
- North Dakota Law Review, 2010, v. 86, n. 4, p. 845
- Article
44
- Connecticut Law Review, 2010, v. 42, n. 3, p. 925
- Article
45
- Brooklyn Law Review, 2019, v. 84, n. 2, p. 421
- Article
46
- Brooklyn Law Review, 2012, v. 77, n. 3, p. 1217
- Article
47
- Albany Government Law Review, 2011, v. 4, n. 2, p. 302
- Article
48
- Albany Government Law Review, 2011, v. 4, n. 2, p. 186
- Article
49
- Albany Government Law Review, 2011, v. 4, n. 2, p. 38
- Article
50
- Albany Government Law Review, 2011, v. 4, n. 2, p. 1
- Article