Works matching Katz v. United States
1
- St. Thomas Law Review, 2012, v. 24, n. 2, p. 101
- Emmas, Kevin;
- Pallas, Tamara
- Article
2
- North Carolina Law Review, 2012, v. 91, n. 1, p. 1
- Article
3
- Case Western Reserve Law Review, 1991, v. 41, n. 2, p. 581
- Article
4
- St. Mary's Law Journal, 2016, v. 48, n. 1, p. 115
- Article
5
- American University Journal of Gender, Social Policy & the Law, 2011, v. 19, n. 4, p. 1327
- Article
7
- Berkeley Technology Law Journal, 2011, v. 26, n. 2, p. 979
- Determann, Lothar;
- Sprague, Robert
- Article
8
- Defense Counsel Journal, 2017, v. 84, n. 4, p. 1
- Fischer, Amy Sherry;
- Cartmell, Jordyn Eckert;
- Frank, Liam
- Article
9
- UMKC Law Review, 2016, v. 85, n. 1, p. 255
- Article
10
- Missouri Law Review, 2017, v. 82, n. 2, p. 483
- Article
11
- Missouri Law Review, 2014, v. 79, n. 3, p. 755
- Article
12
- Texas Law Review, 2004, v. 82, n. 6, p. 1349
- Article
13
- South Carolina Law Review, 2014, v. 65, n. 4, p. 709
- Article
14
- Notre Dame Journal of Law, Ethics & Public Policy, 2020, v. 34, n. 1, p. 421
- Article
15
- Business Lawyer, 2016, v. 72, n. 1, p. 265
- Article
16
- Boston University Law Review, 2017, v. 97, n. 3, p. 685
- CASSELL, PAUL G.;
- FOWLES, RICHARD
- Article
17
- American Journal of Criminal Law, 2017, v. 44, n. 2, p. 253
- Article
18
- American Journal of Criminal Law, 2011, v. 38, n. 3, p. 289
- Fradella, Henry F.;
- Morrow, Weston J.;
- Fischer, Ryan G.;
- Ireland, Connie
- Article
19
- New York Law School Law Review, 2020, v. 65, n. 2, p. 259
- Article
20
- Hamline Law Review, 2015, v. 38, n. 3, p. 467
- Article
21
- Fordham Urban Law Journal, 2017, v. 44, n. 3, p. 767
- Article
22
- Cardozo Arts & Entertainment Law Journal, 2022, v. 40, n. 1, p. 175
- Article
23
- St. Louis University Law Journal, 2017, v. 61, n. 2, p. 351
- Article
24
- St. Louis University Law Journal, 2016, v. 60, n. 3, p. 391
- Article
25
- Harvard Journal of Law & Technology, 2016, v. 30, n. 1, p. 1
- Bellovin, Steven M.;
- Blaze, Matt;
- Landau, Susan;
- Pell, Stephanie K.
- Article
26
- Tennessee Law Review, 2015, v. 82, n. 4, p. 937
- Article
27
- Law & Psychology Review, 2018, v. 42, p. 103
- Article
28
- Case Western Reserve Law Review, 2014, v. 65, n. 2, p. 413
- Article
29
- Journal of the Missouri Bar, 2013, v. 69, n. 6, p. 336
- Article
30
- Pace Law Review, 2013, v. 33, n. 2, p. 683, doi. 10.58948/2331-3528.1832
- Article
31
- Loyola of Los Angeles Law Review, 2022, v. 55, n. 4, p. 1053
- Article
32
- Loyola of Los Angeles Law Review, 2014, v. 47, n. 2, p. 451
- Article
33
- Harvard Journal of Law & Public Policy, 2020, v. 43, n. 2, p. 425
- Article
34
- Journal of the American Academy of Matrimonial Lawyers, 2015, v. 27, n. 2, p. 263
- Article
35
- Emory Law Journal, 2017, v. 66, n. 3, p. 527
- Article
36
- Widener Law Review, 2020, v. 26, n. 2, p. 241
- Article
37
- North Carolina Law Review, 2018, v. 96, n. 2, p. 546
- Article
38
- Rutgers Computer & Technology Law Journal, 2021, v. 47, n. 1, p. 103
- Article
39
- 2014
- Lamparello, Adam;
- MacLean, Charles
- Essay
40
- University of Chicago Law Review, 2017, v. 84, n. 4, p. 1747
- Kugler, Matthew B.;
- Strahilevitz, Lior Jacob
- Article
42
- Brooklyn Law Review, 2017, v. 82, n. 3, p. 1377
- Article
43
- Vanderbilt Law Review, 2013, v. 66, n. 3, p. 933
- Article
44
- Georgia State University Law Review, 2017, v. 33, n. 2, p. 485
- Article
45
- Georgia Law Review, 2017, v. 51, n. 2, p. 557
- Article
46
- George Mason Law Review, 2020, v. 28, n. 1, p. 1
- Article
47
- Southern Illinois University Law Journal, 2012, v. 36, n. 3, p. 475
- Article
48
- California Western Law Review, 2014, v. 51, n. 1, p. 7
- Article
49
- William & Mary Law Review, 2012, v. 53, n. 5, p. 1797
- Article
50
- Indiana Law Journal, 2015, v. 90, n. 1, p. 1
- Article